oh nice, seems that they upgraded php to 5.3? no more 5.1
Am 09.11.10 20:55, schrieb Morten P.D. Stevens:
2010/11/9 Scott Robbinsscot...@nyc.rr.com:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html
So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :)
2010/11/10 Juergen Gotteswinter j...@internetx.de:
oh nice, seems that they upgraded php to 5.3? no more 5.1
No, that are additional packages. (called bind97 and php53)
For example:
yum install bind97-utils or
yum install php53-mysql
The old versions continue to be supported by Red Hat.
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:22:55AM -0700, Greg Bailey wrote:
Join the Red Hat executive team on November 10th, 2010 for a live video
webcast.
Register now.
If I was a betting person, I'd put my money on November 10... at least
For what it's worth...for those who haven't seen.
2010/11/9 Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html
So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :)
Hi,
RHEL 5.6 Beta:
- bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
- PHP 5.3 - support for namespaces
That sounds
Dne 17.9.2010 22:16, Tom Bishop napsal(a):
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 17.9.2010 22:16, Tom Bishop napsal(a):
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:22:55AM -0700, Greg Bailey wrote:
Join the Red Hat executive team on November 10th, 2010 for a live video
webcast.
Register now.
If I was a betting person, I'd put my money on November 10... at least
the CentOS devs have a couple of days to get the FAQ set up
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:51:39 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
[]
Redhat does not discuss release dates []
Well, the beta is up :
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
so the corporate experience on this list may be able now to make an
educated guess (still an unofficial guess,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, BeartoothHOS wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:51:39 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
[]
Redhat does not discuss release dates []
Well, the beta is up :
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
that is already the *second* beta of RHEL 6, so it's not really
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 07:08:30PM +, BeartoothHOS wrote:
Well, the beta is up :
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
It's been up for many months; in fact this is the second beta
cut.
so the corporate experience on this list may be able now to make an
educated
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
When it is ready and not a second before.
I would suggest you ask upstream but
Thanks and Yes and I agree and know that, but I was just wondering if they
had a potential target date.I have read September and also October but
was wondering if any of that was more than speculation
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep
On 9/17/2010 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
When it is ready and not a second before.
Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
On 9/17/2010 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:14:19PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Thanks and Yes and I agree and know that, but I was just wondering if they
had a potential target date.I have read September and also October but
was wondering if any of that was more than speculation
It's *all*
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I thought that was the debian mantra. And also the reason we don't use it.
Who is this we you speak of? What I posted was the hard cold
truth of the matter. Redhat does not discuss release dates
with the
16 matches
Mail list logo
