Hi folks
As mentioned in the subject, kernel-3.18.12-11 is missing firmware files
required to run Broadcom/Qlogic network cards, driven by bnx2x driver.
While in the source-rpm, there is a bnx2/bnx2x firmware tgz being
applied during the rpm build, along with a patch adding these firmware
Hi all
On 07/07/2015 10:30 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/07/2015 12:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
[ loads of stuff deleted ]
OH .. I see, I did not get the firmware files, but their git pointer info :)
I will rebuild and repost.
Please try the packages that are now in the same
On 06/17/2015 04:24 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
At long last, I'd like to announce beta packages for CentOS 7,
available from the community build system.
Great to see Xen coming to CentOS 7 !
I gave the virtx7-44-testing packages a spin on a fresh CentOS 7 install
(legacy boot, no efi, as
On 09/07/2015 12:40 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/04/2015 04:39 PM, T.Weyergraf wrote:
On 09/03/2015 09:50 PM, Chuck Meade wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Hi Chuck
This may be old news at this point, but I had 100% identical behavior
to yours when I tried virtx7-44-testing.
After looking around a bit
Hi
I gave the new Xen-4.6rc2 a spin on a CentOS 7 virtualisation guest
(nested-xen). I haven't yet started testing guests, but rather looked at
the install itself.
One issue, I found, was with xenstored.service and the corresponding
unit-file:
[root@xencen7ws ~]# systemctl status
On 09/03/2015 09:50 PM, Chuck Meade wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Hi Chuck
This may be old news at this point, but I had 100% identical behavior to yours
when I tried virtx7-44-testing.
After looking around a bit I tried "virtx7-44-candidate", in a sibling
directory to virtx7-44-testing. It has a
On 09/08/2015 01:02 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:02 PM, T.Weyergraf <t.weyerg...@virtfinity.de> wrote:
First of all, I fully agree, that forked repos are undesirable. However, to
the casual observer (like me), there are hardly any ressources for Xen on
Ce
Hi all,
i just stumbled over a strange performance issue with my Xen setup.
I use centos-virt Xen since a long time on my workstation and usually
never check performance. However, yesterday I booted into the 3.18.25-19
Dom0 kernel *without* Xen and found the system noticably more
responsive.
On 04/11/2016 12:34 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:20 AM, T.Weyergraf <t.weyerg...@virtfinity.de> wrote:
[...my stuff deleted...]
Thanks for the report. 64-bit PV is known to be slow for Xen for
workloads that involve a lot of system calls (which kernel build
cer
Hi
So far, I did some preliminary testing using nested virt:
host(L0): Fedora 25, kernel-4.9.11-200, kvm+qemu
Guest(L1): CentOS 7 Xen-4.6.3-7, kernel-4.9.11-22
So far, at least the L1 setup had no issues. I'll need to pull L1
guest-storage from backup to test some L2 guests.
Likewise, I
:
Hello, is this kernel is also for KVM hosts? If not, will be? I use
elrepo now...
T.Weyergraf wrote:
Hi
So far, I did some preliminary testing using nested virt:
host(L0): Fedora 25, kernel-4.9.11-200, kvm+qemu
Guest(L1): CentOS 7 Xen-4.6.3-7, kernel-4.9.11-22
So far, at least the L1 setup had
Hi
I wonder, if live migration (back and forth) is possible on mixed
Haswell (Xeon V3) and Broadwell (Xeon V4) installations. The only
notable difference between the two is apparently a working TSX
implementation on V4, which got disabled on V3 due to bugs. The rest
(VMCS-shadowing, posted
Hi
I am attempting to setup Xen 4.10 with kernel 4.9.86-30 (
virt7-xen-410-testing, virt7-common-testing ) on CentOS7
After installing everything, the machine was unable to boot and hung in
dracut stating it could not find its root device.
The testsystem I use is a somewhat aged Dell M915
13 matches
Mail list logo
