Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS Wiki Contribution
On 03/27/2011 01:58 PM, Alex/AT wrote: Manuel Wolfshantwo...@nobugconsulting.ro писал(а) в своём письме Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:57:27 +0400: I modified it a bit. However, I fail to understand why is all this complicate procedure needed, given that starting the installer with linux ext4 (linux ext4dev for the centos releases prior to 5.5, if I am not mistaken) achieves the same goal without any need for workarounds ? The ext4 type of filesystem will be present in the disk druid interface and can be used exactly as any other one. Oops. Did not know that. If that is the case, the the article is really not needed. I've changed the http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallOnExt4 page to reflect the recommended option Manuel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS Wiki Contribution
On 03/27/2011 03:39 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote: My wetware failure is to blame here - was thinking that only came in with RHEL6 and failed to check; however, a brief article on ext4 the right way would still be worthwhile. Perhaps one of the QA team would test / confirm an ext4 installation, whilst QA'ing C-5.6 ? Looks east . . . Wolfy ? Looks west . . . Phil ? It works fine since C5.4, only that at the time, due to the fact that ext4 was still a technology preview, the required boot option had a slightly different name instead of ext4. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-virt] Vlan trunk/QinQ connected to KVM guest
I'm not sure I'm understanding your problem, but generally I create the vlan interface inside the guests machine. Notice that we use *ONLY* tagged vlan so we can use different vlan in each switch port. B. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] Borré /boot ¿Podría reinstalarlo?
Desde luego, no podría ser de otra manera. Os detallo los pasos que seguí para llegar a buen puerto con el reinicio del servidor: 1. Copiar el /boot de otro servidor (con mismo Software CentoOs 5.5 y mismo nivel de kernel, sin PAE, pero diferente hardware) al servidor donde tuve el incidente. 2. En /boot/grub he linkado manualmente menu.lst a grub.conf para que quede como en la configuración original : menu.lst - ./grub.conf 3. He desinstalado todos los RPM de los kernel que tenía este servidor (incluido el que se ejecuta actualmente) y he instalado manualmente mediante rpm -ivh los siguientes kernel: i. kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.i686.rpm ii. kernel-PAE-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5.i686.rpm **He hecho esto mediante el comando rpm -ivh y no con yum install porque éste comando sólo me instalaba la última versión del kernel-PAE y prefiero tener más opciones por si hubiese problemas ... Para los que no lo sepan, el servidor que sifrió el borrado del /boot tiene instalada una versión del kernel-PAE para reconocer cantidades de RAM 3 Gb. 4. He actualizado luego el kernel con $yum update kernel-PAE subiendo de este modo a la versión kernel-PAE-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5, que era la última versión instalada antes del problema. 5. He revisado la configuración de grub.conf y he modificado el default = 1 (lo dejaba en otra versión de kernel no instalada) para que quede apuntando a la versión kernel-PAE-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 que es el que tenía en ejecución antes del borrado del /boot. Dejo este kernel porque tengo instalado y funcionando en este servidor un par de aplicaciones que dependen de la compilación del kernel (el servicio iscsi-target y una máquina virtual de vmware server) 6. Reinstalo el GRUB, porque he visto en la pruebas realizadas que de no hacerlo la máquina no levanta ya que no encuentra la ruta de instalación del grub: uso este comando: $grub-install --recheck --no-floppy /dev/sda El disco es /dev/sda1 porque así lo veo en fdisk -l 7. Finalmente el sistema quedó configurado así: (14:26:24)[root-/]# ls -lah /boot/ total 18M drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 3.0K Mar 21 14:12 . drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4.0K Mar 18 12:15 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68K Jan 6 2010 config-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68K Jan 6 01:20 config-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5PAE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64K Dec 16 2008 config-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1.0K Jan 22 2010 extlinux drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1.0K Mar 21 14:13 grub -rw--- 1 root root 3.1M Mar 21 13:57 initrd-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE.img -rw--- 1 root root 3.1M Mar 21 13:58 initrd-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5PAE.img -rw--- 1 root root 3.1M Mar 21 13:56 initrd-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE.img drwx-- 2 root root 1.0K May 13 2009 lost+found -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79K Mar 12 2009 message -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 105K Jan 6 2010 symvers-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109K Jan 6 01:20 symvers-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5PAE.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 90K Dec 16 2008 symvers-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 932K Jan 6 2010 System.map-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 947K Jan 6 01:20 System.map-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5PAE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 890K Dec 16 2008 System.map-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.8M Jan 6 2010 vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 166 Jan 6 2010 .vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE.hmac -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.8M Jan 6 01:20 vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5PAE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 166 Jan 6 01:20 .vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5PAE.hmac -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.8M Dec 16 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE (14:26:30)[root-/]# ls -lah /boot/grub total 251K drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1.0K Mar 21 14:13 . drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 3.0K Mar 21 14:12 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15 Mar 21 14:04 device.map -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 63 May 13 2009 device.map.backup -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7.5K Mar 21 14:04 e2fs_stage1_5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7.3K Mar 21 14:04 fat_stage1_5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.6K Mar 21 14:04 ffs_stage1_5 -rw--- 1 root root 943 Mar 21 14:07 grub.conf -rw--- 1 root root 1.2K Mar 18 23:56 grub.conf_BK -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.6K Mar 21 14:04 iso9660_stage1_5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.0K Mar 21 14:04 jfs_stage1_5 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Mar 18 13:21 menu.lst - ./grub.conf -rw--- 1 root root 1.2K Jan 12 13:23 menu.lst_2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.8K Mar 21 14:04 minix_stage1_5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9.1K Mar 21 14:04 reiserfs_stage1_5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 55K Mar 12 2009 splash.xpm.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 512 Mar 21 14:04 stage1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 103K Mar 21 14:04 stage2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7.0K Mar 21 14:04 ufs2_stage1_5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.2K Mar 21 14:04 vstafs_stage1_5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.7K Mar 21 14:04 xfs_stage1_5 (14:27:21)[root-/]# uname -r
[CentOS-es] Centos - Mysql
Consulta, como debo montar el Mysql en centos, para que diferentes puestos de trabajo puedan tener coneccion, actualmente tengo una aplicacion en .net y esta accedediendo a un server 2003, la idea es que acceden a un servidor centos con mysql. Ureta David Gustavo Andres Saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Centos - Mysql
Hola, 2011/3/28 David Ureta uretada...@hotmail.com: Consulta, como debo montar el Mysql en centos, para que diferentes puestos de trabajo puedan tener coneccion, actualmente tengo una aplicacion en .net y esta accedediendo a un server 2003, la idea es que acceden a un servidor centos con mysql. Puedes empezar con http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/como-mysql-quickstart -- Oscar Osta Pueyo oostap.lis...@gmail.com _kiakli_ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Capacidad de Memoria del Kernel
El 24/03/2011 17:32, Juan Pablo Botero escribió: Hola Juan Pablo! Me entró como duda el como saber la capacidad soportada de Memoria RAM del Kernel, si existe algún comando o una herramienta para eso. No conozco ningún comando que te permite conocer la cantidad máxima de memoria con la que puede trabajar Linux, en cualquier caso debes saber que: - Linux sobre x86 puede trabajar con un máximo de 64GB, pero *cada proceso puede utilizar un máximo de 4GB* (importante!). - Linux sobre x86_64 puede trabajar con un máximo de 256GB. Esto es así al menos para RHEL-5, quizás exista algún parche para trabajar con mas memoria.. Saludos, -- Santi Saez http://powerstack.org ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: The slightly longer story... First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time with any success; the 31st guest always failed to boot or crashed during booting, no matter which guest I chose as the 31st. With KVM I chose to add more guests to see if it could be done, with the result that I now have 36 guests running simultaneously. Hmm.. I think I've seen that earlier. I *think* it was some trivial thing to fix, like increasing number of available loop devices or so. Second. I was never able to keep a Windows 7 guest running under Xen for more than a few days at a time without a BSOD. I haven't seen a single crash under KVM. Hmm.. Windows 7 might be too new for Xen 3.1 in el5, so for win7 upgrading to xen 3.4 or 4.x helps. (gitco.de has newer xen rpms for el5 if you're ok with thirdparty rpms). Then again xen in el5.6 might have fixes for win7, iirc. Third. I was never able to successfully complete a PXE-based installation under Xen. No problems with KVM. That's weird. I do that often. What was the problem? Fourth. My main work load consists of a series of builds of a package of about 1100 source files and about 500 KLOC's; all C and C++. Here are the elapsed times (min:sec) to build the package on a CentOS 5 guest (1 vcpu), each time with the guest being the only active guest (although the others were running). Sources come from NFS, and targets are written to NFS, with the host being the NFS server. * Xen HVM guest (no pv drivers): 29:30 * KVM guest, no virtio drivers: 23:52 * KVM guest, with virtio: 14:38 Can you post more info about the benchmark? How many vcpus did the VMs have? How much memory? Were the VMs 32b or 64b ? Did you try Xen HVM with PV drivers? I've been planning to benchmarks myself aswell so just curious. Fifth: I love being able to run top/iostat/etc on the host and see just what the hardware is really up to, and to be able to overcommit memory. xm top and iostat in dom0 works well for me :) -- Pasi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Verify tomcat config
Do you need Tomcat6? It's available over at www.jpackage.org, and will be in CentOS 6. Not that this deals with your issue, but I thought you might appreciate a heads up on its availability as a more contemporary version to aim for. Thanks, Nico, I will stick with CentOS5 onboard tools for now, although the service will undoubtedly move to CentOS6 in the medium term. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null
Hope this email finds you well. I need your advice with something if you can help out. I have an RC serer (selenium rc) which is running on a centos 5.2 and another on a 5.4 machine. if i run it through X server, in other words if i run the server while connected to VNC. it works fine. but if i run it through ssh, it will start normally though upon test execution it will fail with the following error: 11:05:01.571 INFO - Preparing Firefox profile... Error: no display specified 11:05:21.818 ERROR - Failed to start new browser session, shutdown browser and clear all session data java.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out waiting for profile to be created! 11:05:21.833 INFO - Got result: Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null any idea how i can solve this? Thanks, --Roland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] fax software
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:41 -0400, ken wrote: It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5? (Hope so.) Hylafax; has been quietly running at work, without incident, for years. http://www.hylafax.org/content/Main_Page ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS HA problem
Hello,guys: I try to compile heartbeat 3.0.4 from official sources on CentOS 5.5 x86_64 . When I start the heartbeat configuration, I encountered a problem: ./ConfigureMe configure --prefix = /path/hb . . . checking for heartbeat / glue_config.h ... No configure: error: Core development headers not found What is the meaning of that message? In other words, is it the something that had not been installed ? Thanks in advanced.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] lvremove failed on install
Hello, I was trying to install CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD tonight and kept on getting this same error and i have no idea what is causing this annoyance and not letting me complete the install because as soon as this error is produced it says this a bug and should be filed. Before I file a bug report i would like to know if anyone else ran into this and would mind pointing me in the right direction or a link to the solution. The full output is: http://pastebin.com/eEYZigrz i am hoping someone would be able to help, because i have no clue what is going on except that it is failing on trying to remove a volume group. Thanks Steven ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] lvremove failed on install
2011/3/28 Steven Vishoot sir_funz...@yahoo.com: Hello, I was trying to install CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD tonight and kept on getting this same error and i have no idea what is causing this annoyance and not letting me complete the install because as soon as this error is produced it says this a bug and should be filed. Before I file a bug report i would like to know if anyone else ran into this and would mind pointing me in the right direction or a link to the solution. The full output is: http://pastebin.com/eEYZigrz i am hoping someone would be able to help, because i have no clue what is going on except that it is failing on trying to remove a volume group. did you checked that image is correctly burned / downloaded? please check the md5/sha1 sum of dvd disk. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS HA problem
From: sync jian...@gmail.com checking for heartbeat / glue_config.h ... No configure: error: Core development headers not found Google for... glue_config.h JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null
Roland RoLaNd wrote: Hope this email finds you well. I need your advice with something if you can help out. I have an RC serer (selenium rc) which is running on a centos 5.2 and another on a 5.4 machine. if i run it through X server, in other words if i run the server while connected to VNC. it works fine. but if i run it through ssh, it will start normally though upon test execution it will fail with the following error: 11:05:01.571 INFO - Preparing Firefox profile... Error: no display specified 11:05:21.818 ERROR - Failed to start new browser session, shutdown browser and clear all session data java.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out waiting for profile to be created! 11:05:21.833 INFO - Got result: Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null any idea how i can solve this? try ssh -X or ssh -Y . man ssh and man ssh_config (search for forward) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time with any success; the 31st guest always failed to boot or crashed during booting, no matter which guest I chose as the 31st. With KVM I chose to add more guests to see if it could be done, with the result that I now have 36 guests running simultaneously. Hmm.. I think I've seen that earlier. I *think* it was some trivial thing to fix, like increasing number of available loop devices or so. I tried that, and other things, but was never able to make it work. I was using max_loop=64 in the end, but even with a larger number I couldn't start more than 30 guests. Number 31 would fail to boot, and would boot successfully if I shut down, say, #17. Then #17 would fail to boot, and so on. Hmm.. Windows 7 might be too new for Xen 3.1 in el5, so for win7 upgrading to xen 3.4 or 4.x helps. (gitco.de has newer xen rpms for el5 if you're ok with thirdparty rpms). Point taken; I realize this. Third. I was never able to successfully complete a PXE-based installation under Xen. No problems with KVM. That's weird. I do that often. What was the problem? I use the DHCP server (on the host) to supply all address and name information, and this works without any issues. In the PXE case, I was never able to get the guest to communicate with the server for long enough to fully load pxelinux.0, in spite of the bridge setup. I have no idea why; it's not exactly rocket science either. Can you post more info about the benchmark? How many vcpus did the VMs have? How much memory? Were the VMs 32b or 64b ? The benchmark is just a make of a large package of my own implementation. A top-level makefile drives a series of makes of a set of sub-packages, 33 of them. It is a compilation of about 1100 C and C++ source files, including generation of dependencies and binaries, and running a set of perl scripts (some of which generate some of the C source). All of the sources and target directories were NFS volumes; only the local O/S disks were virtualized. I used 1 vcpu per guest and either 512MB or 1GB of memory. The results I showed were for 64-bit guests with 512MB memory, but they were qualitatively the same for 32-bit guests. Increasing memory from 512MB to 1GB made no significant difference to the timings. Some areas of the build are serial by nature; the result of 14:38 for KVM w/virtio was changed to 9:52 with vcpu=2 and make -j2. The 64-bit HVM guests w/o PV were quite a bit faster than the 32-bit HVM guests, as expected. I also had some Fedora diskless guests (no PV) using an NFS root, in which situation the 32-bit guests were faster than the 64-bit guests (and both were faster than the HVM guests w/o PV). These used kernels that I built myself. I did not compare Xen vs KVM with vcpu 1. Did you try Xen HVM with PV drivers? Yes, but I don't have the exact timings to hand anymore. They were faster than the non-PV case but still slower than KVM w/virtio. Fifth: I love being able to run top/iostat/etc on the host and see just what the hardware is really up to, and to be able to overcommit memory. xm top and iostat in dom0 works well for me :) I personally don't care much for xm top, and it doesn't help anyway if you're not running as root or have sudo access, or if you'd like to read performance info for the whole shebang via /proc (as I do). Steve___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server, which has no CD drive. I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server, and can access cobbler-web from my laptop. I have 3 queries about the installation. 1. Is there any advantage is using the 64-bit CentOS rather than 32-bit? 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) But how exactly do I cobbler import these? I see that for Fedora on my laptop I ran sudo cobbler import --path=/mnt/dvd --name=F14-i386 3. Is there actually a way of converting the 7 or 8 CD ISOs into a DVD ISO? I saw instructions that suggested concatenating them, and then running rsync against a DVD ISO, at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-January/104448.html. I tried the site recommended, but could not access the DVD ISO. In fact, if I could access a DVD ISO, couldn't I download it directly? So what would be the point of this exercise? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:49:21PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server, which has no CD drive. I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server, and can access cobbler-web from my laptop. I have 3 queries about the installation. 1. Is there any advantage is using the 64-bit CentOS rather than 32-bit? 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) But how exactly do I cobbler import these? I see that for Fedora on my laptop I ran sudo cobbler import --path=/mnt/dvd --name=F14-i386 3. Is there actually a way of converting the 7 or 8 CD ISOs into a DVD ISO? I saw instructions that suggested concatenating them, and then running rsync against a DVD ISO, at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-January/104448.html. I tried the site recommended, but could not access the DVD ISO. In fact, if I could access a DVD ISO, couldn't I download it directly? So what would be the point of this exercise? Why not use the netinstall ISO rather than download everything? Recreating a DVD image from the ISO's _is_ possible, but honestly, not worth the work, IMHO. Perhaps the LiveCD ISO would be an option as well (I belive you can install from it). x86_64 is useful if you're going to have a lot of memory or large file systems. Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server, which has no CD drive. I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server, and can access cobbler-web from my laptop. I have 3 queries about the installation. 1. Is there any advantage is using the 64-bit CentOS rather than 32-bit? If it runs 64 bit, you should use 64 bit. Unless you also have half the cylinders on your car disabled, and g 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) Dunno. Last time I brought down the DVD iso, I had no trouble just doing a straight d/l, no torrent. snip cobbler question 3. Is there actually a way of converting the 7 or 8 CD ISOs into a DVD ISO? I saw instructions that suggested concatenating them, and then running rsync against a DVD ISO, at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-January/104448.html. I tried the site recommended, but could not access the DVD ISO. Mount the CD isos using loopback (mount -o loop), and copy. snip mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 3/28/2011 9:49 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server, which has no CD drive. I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server, and can access cobbler-web from my laptop. I have 3 queries about the installation. 1. Is there any advantage is using the 64-bit CentOS rather than 32-bit? 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) But how exactly do I cobbler import these? I see that for Fedora on my laptop I ran sudo cobbler import --path=/mnt/dvd --name=F14-i386 3. Is there actually a way of converting the 7 or 8 CD ISOs into a DVD ISO? Cobbler is kind of overkill for a single install. If you can drop the CD iso images under an NFS export, boot from USB and do an nfs install you'll be done before you'd have cobbler set up. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 28/03/11 16:49, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server, which has no CD drive. I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server, and can access cobbler-web from my laptop. I have 3 queries about the installation. 1. Is there any advantage is using the 64-bit CentOS rather than 32-bit? Yes, there are advantages to use 64-bit instead of 32-bit. But it also depends on how much memory you have. If you have more that 4GB RAM, you should really not depend on 32-bit at all. This is a hardware limit on the CPU level. However, Intel did enable some hacks to make it possible to use more than 4GB RAM on the IA32 based CPUs. Those are mostly known as PAE enabled kernels. But few kernel developer really likes PAE. Another limitation is that 32-bit applications have limited memory available compared to a 64-bit application. PAE might even slow down the kernel. Don't go PAE if you can go 64-bit. There are really no good reasons why not to use 64-bit today. There are quite few software packages which is not ready for 64 bit nowadays, and those should rather be fixed than to keep users back on 32 bit. If you for some reason need to run 32-bit user stack, it is even possible to install and a 64 bit kernel on a 100% 32-bit user space. And a running 32-bit applications in a 64-bit setup is possible, as long as you have the 32-bit glibc and other needed support libraries installed. However, 32-bit applications have the same memory limitation when running. For some brief PAE discussion, see here: http://www.held.org.il/blog/2008/07/pae-whats-that-and-how-bad-for-performance/ http://kerneltrap.org/node/3816 http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/32-bit-os-and-4gb-memory-limit-707762/ Having all this said, RHEL supports up to 16GB with PAE on 32bit, thus CentOS will do the same. However, if can avoid it and install 64-bit, I recommend you to do that instead. PAE is really dying, and you'll likely have more issues with PAE than 64-bit in the long run. kind regards, David Sommerseth ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Am 28.03.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Timothy Murphy: I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server, which has no CD drive. I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server, and can access cobbler-web from my laptop. I have 3 queries about the installation. 1. Is there any advantage is using the 64-bit CentOS rather than 32-bit? I'd use 32bit if you are sure you are never going to use more than 2GB RAM. Ever. 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. I don't know what you did, but when I downloaded the torrent, it created only a handful of files. The DVD ISOs are available on my local mirror, so they should be elsewhere, too. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) But how exactly do I cobbler import these? I see that for Fedora on my laptop I ran sudo cobbler import --path=/mnt/dvd --name=F14-i386 Download the DVDs and import them. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) Dunno. Last time I brought down the DVD iso, I had no trouble just doing a straight d/l, no torrent. Where did you find the DVD ISO? When I follow the download instructions at http://www.centos.org/ I am only offered local, ie west european, mirrors, and none of those I looked at had the DVD ISO; all of them just had 8 CD ISOs. Mount the CD isos using loopback (mount -o loop), and copy. snip I didn't follow this. Do you mean mount each of the 8 CDs using loopback? And what exactly am I meant to copy? I need to indicate where cobbler import should look, I assume. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Ray Van Dolson wrote: Why not use the netinstall ISO rather than download everything? How exactly do I do this? I guess I could install it on a USB stick, and boot that on my new server. Is that what you mean? (There is no CD drive on the server.) I can actually run Fedora-14 from a USB stick on the new machine, and have used that to partition the disk. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Am 28.03.2011 um 17:37 schrieb Timothy Murphy: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) Dunno. Last time I brought down the DVD iso, I had no trouble just doing a straight d/l, no torrent. Where did you find the DVD ISO? Here, e.g.: http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/centos/5/isos/x86_64/ I need to indicate where cobbler import should look, I assume. Normally, you loopback-mount the DVDs at /mnt/bla and then you point cobbler at /mnt/bla But, with the 5.5 release consisting of two DVDs, I'm no longer 100% sure how I imported them. Best ask on the cobbler-ML... Rainer___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Les Mikesell wrote: Cobbler is kind of overkill for a single install. If you can drop the CD iso images under an NFS export, boot from USB and do an nfs install you'll be done before you'd have cobbler set up. I'm not sure what you mean by drop the CD iso images under NFS. In any case, I'd prefer to use cobbler, as it seems the simplest way to go, once it is set up, and I'm thinking of installing CentOS-6 later, when it arrives. So I'll repeat my query, which as far as I can see no-one has answered: how do I use cobbler with 8 CD ISOs? To be specific, what exactly do I cobbler import? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Am 28.03.2011 um 17:45 schrieb Timothy Murphy: So I'll repeat my query, which as far as I can see no-one has answered: how do I use cobbler with 8 CD ISOs? To be specific, what exactly do I cobbler import? You don't. You import the DVD(s). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 3/28/2011 10:41 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Ray Van Dolson wrote: Why not use the netinstall ISO rather than download everything? How exactly do I do this? I guess I could install it on a USB stick, and boot that on my new server. Is that what you mean? (There is no CD drive on the server.) Yes, there should be a small boot image along with the isos that you can boot from usb or pxe, then you pick the nfs install method and put in the path to the directory where you downloaded the CD iso images. There are other network install options, but nfs is quick and easy if you've already downloaded the iso images. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:59:23AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/28/2011 10:41 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Ray Van Dolson wrote: Why not use the netinstall ISO rather than download everything? How exactly do I do this? I guess I could install it on a USB stick, and boot that on my new server. Is that what you mean? (There is no CD drive on the server.) Yes, there should be a small boot image along with the isos that you can boot from usb or pxe, then you pick the nfs install method and put in the path to the directory where you downloaded the CD iso images. There are other network install options, but nfs is quick and easy if you've already downloaded the iso images. Yep, or point to an internet-sourced HTTP address and let the install run overnight if you've got a slow connection... One _real_ quick way to join all your CD ISO's together is to use fuse-unionfs on an existing Linux box. Tell it to union each of your loopback mounted ISO mountpoints into a new mountpoint, then export that via NFS to your installation client (or via HTTP). Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 3/28/2011 10:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Cobbler is kind of overkill for a single install. If you can drop the CD iso images under an NFS export, boot from USB and do an nfs install you'll be done before you'd have cobbler set up. I'm not sure what you mean by drop the CD iso images under NFS. I mean download directly into a directory already exported in NFS. Or if they aren't already there, either export the path where they are or copy them to one that is nfs-exported. If you have a linux box and aren't using nfs, that means put the directory (or something above the one containing the files in /etc/exports and 'exportfs -a' or 'service nfs restart'. In any case, I'd prefer to use cobbler, as it seems the simplest way to go, once it is set up, and I'm thinking of installing CentOS-6 later, when it arrives. I can't think of anything much simpler than downloading to a directory and being basically done. Normally on a server with a CD drive I'd burn the 1st CD to boot, but there is a small boot image that you can put on USB to boot into the installer. The nfs install will as for the server (dns name or IP) and the path which will be what you exported or the path to a subdirectory below where the iso files are. CentOS-6 will probably install the same way. The installer knows how to deal with the separate CD iso images directly. I think you have to make an extra link somewhere if you try to install from a dvd image over nfs. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Sometimes the path of least resistance is best, spend $40 on a USB DVD and call it a day. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 3/28/2011 11:13 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: One _real_ quick way to join all your CD ISO's together is to use fuse-unionfs on an existing Linux box. Tell it to union each of your loopback mounted ISO mountpoints into a new mountpoint, then export that via NFS to your installation client (or via HTTP). You don't need to do that. The nfs installer is perfectly happy with a directory containing the CD iso images and it does whatever loopback mount magic it needs for you. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:23:49AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/28/2011 11:13 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: One _real_ quick way to join all your CD ISO's together is to use fuse-unionfs on an existing Linux box. Tell it to union each of your loopback mounted ISO mountpoints into a new mountpoint, then export that via NFS to your installation client (or via HTTP). You don't need to do that. The nfs installer is perfectly happy with a directory containing the CD iso images and it does whatever loopback mount magic it needs for you. Had never tried that. Good to know. Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 03/28/2011 08:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Cobbler is kind of overkill for a single install. If you can drop the CD iso images under an NFS export, boot from USB and do an nfs install you'll be done before you'd have cobbler set up. I'm not sure what you mean by drop the CD iso images under NFS. In any case, I'd prefer to use cobbler, as it seems the simplest way to go, once it is set up, and I'm thinking of installing CentOS-6 later, when it arrives. So I'll repeat my query, which as far as I can see no-one has answered: how do I use cobbler with 8 CD ISOs? To be specific, what exactly do I cobbler import? Cobbler is rather complex to setup. If you want to pxeboot, you can still do this much faster by setting up a tftp server, a dhcp server and exporting the install tree via NFS or HTTP. I simply loop mount the ISO image and export the mounted DVD via NFS. I use something similar to what is described herehttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/PXEInstallMultiDistro In your case, I think I would just follow Les Mikesell's advice and do an NFS install. This is described in the Redhat installation guide. See the sections on Preparing for an NFS install, Selecting an installation Method, and Installing via NFS. Alternatively you can use HTTP instead of NFS. Nataraj ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Cobbler is rather complex to setup. If you want to pxeboot, you can still do this much faster by setting up a tftp server, a dhcp server and exporting the install tree via NFS or HTTP. I simply loop mount the ISO image and export the mounted DVD via NFS. I use something similar to what is described here https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PXEInstallMultiDistro The machine is a glorified netbook, I just can't see why someone would go through THAT much trouble to get it up and running. Like I said before, just buy a USB DVD, and save yourself a lot of grief :P ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 3/28/2011 11:28 AM, Nataraj wrote: Cobbler is rather complex to setup. If you want to pxeboot, you can still do this much faster by setting up a tftp server, a dhcp server and exporting the install tree via NFS or HTTP. I simply loop mount the ISO image and export the mounted DVD via NFS. I use something similar to what is described herehttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/PXEInstallMultiDistro In your case, I think I would just follow Les Mikesell's advice and do an NFS install. This is described in the Redhat installation guide. See the sections on Preparing for an NFS install, Selecting an installation Method, and Installing via NFS. Alternatively you can use HTTP instead of NFS. An nfs install works just by pointing to a directory containing the downloaded CD isos. For http you'd have to loopback-mount or copy the files out on the server side. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] how to do this create the keyset-file for dnssec
it is, I'm coming I do not understand the need to recreate and validate the file keyset-en ... I then recreate a good record with the key in this file and my past signatures are good. I did not understand correctly the operation of dlv keyset files and I recreated downgrade bind to the stable version 9.3 of CentOS 5.5 and using webmin. can you give me the command to use to create files Keyset I did not find any documentation regarding the creation of this type of file how to do this create the keyset-file for dnssec -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7 signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Timothy Murphy wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) Dunno. Last time I brought down the DVD iso, I had no trouble just doing a straight d/l, no torrent. Where did you find the DVD ISO? When I follow the download instructions at http://www.centos.org/ I am only offered local, ie west european, mirrors, and none of those I looked at had the DVD ISO; all of them just had 8 CD ISOs. Ok, I had to search a little, and I am in the US, but I went to the mirror list, and picked from there. A few judicious checks - edu, rackspace, but then I saw supercomputer center, and found a 2-part DVD iso at http://mirrors.arsc.edu/centos/5/isos/x86_64/ Mount the CD isos using loopback (mount -o loop), and copy. snip I didn't follow this. Do you mean mount each of the 8 CDs using loopback? And what exactly am I meant to copy? d/l the .iso's, mkdir /mnt/disk1 /mnt/disk2/... mount -o loop /whereeverIdl/centos_cd_disk1.iso /mnt/disk1 etc. mkdir /mnt/centos_dvd cp -p /mnt/disk1/* /mnt/disk2/*... /mnt/centos_dvd/ I mean, I'm not thinking about this a lot, but if that doesn't work, you could copy the rpms into the directory, or you could try cp -p /mnt/disk1/ /mnt/disk2/... /mnt/centos_dvd/ which would give you disk1... under /mnt/centos_dvd, and burn that onto one or two dvds. I need to indicate where cobbler import should look, I assume. Worked *some* with Spacewalk, not really at all with cobbler, so I can't answer that. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Ray Van Dolson wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:23:49AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/28/2011 11:13 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: One _real_ quick way to join all your CD ISO's together is to use fuse-unionfs on an existing Linux box. Tell it to union each of your loopback mounted ISO mountpoints into a new mountpoint, then export that via NFS to your installation client (or via HTTP). You don't need to do that. The nfs installer is perfectly happy with a directory containing the CD iso images and it does whatever loopback mount magic it needs for you. So is local install: it will ask where for the directory where the images are stored, if you tell it to install from the hd. Does it for my USB key install that I posted last year. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
At Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:37:33 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, but this was a complete failure. It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links to one file, which brought my server down, and left it in a state which was quite hard to clean up.) Dunno. Last time I brought down the DVD iso, I had no trouble just doing a straight d/l, no torrent. Where did you find the DVD ISO? When I follow the download instructions at http://www.centos.org/ I am only offered local, ie west european, mirrors, and none of those I looked at had the DVD ISO; all of them just had 8 CD ISOs. Mount the CD isos using loopback (mount -o loop), and copy. snip I didn't follow this. Do you mean mount each of the 8 CDs using loopback? Yes. And what exactly am I meant to copy? The entire first CD, preserving the directory structure, then copy the contents of the CentOS subdir of the rest of the CDs to the CentOS subdir of the copy. WARNING: for x86_64 system, the resultant directory is too big to fit on a standard 4700MB DVD-R -- you will have to 'skip' some files. The CentOS 5.x x86_64 distro is on 2 DVDs. Just about everything is on the first and the second contains about 400MB worth of openoffice.org langpack files. You probably don't need these (unless you plan on writing documents in many, many, many different languages. I need to indicate where cobbler import should look, I assume. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / hel...@deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software-- http://www.deepsoft.com/ () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
At Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:41:23 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Ray Van Dolson wrote: Why not use the netinstall ISO rather than download everything? How exactly do I do this? I guess I could install it on a USB stick, and boot that on my new server. Actually, since you have already downloaded the 7 or 8 CDs, everything you need is on the first CD (it actually contains a copy of netinstall ISO). Look in the images folder and read the README there. There is a disk image that can be copied to USB stick. Presumably you have some other Linux machine on your LAN that can act as a NFS server -- in which case you just need to put the CD ISOs in some directory and export it read-only, after making sure NFSD is enabled and running (portmap, mountd, nftd, lockd, etc.). Otherwise, the installer can just ftp the rpms one by one off the internet as it goes through the install. Is that what you mean? (There is no CD drive on the server.) I can actually run Fedora-14 from a USB stick on the new machine, and have used that to partition the disk. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / hel...@deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software-- http://www.deepsoft.com/ () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On 28.3.2011 17:36, Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 28.03.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Timothy Murphy: But how exactly do I cobbler import these? I see that for Fedora on my laptop I ran sudo cobbler import --path=/mnt/dvd --name=F14-i386 Download the DVDs and import them. Or import over the net. cobbler import speaks rsync. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rssh / scponly
On 28.3.2011 05:53, Tom Diehl wrote: According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440240 and http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1287.html the ability to chroot was backported into rhel/centos 5 back in 2009-09-02. In addition sshd_config(5) says the following: Subsystem Configures an external subsystem (e.g., file transfer daemon). Arguments should be a subsystem name and a command (with optional arguments) to execute upon subsystem request. The command sftp-server(8) implements the sftp file transfer subsystem. Alternately the name internal-sftp implements an in-process sftp server. This may simplify configurations using ChrootDirectory to force a different filesystem root on clients. By default no subsystems are defined. Note that this option applies to protocol version 2 only. http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20080220110039 might be useful in setting this up. Yes, it is possible to chroot with stock openssh in recent CentOS ! 1. Unfortunately the Match directive is not backported, so the only possibility is to chroot all users including root. 2. The chroot is not restricted to sftp. ssh is chrooted also. 3. All users are chrooted including root I am aware of 2 possible methods to workaround this limitations: Configure 2 ssh daemons, one chrooted for sftp and one default. The chrooted sshd has to listen on another ip or port. Or, alternatively (only one sshd needed) ChrootDirectory %h and change home for root to / (sounds nasty and it is ;-) However you do it, the directory given to ChrootDirectory has to be read-only for normal users. If it were writable the user could manipulate the content of the chroot. Write access has to be restricted to a subdirectory of ChrootDirectory. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Rainer Duffner wrote: The DVD ISOs are available on my local mirror, so they should be elsewhere, too. Where is your local mirror? As I said, I couldn't see them on any of the mirrors offered to me. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote: Rainer Duffner wrote: The DVD ISOs are available on my local mirror, so they should be elsewhere, too. Where is your local mirror? As I said, I couldn't see them on any of the mirrors offered to me. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland kernel.org has the ISOs. http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.5/isos/x86_64/ Ryan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Timothy Murphy wrote: Rainer Duffner wrote: The DVD ISOs are available on my local mirror, so they should be elsewhere, too. Where is your local mirror? As I said, I couldn't see them on any of the mirrors offered to me. The kernel.org mirror system has servers in the EU and has the DVDs. From the link below choose your architecture, download and verify the iso files, and you should be good to go. http://mirrors.eu.kernel.org/centos/5/isos/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null
On 03/28/2011 05:58 AM Roland RoLaNd wrote: Hope this email finds you well. I need your advice with something if you can help out. I have an RC serer (selenium rc) which is running on a centos 5.2 and another on a 5.4 machine. if i run it through X server, in other words if i run the server while connected to VNC. it works fine. but if i run it through ssh, it will start normally though upon test execution it will fail with the following error: 11:05:01.571 INFO - Preparing Firefox profile... Error: no display specified 11:05:21.818 ERROR - Failed to start new browser session, shutdown browser and clear all session data java.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out waiting for profile to be created! 11:05:21.833 INFO - Got result: Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null any idea how i can solve this? Thanks, --Roland Like the error says, you need to specify the display. I.e., on the remote machine you must set the environmental variable DISPLAY... something like (export DISPLAY=192.168.1.42:0.0 firefox) Though this may work, this may well reveal another, different error, one having to do generally with permissions. But we'll take them one at a time. hth. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] finding the right serial port, enabling configuring it [was: Re: fax software]
On 03/28/2011 05:59 AM Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:41 -0400, ken wrote: It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5? (Hope so.) Hylafax; has been quietly running at work, without incident, for years. http://www.hylafax.org/content/Main_Page Thanks everyone for your suggestions. I remember both of these packages from years ago-- the last time I set up a fax. At that time I bought an internal modem-- not a Winmodem, one with jumpers on it to set the com port and I believe the interrupt also. Now, however, I'm working on a laptop with a serial chip on the mainboard and it's a different story. I've been reading the Serial-HOWTO, but it's a huge doc and I hope I don't need to read this entire monograph to get the serial port set up for the modem so that the fax software can use it. I've run minicom to see if I can dial out with it-- to test if I have the modem's serial port enabled and configured properly. So far, no joy. Anyone have tips to set up the modem so that efax or (more likely) hylafax can use it? Much appreciated. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null
On 3/28/2011 2:31 PM, ken wrote: I need your advice with something if you can help out. I have an RC serer (selenium rc) which is running on a centos 5.2 and another on a 5.4 machine. if i run it through X server, in other words if i run the server while connected to VNC. it works fine. but if i run it through ssh, it will start normally though upon test execution it will fail with the following error: 11:05:01.571 INFO - Preparing Firefox profile... Error: no display specified 11:05:21.818 ERROR - Failed to start new browser session, shutdown browser and clear all session data java.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out waiting for profile to be created! 11:05:21.833 INFO - Got result: Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null any idea how i can solve this? Thanks, --Roland Like the error says, you need to specify the display. I.e., on the remote machine you must set the environmental variable DISPLAY... something like (export DISPLAY=192.168.1.42:0.0 firefox) Though this may work, this may well reveal another, different error, one having to do generally with permissions. But we'll take them one at a time. Ssh should take care of exporting the correct tunneled DISPLAY if you specified the -Y option when connecting. However, with firefox you have to be careful that the same user does not already have a copy displaying elsewhere. If so, it will try to open a new window in that session instead of starting a new one. I don't think that's the problem in this case or you wouldn't get the 'no display' error, but when it does happen it can be confusing. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null
Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/28/2011 2:31 PM, ken wrote: I need your advice with something if you can help out. I have an RC serer (selenium rc) which is running on a centos 5.2 and another on a 5.4 machine. if i run it through X server, in other words if i run the server while connected to VNC. it works fine. but if i run it through ssh, it will start normally though upon test execution it will fail with the following error: 11:05:01.571 INFO - Preparing Firefox profile... Error: no display specified 11:05:21.818 ERROR - Failed to start new browser session, shutdown browser and clear all session data java.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out waiting for profile to be created! 11:05:21.833 INFO - Got result: Failed to start new browser session: Error while launching browser on session null snip Two things: first, I assume X is running. Second, did you ssh in with ssh -X? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] finding the right serial port, enabling configuring it [was: Re: fax software]
On 3/28/2011 2:53 PM, ken wrote: It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5? (Hope so.) Hylafax; has been quietly running at work, without incident, for years. http://www.hylafax.org/content/Main_Page Thanks everyone for your suggestions. I remember both of these packages from years ago-- the last time I set up a fax. At that time I bought an internal modem-- not a Winmodem, one with jumpers on it to set the com port and I believe the interrupt also. Now, however, I'm working on a laptop with a serial chip on the mainboard and it's a different story. I've been reading the Serial-HOWTO, but it's a huge doc and I hope I don't need to read this entire monograph to get the serial port set up for the modem so that the fax software can use it. I've run minicom to see if I can dial out with it-- to test if I have the modem's serial port enabled and configured properly. So far, no joy. Anyone have tips to set up the modem so that efax or (more likely) hylafax can use it? I've forgotten most of what I knew about serial ports (and hope to keep it that way...) but chances are that the motherboard ports are /dev/ttyS0 or /dev/ttyS1 and hylafax should be able to do its own initialization. I've always used ckermit to poke around and do manual things to serial ports because after the 'set line device_name' you can 'set carrier off' to keep from locking up when the modem doesn't have carrier yet. I think I had to rebuild a src rpm from somewhere for Centos5, though. It has an odd license and isn't in the distro any more even though the license does explicitly permit that. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] finding the right serial port, enabling configuring it [was: Re: fax software]
At Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:53:50 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On 03/28/2011 05:59 AM Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:41 -0400, ken wrote: It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5? (Hope so.) Hylafax; has been quietly running at work, without incident, for years. http://www.hylafax.org/content/Main_Page Thanks everyone for your suggestions. I remember both of these packages from years ago-- the last time I set up a fax. At that time I bought an internal modem-- not a Winmodem, one with jumpers on it to set the com port and I believe the interrupt also. Now, however, I'm working on a laptop with a serial chip on the mainboard and it's a different story. Is this an RS232 port connected to an external modem or is it some sort of internal modem? I've been reading the Serial-HOWTO, but it's a huge doc and I hope I don't need to read this entire monograph to get the serial port set up for the modem so that the fax software can use it. I've run minicom to see if I can dial out with it-- to test if I have the modem's serial port enabled and configured properly. So far, no joy. Anyone have tips to set up the modem so that efax or (more likely) hylafax can use it? Almost all *internal* modems (esp. on laptops) are Winmodems and are thus pretty close to useless under Linux. It might be easier / cheaper / less agravating to just go down to Best Buy and buy a Creative Blaster analog RS232 serial modem. Something like $50US. Note: most newer laptops don't have an external RS232 connection, so you will need to get a USB=RS232 adapter, most of which work out-of-the-box under Linux. (Don't get a USB connected analog modem -- most of these are Winmodems or something equally odd.) Otherwise, what does: /bin/setserial -g /dev/ttyS* display? (You might need to be root to do this: sudo /bin/setserial -g /dev/ttyS* ) For example my IBM Thinkpad X31 gives this: gollum.deepsoft.com% sudo /bin/setserial -g /dev/ttyS* /dev/ttyS0, UART: undefined, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4 /dev/ttyS1, UART: unknown, Port: 0x02f8, IRQ: 3 /dev/ttyS2, UART: unknown, Port: 0x03e8, IRQ: 4 /dev/ttyS3, UART: unknown, Port: 0x02e8, IRQ: 3 I think /dev/ttyS0 is the IR port, which I don't use. The Winmodem does not show up as a /dev/ttyS* port, since it is not really a serial port at all. Much appreciated. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / hel...@deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software-- http://www.deepsoft.com/ () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos server network speed check???
we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use ping and traceroute to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database, or DELL OPMN tool. The response time is very very slow. This situation normally last 4 to 5 hours then it back to normal. Does there has way to check real network response time so we can show to network engineer. Otherwise they always say no problem. Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice
On 3/27/2011 3:07 PM, Jure Pečar wrote: It's interesting that nobody so far mentioned openVZ I wouldn't use it since being bitten by its lack of swap support. I run a couple of web sites on a fairly heavy web stack which loads up a bunch of dependencies that don't actually end up being used by my site, but because there is no swap, all that unused code eats real RAM. Because of that, I had to upgrade to a 512 MB VPS hosting plan from a 256 MB plan. My sites initially ran just fine under the 256 MB plan but after adding just one feature to my sites which used one of the piggier features in the web stack, it pushed me over the limit and I had to upgrade. If the VPS could use swap, I'm sure enough of the web stack would remain swapped out that I could have continued using the 256 MB plan. My VPS provider may find OpenVZ to be efficient than Xen, but it cost me about 50% more in hosting fees. That's less efficient in my book. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] check memory configuration
What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] check memory configuration
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 05:27:08PM -0400, William Warren wrote: What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) dmidecode -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] check memory configuration
William Warren wrote: What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) lshw, dmidecode, cat'ing files in /proc mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] check memory configuration
On 3/28/2011 5:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: William Warren wrote: What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) lshw, dmidecode, cat'ing files in /proc mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos that lshw gave me the pointer i needed..thanks to all who answered..:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 05:13 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote: we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use ping and traceroute to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database, or DELL OPMN tool. The response time is very very slow. This situation normally last 4 to 5 hours then it back to normal. Does there has way to check real network response time so we can show to network engineer. Otherwise they always say no problem. miitool and ethtool Check that you're running at the right speed; sometimes bad cables will make the negotiation go bad. Sometimes you just connect to the wrong switch port. You may also note if the switch has hard-set values about the negotiation such as duplex settings. Make sure they match on both ends. You should be full duplex unless there's a very very good network reason not to. Lastly, check ifconfig output. Make sure there's no errors reported. If you have a high error count, it's a good bet the cable is bad or the sync settings are wrong. -- Best Regards Peter Larsen Wise words of the day: Showing up is 80% of life. -- Woody Allen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice
Please also consider OpenNode - http://opennode.activesys.org - a CentOS based KVM full virtualization + OpenVZ linux containers solution. Supports VM templating and live migration, etc - with easy bare metal setup. Cheers, -- -- Andres Toomsalu, and...@active.ee On 27.03.2011, at 12:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote: Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2 (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6 will not be out in time for me - I guess KVM would be more mature in CentOS 6. Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.) http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html I would need a tutorial about that... For example, does that run without a host OS? Can it be managed only via Win clients? Issues with CentOS 4/5 guests (all my systems are currently CentOS 4/5). - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hi...@greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
On 3/29/11, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use ping and traceroute to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database, or DELL OPMN tool. The response time is very very slow. Are you connecting to the servers from within the same network/building or via Internet? If the ping times are good, it could be the servers are too heavily loaded, whether due to too many users or inefficient applications. So they would respond very slowly to requests although there is no network problem. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:13 PM, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use ping and traceroute to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database, or DELL OPMN tool. The response time is very very slow. This situation normally last 4 to 5 hours then it back to normal. Does there has way to check real network response time so we can show to network engineer. Otherwise they always say no problem. Thanks. If you run 'iperf' between the 2 servers you will be able to check the bandwidth at that time. It could be that you have another application using all the bandwidth, or the network has slowed down for some other reason. you could also try using Cacti to monitor the bandwidth through the switch. Also install the sysstat package on all servers and let it run every minute. You can graph the data using ksar on your local system. The graphs may show you that something else is going on. Check the crontabs as well. Does the time window line up with when you are running backups or something else over the network? Ping an traceroute are going to be mostly useless for this problem. They can help determine connectivity, but even a 56k modem can be connected and pass. Iperf will stress the bandwidth portion of the equation. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Mark Tomandl wrote: Where is your local mirror? As I said, I couldn't see them on any of the mirrors offered to me. The kernel.org mirror system has servers in the EU and has the DVDs. From the link below choose your architecture, download and verify the iso files, and you should be good to go. http://mirrors.eu.kernel.org/centos/5/isos/ Thank you. I am downloading it now. However, when I go to www.centos.org and click on Downloads=Mirrors=CentOS-5 ISOs=x86_64 I am offered 19 mirrors. I haven't tried them all, but I've tried those in the UK and some others (8 in all) and none of them have the DVD ISOs. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Corporate support for CentOS
on 3/27/2011 5:36 AM Ian Murray spake the following: What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored? (Or only work developing CentOS?) I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job. No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary for 1 or 2 or 3 people to develop CentOS. If they would pay for it, we would likely do it. They might be willing for us to let their current employees do some CentOS things ... but not willing to pay for CentOS development. Sorry, that was just my impression from previous posts. I guess I have that wrong. Maybe I am confusing the reluctance to take donations at the moment with commercial sponsorship. Thanks for correcting me. Couple of questions, then What is the average current time commitment per week, i.e. man hours that is currently volunteered by the core developers? What would that need to increase to, to significantly reduce release times (which I think was the overall goal)? What would the *market rate* be for the skills required? Just to give a rough figure to work with and shouldn't be related to any particular person's current day job. Thanks in advance, Ian. A good linux sysadmin in the US makes from 60K to 80K USD a year... High level programmers a bit more... So with benefits, and other support costs... How about a half million to three quarters of a million a year to commercialize CentOS... In US dollars... Get your checkbook out... Anyone know someone who can front at least 2 years working capital to get started and productive? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Corporate support for CentOS
Anyone know someone who can front at least 2 years working capital to get started and productive? From a pure business standpoint, it would be near impossible to pull off. No one is going to pony up $2,000,000 to start CentOS up as a for-profit company. Aside from the small point that you would be competing with RedHat using its own product, think about it in simple financial terms...let's say we charged each licensee $200/year /machine (and yes at that price we would be competing with RH directly). We would have to sell 5,000 licenses a year just to break even. Bring the price point down to take into account the fact that most users of CentOS can't afford $200/month (or they would probably be using RHEL now..), and your number of conversions goes up exponentially to make up for the low sticker price. Aside from that inconvenient truth, also consider that CentOS does not produce unique products that are protected in any way/shape/form, there is no way to protect the investment or the business from disappearing overnight. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Corporate support for CentOS
$200/month = $200/year ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
Timothy Murphy wrote on 03/28/2011 07:24 PM: However, when I go towww.centos.org and click on Downloads=Mirrors=CentOS-5 ISOs=x86_64 Go to Downloads / Mirrors / Mirror List And look at the column headed Direct DVD Downloads. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
To answer your questios: 1. network is Intranet not internet. 2. servers CPU and I/O are very light. We did use sar -u and sar -b to check. 3. is NOT only one server has this network slow problem. at least 4 to 5 servers on that rack all report slow. it is NOT possible all servers on that rack are all heavy load. --- 11/3/28 (一),Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com 寫道: 寄件者: Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com 主旨: Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check??? 收件者: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 日期: 2011年3月28日,一,下午5:45 On 3/29/11, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use ping and traceroute to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database, or DELL OPMN tool. The response time is very very slow. Are you connecting to the servers from within the same network/building or via Internet? If the ping times are good, it could be the servers are too heavily loaded, whether due to too many users or inefficient applications. So they would respond very slowly to requests although there is no network problem. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
I don't think it is cable problem. The reason are: 1. it happen every 3 to 4 weeks once. 2. problem last 4 to 5 hours then back to normal. 3. not one server has this problem, several servers on that rack all have problem at same time. --- 11/3/28 (一),Peter Larsen plar...@famlarsen.homelinux.com 寫道: 寄件者: Peter Larsen plar...@famlarsen.homelinux.com 主旨: Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check??? 收件者: centos@centos.org 日期: 2011年3月28日,一,下午5:41 On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 05:13 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote: we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use ping and traceroute to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database, or DELL OPMN tool. The response time is very very slow. This situation normally last 4 to 5 hours then it back to normal. Does there has way to check real network response time so we can show to network engineer. Otherwise they always say no problem. miitool and ethtool Check that you're running at the right speed; sometimes bad cables will make the negotiation go bad. Sometimes you just connect to the wrong switch port. You may also note if the switch has hard-set values about the negotiation such as duplex settings. Make sure they match on both ends. You should be full duplex unless there's a very very good network reason not to. Lastly, check ifconfig output. Make sure there's no errors reported. If you have a high error count, it's a good bet the cable is bad or the sync settings are wrong. -- Best Regards Peter Larsen Wise words of the day: Showing up is 80% of life. -- Woody Allen -內含下列夾帶檔案- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
This may seem overly obvious, but have you simply run a netstat while the slowdown occurs to see what the box(es) are doing at that point in time? Alex On 2011-03-28, at 6:32 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: I don't think it is cable problem. The reason are: 1. it happen every 3 to 4 weeks once. 2. problem last 4 to 5 hours then back to normal. 3. not one server has this problem, several servers on that rack all have problem at same time. --- 11/3/28 (一),Peter Larsen plar...@famlarsen.homelinux.com 寫道: 寄件者: Peter Larsen plar...@famlarsen.homelinux.com 主旨: Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check??? 收件者: centos@centos.org 日期: 2011年3月28日,一,下午5:41 On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 05:13 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote: we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use ping and traceroute to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database, or DELL OPMN tool. The response time is very very slow. This situation normally last 4 to 5 hours then it back to normal. Does there has way to check real network response time so we can show to network engineer. Otherwise they always say no problem. miitool and ethtool Check that you're running at the right speed; sometimes bad cables will make the negotiation go bad. Sometimes you just connect to the wrong switch port. You may also note if the switch has hard-set values about the negotiation such as duplex settings. Make sure they match on both ends. You should be full duplex unless there's a very very good network reason not to. Lastly, check ifconfig output. Make sure there's no errors reported. If you have a high error count, it's a good bet the cable is bad or the sync settings are wrong. -- Best Regards Peter Larsen Wise words of the day: Showing up is 80% of life. -- Woody Allen -內含下列夾帶檔案- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
On 3/28/11 7:32 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: I don't think it is cable problem. The reason are: 1. it happen every 3 to 4 weeks once. 2. problem last 4 to 5 hours then back to normal. 3. not one server has this problem, several servers on that rack all have problem at same time. Is this slowness in sustained throughput (big ftp, etc.) or in establishing connections? If the latter you could have a DNS problem, like your first-choice resolver being down or slow. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???
On 3/29/11, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: I don't think it is cable problem. The reason are: 1. it happen every 3 to 4 weeks once. 2. problem last 4 to 5 hours then back to normal. 3. not one server has this problem, several servers on that rack all have problem at same time. Did you note down the exact dates and times of the past few occurrences? Have you checked crontab to see if anything is scheduled to run during those times, e.g. monthly backup set for the wrong time such as 2pm instead of 2am. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Corporate support for CentOS
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:47 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote: Anyone know someone who can front at least 2 years working capital to get started and productive? From a pure business standpoint, it would be near impossible to pull off. No one is going to pony up $2,000,000 to start CentOS up as a for-profit company. Aside from the small point that you would be competing with RedHat using its own product, think about it in simple financial terms...let's say we charged each licensee $200/year /machine (and yes at that price we would be competing with RH directly). We would have to sell 5,000 licenses a year just to break even. Bring the price point down to take into account the fact that most users of CentOS can't afford $200/month (or they would probably be using RHEL now..), and your number of conversions goes up exponentially to make up for the low sticker price. Aside from that inconvenient truth, also consider that CentOS does not produce unique products that are protected in any way/shape/form, there is no way to protect the investment or the business from disappearing overnight. You're just not getting it. The economics of most OSS projects have absolutely nothing to do with fronting capital, forming a company to sell licenses, or scraping together enough donations to hire someone to quit their day job to work on the project. This has happened maybe once or twice in history. I'm talking about existing OSS projects, not something that was always intended to use the freemium model. When one says corporate sponsorship, they are talking about a company with employees able to devote some of their paid time to working on the project. Almost always this paid development also benefits the company, but they also release the work to the project. This is the exact structure that companies like Redhat, IBM, Oracle, Google, Novell, etc... use for their corporate sponsorship of Linux. The .info registrar supports PostgreSQL this way. Discussion of any other type of structure, especially when related to CentOS, is just absurd. Anyone looking to pay someone is going to buy RHEL. Ideally, the big companies using CentOS should be devoting some employee time to CentOS builds, QA, etc... This is the only viable option for a project like CentOS, and is exactly the type of structure Johnny was talking about in an earlier post. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos