2011/2/6 Poh Yong Hwang yong...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have an issue. I have already resize the partition using Gparted. Now how
can i resize the actual image size in virtual manager? I do not see any
option for me to change the size of the allocated hard disk.
You're probably looking for the
2011/2/6 Poh Yong Hwang yong...@gmail.com:
Hi Kenni,
Sorry i might have miss it but if i do a man of qemu-img, i do not see
resize option. I only see create, convert, commit and info.
Ohh, I'm sorry then :( Guess the qemu-img version in CentOS 5 just is too old...
qemu-img *is* the tool you
2011/2/6 Thomas Smith theitsm...@gmail.com:
I am coming into this discussion a little late, so apologies if I ask for
any information previously provided.
I can help you with this, but I'll need to know the domU's file system
layout to do so. Can you send the output of the following commands?
2010/11/18 Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi:
Hello,
If you're interested in running Xen 4.0 hypervisor/dom0 on RHEL6,
take a look at here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial
It explains steps needed to rebuild Xen 4.0.1 src.rpm from Fedora on RHEL6,
and how to fetch dom0 capable
2010/11/19 Nick oinksoc...@letterboxes.org:
The problem with this is that it is obviously more of a constraint to have two
physical CPUs available. Therefore adding virtual CPUs to a co-scheduled VM
can
actually make performance worse if the physical CPUs are under any sort of
contention.
Do you have a rule of thumb as to how many core to assign
to a guest? For instance, with an Intel x5650 with 6 real
and 12 hyperthreaded cores, how many cores would you assign
to the guest?
It fully depends on the load of your guests and how many guests you
want/need to run on a single
2010/11/19 Nick oinksoc...@letterboxes.org:
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 18/11/10 23:45, Kenni Lund wrote:
The good thing about KVM compared to other virtualization solutions,
is that KVM doesn't try to reinvent the wheel. It leaves scheduling to
the Linux kernel, so whatever your Linux
2010/11/14 MargoAndTodd margoandt...@gmail.com:
On 11/13/2010 07:44 AM, compdoc wrote:
$ uname -r -m
2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 i686
$ rpm -qa \*kvm\*
kvm-36-1
kmod-kvm-36-3
Not even close to 83. :-(
My centos 5.5 has kvm 83. I'm not sure how you got that old stuff
I am 32 bit.
yum
2010/11/13 MargoAndTodd margoandt...@gmail.com:
On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
You'll never need to run it from the command line, use the available
management tools (libvirt+virsh from the command line,
libvirt+virt-manager from X11), it makes your life much much easier.
I've been
2010/11/13 MargoAndTodd margoandt...@gmail.com:
On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
No, you're not running an old version of qemu-kvm in CentOS. Like most
other packages, Red Hat has selected an (old and stable) version as
the baseline version and then backported bugfixes and new
2010/11/13 Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org:
kvm-83. That said, as you've probably already read in the docs, KVM is
a technology preview in RHEL 5.x...6.0 will be the first version
with official/stable KVM support by Red Hat.
My understanding is that KVM was tech preview in RHEL/CentOS 5.4
2010/11/11 MargoAndTodd margoandt...@gmail.com:
On 11/10/2010 08:31 PM, Mark Pryor wrote:
--- On Wed, 11/10/10, jaye...@gmail.comjaye...@gmail.com wrote:
From: jaye...@gmail.comjaye...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?
To: Discussion about the
2010/10/2 Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com:
what I would like to know what is the latest KVM that I can run with 5.5 and
Run the qemu-kvm version included with CentOS and use the KVM modules
included in the default CentOS kernel - these versions are tweaked to
work the best in CentOS/RHEL.
what
2010/7/27 cris rock quenerovi...@hotmail.com:
On the /var/log/libvirt/qemu/p3k0401.log:
LC_ALL=C PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin HOME=/
/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -M rhel5.4.0 -m 1024 -smp 1 -name p3k0401
-uuid 7658c102-0738-724c-40eb-e1c58b2c2369 -domid 3 -nographic -monitor
pty
2010/5/28 Marcelino Mata mm...@multimatic.com:
Has anyone had any success getting WinXP 32bit to use 4 CPU's under
Centos 5.5 KVM?
I have tried everything and the best I can get is 2 CPU's. I tried
everything listed here
http://www.linux-kvm.com/content/running-windows-smp-guests I am
2010/5/28 compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com:
Maybe the part about netfilter?
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking
The part about disabling netfilter on bridges?
It is already done, line 78-80:
http://pastebin.com/jtTrHLqA
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
2010/5/27 Veiko Kukk ve...@ekp.ee:
On 05/27/2010 12:21 PM, Aleksei Miheev wrote:
Is it typo?
There can be no subnet with /32 bit mask, it's single host only.
Actually, it is possible:
ip addr add xxx.yyy.zzz.215/32 dev eth0
ip route add xxx.yyy.zzz.193 dev eth0
ip route add default via
Hi
Is it expected behaviour that a libvirt NAT-based network is faster
than a libvirt routed network?
I would guess that the routed network would be the fastest one in all
cases, but I'm seeing the opposite in my setup. On a 100mbit internet
connection, the routed network tops at 4mbyte/sec,
2010/2/20 S.Tindall tindall.sat...@brandxmail.com:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 02:41 +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
2010/2/18 compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com:
I would also just use the e1000 emulation. Theres nothing
better about the virtio devices...
...other than lower CPU utilization and higher
.
Do your own testing if in doubt.
Best Regards
Kenni Lund
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
on top of a
Linux filsystem, the qcow2 solution seems much nicer :) Especially now
when the qcow2 performance has been highly optimized:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KVM_qcow2_Performance
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1659.html
Best Regards
Kenni Lund
2009/12/12 Christopher G. Stach II c...@ldsys.net:
- Kenni Lund ke...@kelu.dk wrote:
I'm also very interested in how to make backups of Windows guests on
LVM. But will the shadow copy feature in amanda not only backup the
files within the Windows machine? I don't think I fully understand
2009/12/2 Kenni Lund ke...@kelu.dk:
2009/12/2 Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com:
I am wondering if KVM is ready for production
for running a Windows Server 2003 32 bit guest.
SNIP
Well, the drivers works just fine for 64 bit guests, but they're
tricky to install in their current form
2009/11/10 James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca:
So, it would appear as if kvm-qemu-img is intended as a lightweight
replacement for the full qemu package where all the functionality of
the latter is not required. However, as I wish to use virt-manager
clearly the full qemu package is
2009/11/9 James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca:
Further, do I need tun/tap to host VMs that themselves support
virtual ips? The module for tun I found as part of the base install.
But I cannot locate the module for ethertap and yum does not tell
me where it is found.
Yep, you do want
2009/11/10 James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca:
On Tue, November 10, 2009 09:16, Kenni Lund wrote:
You need to configure your virtual machine to use a shared device,
eg. your bridge. If your client gets a 192.168.122.x address, you've
setup your virtual machine to use usermode networking
address if you have a DHCP server or
assign a static IP inside the virtual machine.
Best Regards
Kenni Lund
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
27 matches
Mail list logo
