Hola muy buenas, he seguido el siguiente tutorial que está muy bien:
http://www.howtoforge.com/setting-up-an-active-active-samba-ctdb-cluster-using-gfs-and-drbd-centos-5.5
El problema, es que cuando bootean los nodos, tiene puesto que en el
archivo /etc/fstab de arranque, monte la partición
Hola,
2011/3/31 Julio Martinez hul...@yahoo.com:
Yurkis,
Sé un poco mas esfecífico con tu problema para ayudarte con mayor facilidad
está iniciando y cuando trata de levantar la interfaz de RED eth0 se me
apaga.
¿Se apaga el computador?
¿Has intentado iniciar en init 1 y luego solamente
Apologies in advance for excerpting or leaving out the messages sent to the
list as i was in digest mode so got them all in one lump.
Rudi Ahlers:
You could assign a LABEL to each hard drive. The LABEL is attached to the
drive's UID (I think?) so even if you move the drive to anther port it
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Cal Sawyer cal.saw...@artsalliancemedia.com
wrote:
Apologies in advance for excerpting or leaving out the messages sent to the
list as i was in digest mode so got them all in one lump.
Rudi Ahlers:
You could assign a LABEL to each hard drive. The LABEL is
The reason for the udev hotplug rule is simply for the purpose of mounting
removable devices as read-only. If udev is left to its devices, everything
plugged up is read-write which is verboten in this application. Unfortunately,
there seems to be no way (i've found) to distinguish, at
Nope sir. Assume never the same device twice and no control over those
devices, so UUID is out of the question.
thank you,
- csawyer
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers
Sent: 01 April 2011 09:24
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: Cal
Hi All,
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID controller. I ran a
smartctl short test on the drive and it failed with a read error. So I ran
the Western Digital's own diagnostic software (DLGDIAG), both the short
and extended test on the drive and it passed with no errors. So
At Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:05:35 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
The reason for the udev hotplug rule is simply for the purpose of mounting
removable devices as read-only. If udev is left to its devices, everything
plugged up is read-write which is verboten in this
On Friday, April 01, 2011 04:23:40 am Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Yes, that's why you assign a LABEL to the device :)
According to the OP's initial message, I think he's already doing this:
SATA system HDD /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /
RAID array LABEL=STORE /store ## mounts ==
One we start our qualification, we might need some help in resolving
issues/defects on CentOS. Can we open a channel or Point of contact who will
be able to help us out with such issues.
I would also request to forward this email to the right forum if the mailing
list we are sending to is
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Nope sir. Assume never the same device twice and no control
over those devices, so UUID is out of the question.
UUID is out of the question where I have 3 drives (main and two backup)
with wear leveling wherein ANY of the drives, put in /dev/sda's
position, is
Nope, no LVM on the RIAD array. It just needs to load right after the main LVM
so that something removable doesn't wiggle its way in and mess up the device
order.
Yes, the suggestion from Robert H looks promising - working on it now. Did i
say i hate udev? I thought there was going to be a
I think that everyone lese lives in a far more ordered universe than i
do. My problem - no, wait - challenge is that i have zero control
over the origin of incoming media on USB and eSATA. Could be any brand
of USB stick sold under the sun or HDDs formatted FAT32, NTFS, ext2/3.
The only
On Friday, April 01, 2011 09:53:06 am Cal Sawyer wrote:
Nope, no LVM on the RIAD array. It just needs to load right after the main
LVM so that something removable doesn't wiggle its way in and mess up the
device order.
Ok, so the LVM line was for the previous filesystem; it wasn't
on 4/1/2011 4:35 AM Steve Brooks spake the following:
Hi All,
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID controller. I ran a
smartctl short test on the drive and it failed with a read error. So I ran
the Western Digital's own diagnostic software (DLGDIAG), both the short
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
with a read error.
What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count, drive
temperature, etc?
___
CentOS
At Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:04:04 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
I think that everyone lese lives in a far more ordered universe than i
do. My problem - no, wait - challenge is that i have zero control
over the origin of incoming media on USB and eSATA. Could be any brand
of
On my CentOS box that I use mainly as a web server, I have iptables
set to log and reject anything that I don't expect. So lately,
I have getting things like this:
Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
DST=192.168.9.20 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=46910 DF
I am trying to mount a logical volume for creating new initrd image.
The lvs command is showing a logical volume with 'd' attribute -
device present without tables. It's getting listed under /dev/mapper
but not under /dev/VolGroup00. Any help on what might be wrong here?
--
thanks,
neuby.r
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my CentOS box that I use mainly as a web server, I have iptables
set to log and reject anything that I don't expect. So lately,
I have getting things like this:
Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
DST=192.168.9.20 LEN=60 TOS=0x00
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine is running fine.. raid array looks good - what
is up with
on 4/1/2011 8:22 AM neubyr spake the following:
I am trying to mount a logical volume for creating new initrd image.
The lvs command is showing a logical volume with 'd' attribute -
device present without tables. It's getting listed under /dev/mapper
but not under /dev/VolGroup00. Any help on
on 4/1/2011 8:32 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:32:16 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Michael D. Berger wrote:
[...]
snip
Not great on this, but *if* I understand it, it's saying that the IP
address of your server is 192.168.9.20, and it's talking to itself, at
destination port 80 - apache, that would
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:32:16 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Michael D. Berger wrote:
[...]
snip
Not great on this, but *if* I understand it, it's saying that the IP
address of your server is 192.168.9.20, and it's talking to itself, at
destination port
Jerry Geis wrote:
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine is running fine.. raid array looks
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:55:37 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
[...]
you might be able to see the process with netstat when it's happening.
I tried that; so far without success.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:55:37 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
[...]
you might be able to see the process with netstat when it's happening.
I tried that; so far without success.
Mike.
Hmmm, maybe lsof.
mark
___
ack, i can feel my hair greying ... again. *But*, i do appreciate your insight
into the future direction of CentOS device handling. Having read this, i'm
going to bite the bullet and dive into smarting-up my udev rules, feeding a
handler script that will decide what to do about what kind of
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:29 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
with a read error.
What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count, drive
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, compdoc wrote:
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
with a read error.
What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count, drive
temperature, etc?
They are clean, no
Brandon Ooi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:29 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
with a read error.
What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector
On 3/24/2011 11:03 AM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I recently installed CentOS 5.5 x86_64 on a brand new ProLiant DL380 G7. I
have identical OS software running reock-solid on two other DL380 ProLiant
servers, but they are G6 models, not G7. On the G7, the
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Jerry Geis wrote:
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine is running fine..
On 1.4.2011 17:20, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my CentOS box that I use mainly as a web server, I have iptables
set to log and reject anything that I don't expect. So lately,
I have getting things like this:
Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:10:58 +0200, Markus Falb wrote:
[...]
Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
DST=192.168.9.20 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=46910 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=56624 DPT=80 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server,
which has no CD drive.
I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server,
and can access cobbler-web from my laptop.
Just to end the story.
Having found the DVD ISO with the help of this newsgroup,
I
Sorry, folks. I wish our release developers well, and hope that they
can open up their processes to allow much needed community involvment.
But I've hopped to Scientific Linux and find it much more usable due
to their willingness to publish updates even without the entire new
release bundled, and
--- On Fri, 4/1/11, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
From: Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Friday, April 1, 2011, 5:46 PM
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP
On 04/01/2011 09:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Sorry, folks. I wish our release developers well, and hope that they
can open up their processes to allow much needed community involvment.
But I've hopped to Scientific Linux and find it much more usable due
to their willingness to publish
On 04/01/11 6:54 PM, Digimer wrote:
I would not fault someone for moving on, but I would when said person
does so in a manner that only leads to unhelpful drama.
yeah, seriously. call the WHAHmbulance.
meh.
___
CentOS mailing list
41 matches
Mail list logo
