On 12/07/2010 06:56 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Baudier said the following on 07/12/10 12:23:
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet.
FastWeb does this in Italy.
They configure
On 12/07/2010 05:13 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 02:26, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/6/10 6:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
You are enjoying a side-effect of NAT by thinking it
is a firewall.
The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite number
On 12/07/2010 04:31 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:51:16AM -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
LOL twice, I'll top-post! (I hate M$ Office, but I'm stuck with it)
Really? In blatant disregard for the published guidelines for
use on this and other
On 12/09/2010 10:30 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 25/11/10 14:12, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
[...snip...]
Will you be confronted with IPv6 in the (not so) near future? Forget
OpenVPN, it is still beta there, while it has been implemented in
strongswan for ages, and part of there standard
Hi,
I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have
sudo.i3861.7.2p1-9.el5_5
installed
I am using the same sudoers file, but the one on box A keeps trying to
do DNS lookups
while the one on box B does not. How do I disable
On 12/10/2010 08:46 AM, Baird, Josh wrote:
Maybe I am missing something here.. but what does 'sudo' have to do
with DNS resolution?
*From:* centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org]
*On Behalf Of *Steve Clark
*Sent:* Friday, December 10, 2010 7:44 AM
*To:* CentOS mailing
On 12/10/2010 09:04 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have
sudo.i3861.7.2p1-9.el5_5
installed
I am using the same sudoers file, but the one on box A keeps trying
On 12/10/2010 10:40 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have
sudo.i3861.7.2p1-9.el5_5
installed
I am using the same sudoers file, but the one
On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/29 John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com:
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
- fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
to 100mb
THAT is a tough
On 12/30/2010 07:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/30 Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com:
On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/29 John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com:
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
- fast enough to do openvpn
On 12/30/2010 07:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/30 Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com:
On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/29 John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com:
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
- fast enough to do openvpn
Hello,
How do I find out what is happening to my packets thru my ipsec tunnel.
They just seem to disappear on the remote side.
I have successfully got the pings thru
when everything has an ipv6 address, but am not successful when trying
to connect two ipv4 lans across an ipv6 ipsec tunnel. All
On 02/08/2011 05:54 PM, Drew wrote:
I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I
have spent 2 days googling with
no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru
an ipv6 ipsec tunnel?
AFAIK, No.
IPv4 IPv6 are different
On 02/09/2011 07:14 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:54 -0800, Drew wrote:
I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I
have spent 2 days googling with
no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru
On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and
omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did
according to reports.
At some point
On 03/08/2011 10:42 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi
Thank you for your help
I type the ifconfig -a
there is ipv6 address
inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1/64 scope link tentative
i also add one
inet6 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 scope global tentative
but both are not pingable by ping6
Here are
was unable to assist further. My tweaks and bundles will now be going
over to Fedora and Scientific Linux, rather than here or in the
developer's list.
Big issue I saw with Scientific Linux was a lack of commitment to long term
support matching what RedHat and Centos provide.
My $.02
Steve Clark
On 04/04/2011 06:47 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 3.4.2011 23:57, Steve Clark wrote:
Big issue I saw with Scientific Linux was a lack of commitment to long
term support matching what RedHat and Centos provide.
This seems to be true.
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
https
Hello,
I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and run into the
following problem. From what I read
-Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I don't see that
flag on in the following. Any ideas?
gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/.wakemain.o.d
On 04/07/2011 09:13 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and run into the
following problem. From what I read
-Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I
On 04/07/2011 10:01 AM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and run into
the following problem. From what I read
-Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I don't see
that flag
On 04/07/2011 10:25 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile RHEL-6 kernel srpm on Fedora 14 and
run into the following problem. From what I read
-Werror flag causes warnings to be treated as errors - but I
don't see that flag on in the
On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Changing the subject line for good ...
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owenlo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting
6.0 RH
On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586
Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any
feedback / suggestions for the
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be
applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an
adjustment.
On 04/08/2011 11:35 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing.
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.
I got a kernel built
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition
On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in
0004586 (thanks). I am
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the
kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011
11:36
files let me try the
On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :)
Akemi
HOORAY - it works.
I got an ipv6 address:
$ ip6 a s eth2
On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the
same thing?
Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result.
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 09/16/2011 08:10 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
On 09/16/2011 06:59 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the
same thing?
Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result.
jerry
On 10/20/2011 01:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi gang - Love CentOS - you guys to a fabulous job.
It has been a while since I saw any update...
I went to twitter.com/centos nothing there,
twitter.com/centos6 nothing there,
went to the qa calendar stuff nothing there.
On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well. It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the next
release. Get used to it. ;)
Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose.
One can't help wondering if the simplicity of the old grub
offended the
On 11/15/2011 09:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
this is what some braindead developers seems to think
but it is not true nor will it never get true!
why in the world should i use a laptop in my
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
public even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout. See example below.
...
rocommunity nobody 127.0.0.1
...
[root@L703108 pgsql]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c
On 11/28/2011 07:41 PM, Corey Henderson wrote:
On 11/28/2011 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community
string public even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout
Hi,
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
I do not see any 3rd party repo offering it.
Me neither.
I am trying to build a syslog server and this version has the capability
to create separate
On 01/24/2012 11:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
I do not see any 3rd party repo offering it.
Me neither.
I am trying to build a syslog server
On 01/24/2012 12:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 05:40 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/24/2012 11:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
I do not see any 3rd
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix but running fsck -y does.
I want to eliminate the -p (preen option) and always do the -y option
On 01/27/2012 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix
On 01/27/2012 12:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some
On 02/01/2012 02:03 PM, Nick wrote:
Hi,
I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route
via
a second network interface.
Given:
- eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1
- eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/24 gateway
On 02/01/2012 04:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default
route via
a second network interface.
Given:
- eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24
On 02/02/2012 05:41 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:28 AM, Nick wrote:
And if it isn't, is there anything I should bear in mind when hacking a
script
to do this sort of thing, in order to avoid breaking my system or generally
fighting against the system's assumptions?
I
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
explicitely list what
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the
On 02/05/2012 10:17 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 02/14/2012 06:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0124
Upstream details at :https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0124.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On 02/15/2012 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/14/2012 09:14 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 02/14/2012 06:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0124
Upstream details at :https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0124.html
The following updated files have been
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz
I am testing, (using ayplus kernel) and get the
On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
Possibly ... Does that processor have PAE? The non-PAE kernel was
dropped, the current 'normal' kernel requires a PAE-capable
On 04/26/2011 09:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/26/2011 07:48 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
Possibly ... Does that processor
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell
servers ATM.
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the
On 05/02/2011 11:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/2/2011 9:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe.
It's about
time.
EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to
have to worry
is this rl0, vr0, em0, fxp0,
On 05/03/2011 09:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/3/11 8:17 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems
pointlessto me
The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops
Fast
On 05/02/2011 10:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain
On 05/05/2011 07:18 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
I have an installation where we're replacing a rather old Linux
box with a new one that has no parallel ports. The old box has
two parallel ports going to Okidata printers.
The IOGEAR GUC1284B USB to Parallel Adapter cable looks like it
might be a
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz
I am
Yes,
We are using one to HE and one to SIXXS. We don't rely on any of the standard
redhat config stuff - we do it all thru our own configs.
Been working great.
On 05/10/2011 11:17 AM, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane
On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the weekend and
it's gone. Up till the reboot,
On 05/10/2011 02:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check
On 05/11/2011 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
Just checking now and still
On 05/12/2011 09:49 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months,
On 05/24/2011 02:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/24/11 10:32 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/24/2011 09:57 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
also you want SSD that has a supercap on its internal cache so pending
writes aren't lost in a power failure scenario.
You know, I've asked people about
On 05/27/2011 05:29 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: aurfal...@gmail.comaurfal...@gmail.com
In Windows and OSX its easy to get TRIM working, does any know of TRIM
for linux?
You apparently need a 2.6.33+ kernel (I read somewhere RH backported what was
needed to their 2.6.32) and an fs like ext4 or
On 05/27/2011 08:28 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
On 05/27/2011 05:29 AM, John Doe wrote:
Test =
https://sites.google.com/site/lightrush/random-1/checkiftrimonext4isenabledandworking
Tested on Fedora (15) and it worked.
Hmmm How do you determine whether TRIM
On 05/27/2011 10:04 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
Unfortunately when I try it on SL 6.0 hdparm gets a segment
violation on the --read-sector command.
The fedora one is 9.36
And the one we used on CentOS 5.6 was 9.37 (compiled it).
Maybe try a more recent
On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/2/2011 3:04 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
I know. But you need to setup sudo for users, I never bothered so far.
It is one of the *first* things I do when I freshly install Linux (*ANY*
distro, both on my machines and anyone else's I set up).
And
On 06/03/2011 06:56 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:52:30AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
And the first thing I do when I need to change something on a system set
up like that is 'sudo su -'... Too lazy to type it more than once
On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has
In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun
OS - I can remember putting things into 3, because X would
On 06/16/2011 12:58 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has
In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun
OS - I can
On 07/12/2011 09:59 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
this machine can boot only from a ... HardDrive. USB is not an
option.
What I did: Move said hard drive to a system that has a DVD, and install
there.
I had to tweak a few things because of how the install
On 07/13/2011 12:46 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 07/12/11 11:53 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.comwrote:
With an HP DL140 we open the cover and temporarily
On 07/15/2011 02:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
(in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
under CentOS-6, but I'm
On 07/17/2011 09:32 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
I want to get a look at Cents-6
The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the
same
On 07/18/2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 7/18/2011 11:25 AM, ?? ?? wrote:
So do you typically provide helpful answers to forum questions sooner
after they are posted when you have to forum-hop than you would if they
land in your inbox or later?
Obviously some level of activity must be
On 07/18/2011 02:37 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 07/18/2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 7/18/2011 11:25 AM, ?? ?? wrote:
So do you typically provide helpful answers to forum questions sooner
after they are posted when you have to forum-hop than you would if they
land in your inbox or later
On 07/19/2011 10:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I finally switched workstations, and am running into a lot of truly
annoying details with CentOS 6, and the software with it. For one, I'm
doing this by webmail, and this version of Firefox *insists* on putting
what I'm typing in gray, rather than
On 07/29/2011 07:48 AM, Thomas Harold wrote:
On 7/28/2011 5:01 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to
headers, whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt
will use the subject line as well to thread messages.
Apple Mail does that
On 08/01/2011 03:23 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:44 AM -0500 cbul...@gmail.com wrote:
We are trying to track some specific rules using LOG as target.
Everything is working well but the problem is that iptables is flooding
the console with LOG messages.
In
On 08/18/2011 11:10 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
To route a subnet in ipv6 there are two possibilities:
-add route commands for the subnet in each computer
-or use neighbor proxy in the router server
I prefer neighbor proxy.
So I have to activate neighbor proxy in the router:
sysctl -w
On 08/25/2011 09:18 AM, ken wrote:
On 08/25/2011 08:47 AM Timothy Murphy wrote:
I don't think that is necessary;
this newsgroup does not seem to me to be over-loaded
with OT material, or indeed with material of any kind.
Splitting it would just be a nuisance, in my case at least.
Surely it is
On 08/25/2011 11:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 25, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 08/25/2011 11:00 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
Could we have a centos-offtopic list please, so anything
that would be considered OT can be posted there?
Hello List,
I found these wonderful instruction by Alan Bartlett (thanks Alan) for
building a kernel.org kernel
that would install on CentOS 5.5. Doing this and moving the resulting .rpm
to the target system and doing a rpm -ivh ... works great.
Now I am trying to use the same rpm as part of
On 10/05/2010 05:30 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
I found these wonderful instruction by Alan Bartlett (thanks Alan) for
building
a kernel.org kernel
that would install on CentOS 5.5. Doing this and moving the resulting .rpm
to the target system
On 10/06/2010 06:05 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
I realize that uname is missing as well as /sbin/new-kernel-pkg. That is why
I was asking if someone has a recipe for building a kernel from
kernel.org that will install correctly from a respin.
You
On 10/18/2010 04:18 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 22:06, Alexander Dallozad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
The daemon is bound to localhost only.
Yes, that would be a problem!
What could I be missing? The logs are clean.
postconf -e 'inet_interfaces = all'
On 10/20/2010 01:53 PM, Peter Crighton wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:25:26 -0700, you wrote:
on 10-6-2010 2:27 PM Robert Heller spake the following:
At Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:33:25 +0100 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
My system is:
Intel CC820 motherboard
On 10/20/2010 02:13 PM, cen...@crighton.me.uk wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:04:51 -0400, you wrote:
To get mine to work under fedora I had to run ethtool and turn on the
wol option.
Also it seemed to get reset after used wol to start it up so in my
rc.local I put
/sbin/ethtool -s eth1 wol
Hi,
I have been looking for a conntrack-tools rpm for Centos 5.5. Does
anyone know of one?
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Sr. Software Engineer III
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
On 11/27/2010 09:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:23:34PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
The working system in that analogy is software, not necessarily nor
even likely to be the kernel itself. But yes, it can trash a
production critical web or software application
Hi,
Does anyone have the CERT SiLK tools packaged for CentOS 6.x?
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
On 03/16/2012 12:26 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
Does anyone have the CERT SiLK tools packaged for CentOS 6.x?
If npbpdy did, they provide a spec file, and there are old instructions on
how to build a rpm...
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
