On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:51 AM, David Disseldorp wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:57:46 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:37 PM, David Disseldorp wrote:
> ...
>> > Ping, any feedback on the patch?
>>
>> The patch itself looks OK, except for
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:37 PM, David Disseldorp wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 16:43:09 +0200, David Disseldorp wrote:
>
>> Allows for xattr retrieval. Response data buffer allocation is the
>> responsibility of the osd_req_op_xattr_init() caller.
>
> Ping, any feedback on the
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 16:43:09 +0200, David Disseldorp wrote:
> Allows for xattr retrieval. Response data buffer allocation is the
> responsibility of the osd_req_op_xattr_init() caller.
Ping, any feedback on the patch?
Cheers, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:57:46 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:37 PM, David Disseldorp wrote:
...
> > Ping, any feedback on the patch?
>
> The patch itself looks OK, except for the part where you rename a local
> variable for no reason, AFACT.
Thanks for the