Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-23 Thread Mark Nelson
On 02/22/2015 11:09 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Mark Nelson mnel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, I wrote up a short document describing some tests I ran recently to look at how SSD backed OSD performance has changed across our LTS releases. This is just looking at

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-22 Thread Haomai Wang
I don't have detail perf number for sync io latency now. But a few days ago I did single OSD single io depth benchmark. In short, Firefly Dumpling Hammer per op latency. It's great to see Mark's benchmark result! As for pcie ssd, I think ceph can't make full use of it currently for one OSD. We

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-22 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Mark Nelson mnel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, I wrote up a short document describing some tests I ran recently to look at how SSD backed OSD performance has changed across our LTS releases. This is just looking at RADOS performance and not RBD or RGW. It also

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-18 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
-devel ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: ceph-users ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com Envoyé: Mardi 17 Février 2015 18:37:01 Objet: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison Hi All, I wrote up a short document describing some tests I ran recently to look at how SSD

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-18 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison Hi Alex, Thanks! I didn't tweak the sharding settings at all, so they are just at the default values: OPTION(osd_op_num_threads_per_shard, OPT_INT, 2) OPTION(osd_op_num_shards, OPT_INT, 5) I don't have really good insight yet

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-18 Thread Mark Nelson
: Mark Nelson mnel...@redhat.com À: ceph-devel ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: ceph-users ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com Envoyé: Mardi 17 Février 2015 18:37:01 Objet: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison Hi All, I wrote up a short document describing some

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-18 Thread Mark Nelson
-devel@vger.kernel.org *Cc: *ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com *Sent: *Tuesday, 17 February, 2015 5:37:01 PM *Subject: *[ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performancecomparison Hi All, I wrote up a short document describing some tests I ran recently

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-17 Thread Stephen Hindle
I was wondering what the 'CBT' tool is ? Google is useless for that acronym... Thanks! Steve On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Mark Nelson mnel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, I wrote up a short document describing some tests I ran recently to look at how SSD backed OSD performance has changed

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-17 Thread Mark Nelson
Hi Stephen, It's a benchmark automation tool we wrote that builds a ceph cluster and then runs benchmarks against it. It's still pretty rough (no real error checking, no documentation, etc). We have some partners that are interested in using it too and I'd like to make it useful for the

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

2015-02-17 Thread Stephen Hindle
Awesome! Thanks Much! On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Mark Nelson mnel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Stephen, It's a benchmark automation tool we wrote that builds a ceph cluster and then runs benchmarks against it. It's still pretty rough (no real error checking, no documentation, etc). We