[CentOS] X module not loading

2020-03-25 Thread Jerry Geis
HI - On CentOS 8 I see this in my X log intel: waited 2020 ms for i915.ko driver to load I find this: find . | grep i915.ko ./4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko.xz uname -r 4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64 Why might it not be loading ? Thanks, Jerry _

Re: [CentOS] X module not loading

2020-03-25 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 25.03.20 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry Geis: HI - On CentOS 8 I see this in my X log intel: waited 2020 ms for i915.ko driver to load I find this: find . | grep i915.ko ./4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko.xz uname -r 4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64 Why might it not

[CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
Hi, I've discovered a bug in rsync which leads to increased CPU usage and slower transfers in many situations. When syncing with compression (-z), certain file types should not be compressed during the transfer because they are already compressed. The file types which are not to be compressed can

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:49:24 +0100 Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > Hi, > > I've discovered a bug in rsync which leads to increased CPU usage and > slower transfers in many situations. > > When syncing with compression (-z) Tbh, using -z with rsync is almost always a bad idea (unless you're on

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Leroy Tennison
Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. From: CentOS on behalf of Peter Kjellström Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 9:34 AM To: Simon Matter Cc: centos@centos.org Subjec

[CentOS] CentOS 6.10 bind DNSSEC issues

2020-03-25 Thread Support
Hi,     Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues this afternoon. At 16:26 (GMT) had alerts for DNS failures against our CentOS 6.10 bind DNS servers from our monitoring system. Sure enough DNS requests via the server was failing, checking the named.log showed dns

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.10 bind DNSSEC issues

2020-03-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:03:23 + CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi, > >     Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server > issues Yes. The installed ISC DLV key installed with bind-9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.3.x86_64 seems to have expired and there does not appear t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.10 bind DNSSEC issues

2020-03-25 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Robert Heller said: > Yes. The installed ISC DLV key installed with > bind-9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.3.x86_64 seems to have expired and there does not > appear to be a new bind-9.8.2 RPM with a new key. I guess you can *manually* > fetch a new key (look in the installed /etc/nam

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Pete Biggs
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:39 +, Leroy Tennison wrote: > Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you > provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. > I think the "rationale" is that at some point the compression/decompression takes longer than the time r

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Leroy Tennison wrote: Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. I can't speak to that, but the obvious workaround is to use ssh's compression instead of rsync's: rsync -av -e 'ssh -C'

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:39 +, Leroy Tennison wrote: >> Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you >> provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. >> > I think the "rationale" is that at some point the > compression/decompression takes longer than th

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Leroy Tennison wrote: > >> Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you >> provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. > > I can't speak to that, but the obvious workaround is to use ssh's > compression instead of rsync's: > > rsync -

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Pete Biggs
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 19:15 +0100, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:39 +, Leroy Tennison wrote: > > > Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you > > > provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. > > > > > I think the "ratio

Re: [CentOS] X module not loading

2020-03-25 Thread Jerry Geis
Would seem its foundl. lsmod | grep i915 i915 2207744 13 intel_gtt 20480 1 i915 i2c_algo_bit 16384 1 i915 drm_kms_helper217088 1 i915 drm 524288 10 drm_kms_helper,i915 video 45056 1 i915 ___

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Leroy Tennison
That's why I asked, I wanted to know if there was something inherently bad with "-z". I had a situation where Postgresql was replicating 16M files every few minutes ("log shipping") on approximately 10 systems, got behind which resulted in almost continuous file transfer (of mostly null 16M fil

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Leroy Tennison
I appreciate the reply - it keeps me from wondering "is there something I should be concerned about?". We use a co-location facility where we pay for bandwidth utilization so it's still an issue. From: CentOS on behalf of Pete Biggs Sent: Wednesday, March 25,

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 25.03.20 um 19:15 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS: On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:39 +, Leroy Tennison wrote: Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. I think the "rationale" is that at some point the co

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:49:24PM +0100, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > Hi, > > I've discovered a bug in rsync which leads to increased CPU usage and > slower transfers in many situations. > > When syncing with compression (-z), certain file types should not be > compressed during the transfer

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:49:24PM +0100, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've discovered a bug in rsync which leads to increased CPU usage and >> slower transfers in many situations. >> >> When syncing with compression (-z), certain file types should not be >> compressed during the t

Re: [CentOS] Need help to fix bug in rsync

2020-03-25 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> I appreciate the reply - it keeps me from wondering "is there something I > should be concerned about?". We use a co-location facility where we pay > for bandwidth utilization so it's still an issue. Hi, You are right, bandwidth always costs, always. Who pays for it can differ a lot, but ther