Re: [CentOS] I cannot add user to a group permanently

2016-10-16 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/16/2016 04:57 AM, Xuwen Fang wrote: I'm using a centos 7 server. I tried to add my own user to group 'apache' and it works temporarily. When I ssh to it later, I found my user not a member of group 'apache'. What's wrong with it? Are you using "newgrp"? That tool starts a new session

[CentOS] I cannot add user to a group permanently

2016-10-16 Thread Xuwen Fang
Hello Everyone, I'm using a centos 7 server. I tried to add my own user to group 'apache' and it works temporarily. When I ssh to it later, I found my user not a member of group 'apache'. What's wrong with it? Thanks. Sincerely, Xuwen ___ CentOS

[CentOS] Database Modeling Tools

2016-10-16 Thread H
I am looking for an open-source database modeling tool, ideally to run under both CentOS and Windows. I have not used any such tool before so I would like to solicit suggestions. Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Sound problem, possibly Mate Volume Control

2016-10-16 Thread Fred Smith
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 09:18:01PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 05:02:55PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:49:53 -0400 > > Fred Smith wrote: > > > > > Any clues? I still haven't any clues, but now the volume control is working. I did a reboot this

Re: [CentOS] Database Modeling Tools

2016-10-16 Thread Jason Bailey
BeaverDB might be a good fit if you don't mind that it's written in Java. I actually find myself using Valentina Studio these days. It's not open source, but it is free, and it's written in Qt, and is multi-platform. Jason On Oct 16, 2016 1:38 PM, H wrote: I am looking

Re: [CentOS] Database Modeling Tools

2016-10-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/16/2016 1:48 PM, Frank Cox wrote: I don't know what the difference is between database modelling and an actual database they are completely different things. Modeling is a database design tool, typically letting you design your table relations via a GUI tool, generating an

Re: [CentOS] Database Modeling Tools

2016-10-16 Thread H
On October 16, 2016 4:16:28 PM EDT, Jason Bailey wrote: >BeaverDB might be a good fit if you don't mind that it's written in >Java. > >I actually find myself using Valentina Studio these days. It's not open >source, but it is free, and it's written in Qt, and is

Re: [CentOS] Database Modeling Tools

2016-10-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 15:38:32 -0400 H wrote: > I am looking for an open-source database modeling tool, ideally to run under > both CentOS and Windows. I have not used any such tool before so I would like > to solicit suggestions. I don't know what the difference is between database modelling and

Re: [CentOS] Database Modeling Tools

2016-10-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:03:41 -0700 John R Pierce wrote: > Modeling is a database design > tool, typically letting you design your table relations via a GUI tool, Gosh, I never knew such things existed. I guess I've never done anything sufficiently complex that I would need a tool like that.

[CentOS] iptables on C5

2016-10-16 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi all, I am trying to get iptables to work for me... I am running asterisk (11.23.0) on a C5 machine. Working fine on port 5060 udp. I have need to tcpenable=yes SIP and run that on port 5068. Since port 5060 is already running I was going to redirect 5068 to 5060. So I thought I could use

Re: [CentOS] iptables on C5

2016-10-16 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/16/2016 05:39 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I am running asterisk (11.23.0) on a C5 machine. Working fine on port 5060 udp. I have need to tcpenable=yes SIP and run that on port 5068. Since port 5060 is already running I was going to redirect 5068 to 5060. Oh, yuck. SIP includes information

[CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-16 Thread マスターズ　イアン
Hi I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to CVE-2016-2776. According to https://www.isc.org/downloads/, version 9.8.x is End-of-Life (EOL) as of Sep 2014. Regards ian ___

Re: [CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-16 Thread Eero Volotinen
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2776 check versions against centos package numbers :) -- Eero 2016-10-17 8:28 GMT+03:00 マスターズ イアン : > Hi > > I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 > (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to

Re: [CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/16/2016 10:28 PM, マスターズ　イアン wrote: I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to CVE-2016-2776. According tohttps://www.isc.org/downloads/, version 9.8.x is End-of-Life (EOL) as of Sep 2014. Red Hat continues to