Re: ceph-qa analysis output

2015-01-18 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Yuri, I did not know about scrape. It looks extremely useful, thanks ! Do you have more magic items in your bag ? ;-) Cheers P.S. And thanks to John for writing scrape :-) On 18/01/2015 01:27, Yuri Weinstein wrote: Sounds good, Loic Are you aware BTW about scrape tool written by John

Re: ceph-qa analysis output

2015-01-17 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Hi Loic, I'd love to. Let's chat on Monday to finalize format. ( PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced, e,g. '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed old_pg_num jobs,... issue RE description (this I

Re: ceph-qa analysis output

2015-01-17 Thread Loic Dachary
On 17/01/2015 23:08, Yuri Weinstein wrote: Hi Loic, I'd love to. Let's chat on Monday to finalize format. ( PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced, e,g. '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED

Re: ceph-qa analysis output

2015-01-17 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Sounds good, Loic Are you aware BTW about scrape tool written by John Spray? https://github.com/jcsp/scrape I use it for test runs analysis often. Just FYI Thx YuriW On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote: On 17/01/2015 23:08, Yuri Weinstein wrote: Hi Loic,

ceph-qa analysis output

2015-01-17 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Yuri, It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readable. For instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed old_pg_num) (duplicate of