On 12/03/2015 10:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:02:12PM +0100, Javier Muñoz wrote:
>> I would appreciate to know the current status of the implementation if
>> possible. Any progress? Any 'deadline' to go upstream? :)
>
> When:
> As soon as it works 100% and passes my
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:02:12PM +0100, Javier Muñoz wrote:
> I would appreciate to know the current status of the implementation if
> possible. Any progress? Any 'deadline' to go upstream? :)
When:
As soon as it works 100% and passes my testsuite, which I hope is very
soon. I would very much
Hi,
I would appreciate to know the current status of the implementation if
possible. Any progress? Any 'deadline' to go upstream? :)
Thanks in advance!
Javier
On 07/31/2015 10:21 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm busy travelling and wrapping other things up, but will resume major
> work on
I'm busy travelling and wrapping other things up, but will resume major
work on this in August, probably week 2/3, depending on other
interrupts/priorities.
It's almost complete, the only missing features are:
- error page fetcher gets confused on conditional requests (I think a
different
- Original Message -
From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub yeh...@redhat.com
To: Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan LaCour
jonathan.lac...@dreamhost.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 4:07:44 PM
Subject: Re: RGW S3 Website hosting, non-clean code
- Original Message -
From: Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan LaCour jonathan.lac...@dreamhost.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 2:33:25 AM
Subject: RGW S3 Website hosting, non-clean code for early review
Hi,
As an extension
Hi,
As an extension of earlier work done by Yehuda [1], I've gotten the
great majority of the work done to support static website hosting in
RGW, just like AmazonS3 [2].
I need to do some cleanups of the code prior to major review for
submission, and solve one thorny problem first, have a few
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:30:19PM -0400, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
Either I have to repeat a lot of code for it, which I'm not happy about,
or I have to refactor RGWGetObj* to more safely made the second GET
request for the error object (and make sure range headers etc are NOT
used
- Original Message -
From: Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org
To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub yeh...@redhat.com
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan LaCour
jonathan.lac...@dreamhost.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 4:04:49 PM
Subject: Re: RGW S3 Website hosting, non-clean code
