On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
On 4 November 2014 01:50, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
In the Ceph session at the OpenStack summit someone asked what the CephFS
survey results looked like.
Thanks Sage, that was me!
Here's the link:
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng z...@redhat.com
---
fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 16 +++
include/linux/ceph/auth.h | 26 +
include/linux/ceph/ceph_features.h | 1 +
include/linux/ceph/messenger.h | 9 +-
include/linux/ceph/msgr.h | 8 ++
Session key is required when calculating message signature. Save the session key
in authorizer, this avoid lookup ticket handler for each message
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng z...@redhat.com
---
net/ceph/auth_x.c | 18 +++---
net/ceph/auth_x.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+),
OK, I will solve it if free. It's a problem when one connection want
to replace existing connection for the same endpoint.
Thank you!
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
could you run ceph -w --debug-ms=10/10 ?
Here the output. (monitor ips are
This is initialized but never used.
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com
---
include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h | 1 -
net/ceph/osd_client.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
index
2 bytes of what was reserved space is now used by
userspace for the compat_version field.
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com
---
include/linux/ceph/msgr.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/msgr.h b/include/linux/ceph/msgr.h
This is useful in our automated testing, so that
we can verify that the barrier is propagating
correctly between servers and clients.
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com
---
fs/ceph/debugfs.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/debugfs.c b/fs/ceph/debugfs.c
Version 2 includes the new osd epoch barrier
field.
This allows clients to inform servers that their
released caps may not be used until a particular
OSD map epoch.
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com
---
fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 13 +
fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 8 ++--
2
To allow us to abort writes in ENOSPC conditions, instead
of having them block indefinitely.
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com
---
include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h | 8 +
net/ceph/osd_client.c | 67 +
2 files changed, 75
While cancelling, we store the OSD epoch at time
of cancellation, this will be used later in
CAPRELEASE messages.
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com
---
fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 21 +
fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:34 PM, John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com wrote:
To allow us to abort writes in ENOSPC conditions, instead
of having them block indefinitely.
I just saw the word cancel, and as we've had trouble in this area in
libceph in the past, a couple nit-pickings.
First, in my
Hi Mark,
Is it today ? (11/4/2014 from you mail subject)
or tommorow (2014-11-05 in etherpad)
- Mail original -
De: Mark Nelson mark.nel...@inktank.com
À: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Novembre 2014 16:16:32
Objet: 11/4/2014 Weekly Ceph Performance Meeting IS ON!
Hi
Hi Alex,
Doh! Sorry everyone, Alex is right! 11/5/2014!
I will resend and fix.
Mark
On 11/04/2014 09:21 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
Hi Mark,
Is it today ? (11/4/2014 from you mail subject)
or tommorow (2014-11-05 in etherpad)
- Mail original -
De: Mark Nelson
Hi All,
Got the date wrong the first time. 11/5/2014 is correct! 8AM PST as
usual. We are going to try a little experiment and leave the Agenda
blank for you guys to fill in. If you are planning on attending and have
something you want to discuss, please add it!
We've also added a
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:36:07 +1100, Blair Bethwaite
blair.bethwa...@gmail.com wrote:
TBH I'm a bit surprised by a couple of these and hope maybe you guys
will apply a certain amount of filtering on this...
fsck and quotas were there for me, but multimds and snapshots are what
I'd consider
Agreed Multi-MDS is a nice to have but not required for full production use.
TBH stability and recovery will win any IT person dealing with filesystems.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Mariusz Gronczewski
mariusz.gronczew...@efigence.com wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:36:07 +1100, Blair Bethwaite
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Blair Bethwaite
blair.bethwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 November 2014 01:50, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
In the Ceph session at the OpenStack summit someone asked what the CephFS
survey results looked like.
Thanks Sage, that was me!
Here's the link:
On 04/11/14 22:02, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
On 4 November 2014 01:50, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
In the Ceph session at the OpenStack summit someone asked what the CephFS
survey results looked like.
Thanks Sage, that was me!
Here's the link:
Hi Ceph,
While at the OpenStack summit Dan Bode spoke highly of Consul (
https://consul.io/intro/index.html ). Its scope is new to me. Each individual
feature is familiar but I'm not entirely sure if combining them into a single
software is necessary. And I wonder how it could relate to Ceph.
subject all ceph-dev maillist
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I concur with Dan on Consul. It's a great tool.
We use Consul in our Ceph environments but only as a layer above an
installed Ceph installation. Health checks (for the mons/osds
processes and ceph health) and service discovery (for the
apps/services that run in Docker containers on top). We've
Hi Sage,
I am now working with the BP osd: update Transaction encoding, but the
Transaction::get_data_alignment make me confused.
This method give the alignment which is used by FileJournal to do
better buffer build. It calculate the alignment by largest_data_off
and get_data_offset() while the
22 matches
Mail list logo
