On 01/22/2013 10:19 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
Where should MDS server be placed, in the cluster network or in the
public network with MONs ?
It should be located in the public network since clients need to be able
to interact with it.
Wido
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On 01/22/2013 11:18 PM, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
Hi List,
Here is part of /etc/init.d/ceph script:
case $command in
start)
# Increase max_open_files, if the configuration calls for it.
get_conf max_open_files 8192 max open files
if [
On 01/23/2013 10:44 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
2013/1/23 Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl:
It should be located in the public network since clients need to be able to
interact with it.
Ok.
Cluster network is only needed by OSDs ? No other devices should be
able to access it ?
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
too big (default is 300). Recommended 50.. let's see how that goes.
Even smaller (20 or 25) would probably be fine.
I set it to 50, and that seems to have solved all my problems.
After a day or so my cluster got
On 01/23/2013 01:14 PM, Jens Kristian Søgaard wrote:
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
too big (default is 300). Recommended 50.. let's see how that goes.
Even smaller (20 or 25) would probably be fine.
Going through the code and reading that
Hi Wido,
Going through the code and reading that this solved it for Jens, could
this issue be traced back to less powerful CPUs?
Depends on what you mean by less powerful.
All my OSD servers are equipped with Xeon E5606 CPUs. That is a
quad-core 2.13 Ghz CPU.
They are not used for
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
Hi list,
When first time I start my ceph cluster,it takes more than 15
minutes to get all the pg activeclean. It's fast at first (say 100pg/s) but
quite slow when only hundreds of PG left peering.
Is it a common situation? Since
Hello All;
I have been trying to associate a directory to a data pool (both called
'Media') according to a previous thread on this list. It all works except the
last line:
ceph osd pool create Media 500 500
ceph mds add_data_pool 3
added data pool 3 to mdsmap
mkdir /mnt/ceph/Media
cephfs
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 01/23/2013 01:14 PM, Jens Kristian S?gaard wrote:
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
too big (default is 300). Recommended 50.. let's see how that goes.
Even smaller (20 or 25) would
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
On 1/19/2013 12:16 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
We generally recommend the KVM+librbd route, as it is easier to manage the
dependencies, and is well integrated with libvirt. FWIW this is what
OpenStack and CloudStack
Dimitri,
For what it's worth I also stepped through the process of spinning up
Ceph and OpenStack on a single EC2 node in a recent blog entry:
http://ceph.com/howto/building-a-public-ami-with-ceph-and-openstack/
It has some shortcuts (read: not meant to be production) but it may
help give you a
On 01/22/2013 01:20 PM, Cong Ding wrote:
The variable str is used as both the source and destination in function
snprintf(), which is undefined behavior based on C11. The original description
in C11 is:
If copying takes place between objects that
overlap, the behavior is
Hi Yan,
I pushed this one to next, thanks. BTW what are you using to reproduce
this? We'd like to continue to improve the coverage of
ceph-qa-suite.git/suites/fs.
Thanks!
sage
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
commit 1174dd3188 (don't retry
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:48:07AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
On 01/22/2013 01:20 PM, Cong Ding wrote:
The variable str is used as both the source and destination in function
snprintf(), which is undefined behavior based on C11. The original
description
in C11 is:
If copying takes
On 01/23/2013 11:41 AM, Cong Ding wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:48:07AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
On 01/22/2013 01:20 PM, Cong Ding wrote:
The variable str is used as both the source and destination in function
snprintf(), which is undefined behavior based on C11. The original
description
These patches contains some autoconf fixes/cleanups.
Danny Al-Gaaf (2):
configure: fix RPM_RELEASE
configure: remove -m4_include(m4/acx_pthread.m4)
configure.ac | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Use git to get RPM_RELEASE only if this is a git repo
clone and if the git command is available on the system.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de
---
configure.ac | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to configure RadosGW but actually, radosgw doesn't start.
I've followed this guide:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/config/
Apache configuration is OK and i've added the following
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/23 Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com:
try
# radosgw -n client radosgw.gateway
Still doesn't work.
whoops, was missing a period there.
# radosgw -n client radosgw.gateway
error parsing
This seems to be working ok for the most part, but I noticed that
using large files gives errors getting them (but not putting them).
The problems start after 2GB which, as you said, is larger than should
be used in this method. It shouldn't affect us since we shouldn't be
using this for files
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Cesar Mello cme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this question is too off-topic. I am a Windows guy with no much
knowledge about Linux.
I have successfully installed a Rados Gateway through apt-get in a virtual
machine. Now I would like to build and
Thanks so much Yehuda!
Best regards!
Mello
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Cesar Mello cme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this question is too off-topic. I am a Windows guy with no much
knowledge about Linux.
I
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
I set it to 50, and that seems to have solved all my problems.
After a day or so my cluster got to a HEALTH_OK state again. It has been
running for a few days now without any crashes!
Hmm, one of the OSDs crashed
Now that I built from the sources I think I got stuck in this too. The logs:
root@l3:/etc/ceph# cat /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log
2013-01-23 19:05:42.233438 7ff3dae2c780 0 ceph version
0.56-395-g371e6fb (371e6fbed624ececb385663a59dad907e9153d6a), process
radosgw, pid 3811
2013-01-23 19:05:43.937851
I just recently found out that ceph has some python bindings (yay!).
I see there are a couple of examples for using the rbd bindings here:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/librbdpy/
But that doesn't really include much about the librados bindings. Are
there any examples for that? For example I'm
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Cesar Mello cme...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that I built from the sources I think I got stuck in this too. The logs:
root@l3:/etc/ceph# cat /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log
2013-01-23 19:05:42.233438 7ff3dae2c780 0 ceph version
0.56-395-g371e6fb
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/23 Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com:
I've solved. Ceph primary keyring should be also placed on radosgw.
On radosgw these two files are needed:
/etc/ceph/ceph.conf (the
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Jens Kristian Søgaard
j...@mermaidconsulting.dk wrote:
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
I set it to 50, and that seems to have solved all my problems.
After a day or so my cluster got to a HEALTH_OK state again.
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Paul Sherriffs wrote:
Hello All;
I have been trying to associate a directory to a data pool (both called
'Media') according to a previous thread on this list. It all works except the
last line:
ceph osd pool create Media 500 500
ceph
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Yue Li wrote:
Hi,
i have some questions about ceph.
ceph provide a POSIX client for users.
for aio-read/write, it still use page cache on client side (seems to
me). How long will the page cache expire (in case the data on server
side has
On 01/23/2013 10:19 AM, Patrick McGarry wrote:
http://ceph.com/howto/building-a-public-ami-with-ceph-and-openstack/
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Sam Lang sam.l...@inktank.com wrote:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-openstack/
These are both great, I'm sure, but Patrick's page says I
On Jan 23, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
On 01/23/2013 10:19 AM, Patrick McGarry wrote:
http://ceph.com/howto/building-a-public-ami-with-ceph-and-openstack/
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Sam Lang sam.l...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Danny -
These two patches are now in the wip-rpm-update-2 branch. Will merge into
master after build test.
Thanks,
Gary
On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
Since we use already AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, no need to include m4/acx_pthread.m4
extra.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf
Hi,
When running the PutObject sample from
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/csharp/ I get a
MethodNotAllowed response. Please has anyone successfully run this
sample?
I have tested with a current local build (0.56).
Thank you a lot for the attention!
Best regards
Mello
--
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Cesar Mello cme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When running the PutObject sample from
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/csharp/ I get a
MethodNotAllowed response. Please has anyone successfully run this
sample?
I have tested with a current local build (0.56).
Re-sending this due to plain text limitations:
Are you just testing a build following the 5 min guide? I did this
today, and the method not allowed just meant that apache wasn't
acutally set up to call rados gateway via rewrite. I verified this by
placing an index.html in /var/www and seeing that
Yes the radosgw log shows the request. The handler-get_op call is
returning null at rgw/rgw_main.cc (RGWProcess::handle_request).
I've confirmed putting this log:
if (!op) {
req-log(s, get_op failed!);
abort_early(s, -ERR_METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED);
goto done;
}
I'm pasting a copy of
On 01/24/2013 01:17 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Yan,
I pushed this one to next, thanks. BTW what are you using to reproduce
this? We'd like to continue to improve the coverage of
ceph-qa-suite.git/suites/fs.
My scripts delete the test directory after finishing a round of fsstress
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Cesar Mello cme...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes the radosgw log shows the request. The handler-get_op call is
returning null at rgw/rgw_main.cc (RGWProcess::handle_request).
I've confirmed putting this log:
if (!op) {
req-log(s, get_op failed!);
Oh man now it works perfectly! Thank you so much!!!
Just added the line 'rgw dns name=l3' to the [client.radosgw.gateway]
section of ceph.conf.
Best regards
Mello
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Cesar Mello
On 01/23/2013 06:17 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
...
http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/rpm/
http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-start/
Between those two links my own quick-start on CentOS 6.3 was maybe 6 minutes.
YMMV.
It does, obviously, since
Deploy the configuration
...
2. Execute the
Hi Nick-
The problem here looks to just be that do_get() in rados.cc isn't making
any attempt to read large objects in chunks. I'm not sure where the 2GB
limit is, but it well beyond non-optimal before it gets to that point.
That function needs to read in chunks of a few MB and keep going
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Jens Kristian S?gaard wrote:
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
I set it to 50, and that seems to have solved all my problems.
After a day or so my cluster got to a HEALTH_OK state again. It has been
running for a few
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Jens Kristian S?gaard
j...@mermaidconsulting.dk wrote:
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
I set it to 50, and that seems to have solved all my problems.
After a
Try wip-rados-get
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Nick-
The problem here looks to just be that do_get() in rados.cc isn't making
any attempt to read large objects in chunks. I'm not sure where the 2GB
limit is, but it well beyond non-optimal before it gets to that point.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Jens Kristian S?gaard
j...@mermaidconsulting.dk wrote:
Hi Sage,
I think the problem now is just that 'osd target transaction size' is
I set
46 matches
Mail list logo
