On Monday, May 26, 2014 10:05 AM, Guang Yang yguan...@outlook.com wrote:
Hello Loic and Koleos,
Do we have any wiki page documenting the progress and report of this effort?
We are very interested in such as well.
Thanks,
Guang
On May 8, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
Hi,
I'm looking for the simplest workaround for a bug in the reload implementation
of upstart as shipped with Ubuntu raring. It manifests itself by loosing track
of the exec process. If it does not ring a bell, the steps to reproduce from
a fresh Ubuntu raring installation are here :
could disclose her/his identity
to RedHat or any other trusted third party. Do you see any reason why RedHat
would object to this ?
Cheers
On 19/05/2014 17:13, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Richard,
It was nice seeing you at the OpenStack summit. Do not hesitate to redirect
if this question
Hi Richard,
It was nice seeing you at the OpenStack summit. Do not hesitate to redirect if
this question is best answered by someone else at RedHat. As most of us I'm
still unsure who at RedHat has time to devote to Ceph ;-)
Koleos Fuskus koleosfus...@yahoo.com would like to contribute code
Anyway, I would like to receive advice on this topic. It may be convenient for
me to do contributions using my real name. I am not aware of the copyright
problems that I may have for using alias.
Best,
koleos
On Monday, May 19, 2014 5:19 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi
Best,
koleos
On Monday, May 19, 2014 5:19 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Richard,
It was nice seeing you at the OpenStack summit. Do not hesitate to redirect
if
this question is best answered by someone else at RedHat. As most of us I'm
still unsure who at RedHat has time
Hi Sahid,
Here are the files implementing the bloom filter we discussed tonight
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/common/bloom_filter.hpp
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/common/bloom_filter.cc
and the associated unit tests
Hi Florent,
Here is a low hanging fruit for you to walk through the Ceph contribution
process:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7725
I'm announcing it on the development mailing list so that it is not taken from
you ;-)
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
with your prototype implementation?
It was possible to distribute in this way, indeed. But there is no support for
the implied parity idea. I wonder how that would fit.
Cheers
Cheers Andreas.
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 09 May
Hi Andreas,
The implied parity bloc mentionned page 4 of
http://anrg.usc.edu/~maheswaran/Xorbas.pdf is something we've not discussed in
the context of the implementation of the pyramid erasure code plugin. I'm not
sure if it would be useful to have. Do you have an opinion ?
Cheers
--
Loïc
Hi Veronica,
I was really happy to hear you're going to work on the erasure code reliability
model. Unless I'm mistaken your action plan was not published. Would you mind
adding it to the wiki so I can comment on it ? Someone else might be interested
to contribute too. I've had a discussion
josh.dur...@inktank.com
7 11 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
87 Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com
95 John Wilkins john.wilk...@inktank.com
105 João Eduardo Luís joao.l...@inktank.com
115 Babu Shanmugam a...@enovance.com
124 Warren
, the details are at the end of this
mail.
Commits by authors
1 1144 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
2 449 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
3 379 Samuel Just sam.j...@inktank.com
4 200 Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
5 161 Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
this community bonding phase (I don't remember how google calls
this for GSoC participants ;-)
Cheers
Cheers,
Verónica
On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 8:12 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Veronica,
I was really happy to hear you're going to work on the erasure code
reliability
Hi,
There are two rendez-vous points already, although not specifically for the
Ceph foundation topic:
Meetup sunday 11th, evening
http://www.meetup.com/Ceph-in-Atlanta/events/174131332/
Ceph developers session tuesday 13th, 11:15-14:40 http://sched.co/1kczSZy
It would be great if we could
Hi Ceph,
This month Ceph User Committee meeting was about:
Elections
RedHat and Inktank
CephFS
Meetings
You will find an executive summary at:
https://wiki.ceph.com/Community/Meetings/Ceph_User_Committee_meeting_2014-05-02
The full log of the IRC conversation is also
Hi Babu,
The hypervisor running http://brag.ceph.com/ has been rebooted this morning and
it looks like it's back and in good shape. Please let me know if you see
something wrong.
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Ceph co-developers,
I wrote down a few ideas about what I'd like the Ceph Foundation to provide,
from a developer perspective :
https://wiki.ceph.com/Development/Foundation
This is no more than a wishlist, feel free to add whatever you have in mind ;-)
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan
Hi Ceph,
This month Ceph User Committee meeting proposed agenda is at
https://wiki.ceph.com/Community/Meetings#Proposed_topics:
Feel free to add what you would like to discuss.
Date: May 2nd, 2014
Time:
18:00-19:00 UTC
14:00-15:00 US-Eastern
12:00-13:00 US-Mountain
I'll deal with the problems found in gf-complete:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8083
On 12/04/2014 06:06, Sage Weil wrote:
Several new defects. This wasn't running for the last couple of weeks
because the submodules didn't update on the test checkout.
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel
of this
mail.
Commits by authors
1 182 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
2 94 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
3 70 Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
4 44 Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de
5 24 David Zafman david.zaf...@inktank.com
6 21 John
Hi Kevin,
The following patch is initializing the array in a lock protected / not thread
sensitive part of code.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1621/files
Unless I'm mistaken, it ensures that it never happens automagically. The first
few tests that were run indicate it's not more broken
?
There is no easy way to use the logs / events to significantly reduce the
randomness of the workload ? I honestly have no clue ;-)
Cheers
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
It would
-kevin
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 06/04/2014 18:28, Kevin Greenan wrote:
Hey Loic,
Did this stuff start happening after a specific commit (or commits)? I
see this bug was opened 6 days ago
thread safety.
Cheers
On 07/04/2014 20:29, Loic Dachary wrote:
[re-adding the list for the record]
On 07/04/2014 19:53, Kevin Greenan wrote: Hey Loic,
BTW, you can get an illegal instruction fault if you are calling an
intrinsic that is not supported on a particular platform. Is the code
...@inktank.com
mailto:s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 02/04/2014 19:44, Kevin Greenan wrote:
Hey Loic,
Are you ensuring that Jerasure (actually gf-complete) is getting
memory buffers aligned on 16-byte boundaries? Without
Hi Ceph,
It would be nice to have a way to replay the random events injected by stanzas
such as
- thrashosds:
chance_pgnum_grow: 2
chance_pgpnum_fix: 1
When a teuthology workload (such as tracker.ceph.com/issues/7914#note-34)
crashes once a week and the error is not obvious, it would
Hi Ceph,
This month Ceph User Committee meeting was about:
Tiering, erasure code
Using http://tracker.ceph.com/
CephFS
Miscellaneous
You will find an executive summary at:
https://wiki.ceph.com/Community/Meetings/Ceph_User_Committee_meeting_2014-04-03
The full log of the
Hi Kevin,
In the context of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7914 we're trying to figure
out why jerasure dumps core. We don't know how to reproduce it yet (ran dozens
of identical tests suites with no such crash in the past few days, which is to
be expected for rare bugs because the test suite
are the best ;-)
On 02/04/2014 19:35, Loic Dachary wrote: Hi Kevin,
In the context of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7914 we're trying to figure
out why jerasure dumps core. We don't know how to reproduce it yet (ran
dozens of identical tests suites with no such crash in the past few days
/ErasureCodeJerasure.cc#L108
I'll re-read this logic tomorrow just to be sure.
Cheers
I can have a deeper look later today or tomorrow.
-kevin
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Kevin,
In the context of http
Hi,
I'll work on it right now.
Cheers
On 01/04/2014 02:38, Sage Weil wrote:
Hey Loic,
A new failure came up in QA over the weekend that looks like a problem
inside jerasure:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7914
I think this is the first time this particular failure has come up.
Nice catch ! https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1569
On 30/03/2014 16:58, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
I'm not sure it's worth fixing : https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1563
Line 25 in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1563
The gf-complete + jerasure tests run fine on Ubuntu saucy 32 bits. The problem
is when trying to compile on a 32 bits machine as shown here
http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-tarball-precise-i386-basic/log.cgi?log=cb624fc9ed1e891e51cc0d20622d43f6fcd08cd5
On 28/03/2014 18:15, Loic
On 29/03/2014 17:16, Kevin Greenan wrote:
Hey Loic,
I'll take a look on Monday. I'll create a VM to try and reproduce (and
hopefully fix) this.
I'm not sure it's worth fixing : https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1563
Thanks!
-kevin
On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:08 AM, Loic Dachary wrote
Hi Kevin,
Someone mentionned a problem (no more information at the moment ;-) about
running jerasure / gf-complete on a 32 bits machine. Does that ring a bell ?
I'll try it out with the test method you suggested:
'gf_methods w -A -U' to run all of the tests for w=[4,8,16,32,64,128]. Then,
I
indeed. Created
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7869
Cheers
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Kevin Milosz,
So it would be
if(sse4 sse3) = use a plugin compiled with sse + sse3 + sse4 activated
else if(sse3) = use a plugin with sse2 + sse3 activated
On 26/03/2014 19:44, Milosz Tanski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Kevin Milosz,
So it would be
if(sse4 sse3) = use a plugin compiled with sse + sse3 + sse4 activated
else if(sse3) = use a plugin with sse2 + sse3 activated but not sse4
Hi Kevin,
Although https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete does not have explicit #if
related to AVX http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions , it is
used when the compiler supports it (
...@guerby.net wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 10:56 +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Laurent,
Hi Loic,
It occurs to me that all we're after is to enable SSE functions such as
_mm_set_epi32. We're not trying to have the binary optimized in any
implicit way, it is all explicit. The problem seems
Andreas Peters suggested another approach, which makes sense to me : have one
plugin with SSE optimizations enabled, another without them and chose at
runtime between the two.
What do you think ?
On 23/03/2014 20:50, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Laurent,
In the context of optimizing erasure
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
Andreas Peters suggested another approach, which makes sense to me : have
one plugin with SSE optimizations enabled, another without them and chose at
runtime between the two.
What do
On 23/03/2014 23:34, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-23 at 20:50 +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Laurent,
In the context of optimizing erasure code functions implemented by
Kevin Greenan (cc'ed) and James Plank at
https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/ we ran accross a question
of this
mail.
Commits by authors
1 255 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
2 187 Samuel Just sam.j...@inktank.com
3 104 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
4 69 Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
5 57 Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de
6 47 Yan
Hi Laurent,
In the context of optimizing erasure code functions implemented by Kevin
Greenan (cc'ed) and James Plank at https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/
we ran accross a question you may have the answer to: can gcc -msse2 (or -msse*
for that matter ) have a negative impact on the
Hi David,
On 20/03/2014 03:40, David Zafman wrote:
My understanding is that are going to be using rados_mon_command() to create
pools according to Tracker #7586: deprecate rados_pool_create. What I found
when building a test case for EC is that after using the mon_command to
create the
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for the update. And congratulations to the lucky developers who get to
work on Ceph full time at Suse ! The positions have been removed from
http://ceph.com/community/careers/
Cheers
On 19/03/2014 14:59, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Loic Dachary wrote:
While at FOSDEM I met
Hi Jim,
As of today jerasure 2 and gf-complete are used in the development version of
ceph :-)
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1384
There are a few pull requests to gf-complete here:
https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/pull-requests
Should they be changed so they can be
Hi Ceph,
Builds happening after
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/7bc9ade26b5af068318e50cb4d5f7824375dd28f
which was merged yesterday and before the following is merged
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1489
will produce binaries using SSE extensions on intel processors without
:13 PM, Loic Dachary
loic.dach...@cloudwatt.com wrote:
Hi Sage Sam,
I quickly sketched the replacement of the pg_pool_t::properties map with a
OSDMap::properties list of maps at
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/commit/fe3819a62eb139fc3f0fa4282b4d22aecd8cd398
and explained how I see
or Sam during todays'
standup to have their opinion about http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7662#note-2
. If that approach sound sensible to them I'll provide an implementation for
review in the next few days.
Cheers
Cheers,
John
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Loic Dachary l
Hi
On 12/03/2014 18:40, Lluís Pàmies i Juárez wrote:
Hi ceph-devel,
I have been playing with the new erasure code functionality and I have
noticed that the erasure coded PG remains in peering state forever. Is
that normal?
I have a scenario with four servers each with two OSDs (total of
,
Lluis
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi
On 12/03/2014 18:40, Lluís Pàmies i Juárez wrote:
Hi ceph-devel,
I have been playing with the new erasure code functionality and I have
noticed that the erasure coded PG remains in peering state forever
, manually adding the ruleset is also possible.
I feel confortable explaining this but I'm probably much too familiar with the
subject to be a good judge of what makes sense to someone new or not ;-)
Cheers
John
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Loic Dachary
loic.dach...@cloudwatt.com wrote:
Hi
Hi Florian,
New efforts should be directed to
https://github.com/stackforge/puppet-ceph (mirrored at
https://github.com/ceph/puppet-ceph) and evolving at
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/puppet-ceph,n,z
I'm happily developing it with Andrew Woodward and David
Hi Sage Sam,
I quickly sketched the replacement of the pg_pool_t::properties map with a
OSDMap::properties list of maps at
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/commit/fe3819a62eb139fc3f0fa4282b4d22aecd8cd398
and explained how I see it at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7662#note-2
It indeed makes
You'll be missed :-)
Patrick, if that's ok with you, we (Guilhem and myself) would like to discuss
what is needed from Ceph from the point of view of configuration management
tools, primarily Chef and Puppet.
Title : Configuration management and Ceph ( Chef, Puppet, ... )
Cheers
On
14:11, Loic Dachary wrote:
You'll be missed :-)
Patrick, if that's ok with you, we (Guilhem and myself) would like to discuss
what is needed from Ceph from the point of view of configuration management
tools, primarily Chef and Puppet.
Title : Configuration management and Ceph ( Chef
On 03/03/2014 15:47, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 03/03/2014 02:20 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi John,
I'd like to draft a user guide for erasure coded pools, oriented toward
system administrators. Where do you advise me to insert this ? Should I get
inspiration from an example
, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 03/03/2014 15:47, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 03/03/2014 02:20 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi John,
I'd like to draft a user guide for erasure coded pools,
oriented toward system administrators. Where do you
) with the rst docs for man page style
information.
Neil
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 03/03/2014 15:47, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 03/03/2014 02:20 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi John
Hi Ceph,
The code implementing Erasure Code in Ceph has been merged in Firefly[1] and is
being tested. The unit tests are run at compile time with make check. The
integration tests are run by teuthology [2], the QA tool dedicated to Ceph. A
few workloads have been added for erasure code [3]
On 25/02/2014 04:34, Ricardo Rocha wrote:
I did it mostly to learn about docker (and because i wanted a 'cluster
in the office' like Loic had :-)). Not incredibly pretty though.
:-) Robert and Stephan created this nice office cluster and it would be nice to
know how it evolved. My
On 24/02/2014 21:59, Jean-Charles LOPEZ wrote:
Hi Sage,
I think this is a great idea.
However, I would recommend that two options to be available:
1) First options is a standalone package as you describe it
2) Second option is a prepackaged VM in OVA format people can just download
of this
mail.
Commits by authors
1 75 Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com
2 70 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
3 66 Samuel Just sam.j...@inktank.com
4 42 Greg Farnum g...@inktank.com
5 36 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
6 24 John Wilkins john.wilk
Ping ?
On 13/02/2014 01:22, Loic Dachary wrote:
Cool :-) brag.ceph.com stands ready to host the server part. Could you send
me your ssh public key to be granted access ?
On 12/02/2014 21:58, Sebastien Han wrote:
Hi guys,
First implementation of the ceph-brag is ready.
We have a public
Hi,
I've added the INCREASE CODE COVERAGE project description and volunteer to be
a mentor.
ALLOW A TUNABLE “PRIMARY AFFINITY” IN THE OSDMAP is already implemented but
not merged yet at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1176
I volunteer to be a co-mentor for ADD ERASURE CODING TO THE
of this
mail.
Commits by authors
1 99 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
2 82 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
3 12 David Zafman david.zaf...@inktank.com
4 10 Noah Watkins noah.watk...@inktank.com
57 Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
67 John
Hi Andreas,
For w=(multiple of 8) we could probably skip the (*sizeof(int)) and get the
chunksize factor 4 down ... Loic we should check if this is ok with the
Jerasure implementation I wonder if we should have 'packetsize' as a
plugin parameter or we should just adjust the packetsize
' as a
plugin parameter or we should just adjust the packetsize based on the desired
chunk_size to get it close.
Cheers Andreas.
From: Samuel Just [sam.j...@inktank.com]
Sent: 02 February 2014 23:45
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
Cc: Loic Dachary; Ceph
check once more the Jerasure alignment requirements and our
current implementation.
To get rid of the platform dependency we could put a generic alignment
requirement that chunksize has to be also 64-byte aligned.
Cheers Andreas.
From: Loic
Hi Ceph,
While at FOSDEM I met with Thorsten who mentioned two job openings dedicated to
Ceph at Suse.
https://attachmatehr.silkroad.com/epostings/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.jobinfojobid=306062company_id=15495version=6source=ONLINEjobOwner=1013810aid=1
Hi Sage,
I'm both happy and stressed out to have more time to work on erasure code :-)
If I'm not mistaken, the Firefly freeze is now set to Friday 14th, 2014. During
this time I plan to focus on implementing whatever is required for Erasure Code
to work with the default jerasure plugin ( I'm
[cc' ceph-devel]
Hi Sam,
Assuming https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1144 gets merged, MONs can query the
plugin for a given pool or crush ruleset conveniently:
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/blob/15c90fbf61445063967fc80ee1c916d70c593a54/src/mon/OSDMonitor.cc#L2803
[cc' ceph-devel]
Hi Sam,
Here is how chunks are expected to be aligned:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/4c4e1d0d470beba7690d1c0e39bfd1146a25f465/src/osd/ErasureCodePluginJerasure/ErasureCodeJerasure.cc#L365
unsigned alignment = k*w*packetsize*sizeof(int);
if (
Hi,
Your last comment made me realize I took an approach that is more complex than
needed (the decode_chunks / encode_chunks methods are not necessary), which
results in something that is also sub-optimal (it decodes too much and has no
way to limit decoding to what is strictly necessary
to be simpler to use than
ceph-deploy and address more use cases, but it is not ready yet.
Cheers
On 24/01/2014 18:38, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
2014/1/24 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org:
Hi,
At the moment the module can only be used to deploy mons. It's making slow
progress but a number of patches
Hi,
I'm told today that the Ceph proxmox integration has recently been improved.
I'm curious to take a look, would you be so kind as to point me to the URL
where I could read about it ?
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I found
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=blob;f=PVE/CephTools.pm;h=f7f11ce2dc515cfd4fb423dbcf6dbbe4877b8afa;hb=3f5368bb67146d89f7ed098dc0c036c2217ed193
but not I'm not familiar with proxmox :-)
On 24/01/2014 09:33, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
I'm told today that the Ceph proxmox
Hi,
At the moment the module can only be used to deploy mons. It's making slow
progress but a number of patches went in Ceph and should significantly simplify
writing the puppet module, starting in Firefly.
Cheers
On 24/01/2014 14:57, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
2013/12/14 Loic Dachary l
Hi Andreas,
I spent some time this week trying to figure out something that would be
reasonably generic, readable from the sysadmin point of view and simple to
implement. The input of the plugin is here:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7146#note-1
The json structure describes the pyramid and
17, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I spent some time this week trying to figure out something that would be
reasonably generic, readable from the sysadmin point of view and simple to
implement. The input of the plugin
,
k: 4,
m: 1,
item: datacenter,
mapping: --^--^--^,
},
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 17 January 2014 12:00
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
Cc: Ceph Development
Subject: Re: Pyramid Erasure Code
that look ?
Cheers Andreas.
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 17 January 2014 14:56
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
Cc: Ceph Development
Subject: Re: Pyramid Erasure Code plugin (draft)
On 17/01/2014 12:18, Andreas Joachim Peters wrote:
Is k
:12, Loic Dachary wrote:
[Amended after comments from Noah Watkins, Patrick McGarry, Andrew Woodward,
Ian Colle, Robin H. Johnson]
Hi Ceph,
Here is a sorted list of authors and organizations who contributed to v0.75,
by number of commits or reviews back to v0.74. The affiliation
Hi Patrick,
I would be happy to present the Ceph User Committee first the first time :-)
Cheers
On 16/01/2014 18:30, Patrick McGarry wrote:
Greetings denizens of the Ceph universe!
As you may have noticed, Inktank has announced the next Ceph Day
which will be held in Frankfurt, Germany on
about how it is done, the details are at the end of this
mail.
Commits by authors
1 104 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
2 86 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
3 18 Noah Watkins noah.watk...@inktank.com
4 12 David Zafman david.zaf...@inktank.com
58
reviewing.
Cheers
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
Here is a sorted list of authors and organizations who contributed to
v0.75, by number of commits or reviews back to v0.74. The affiliation of
authors
Thanks for pointing this problem : using --after --before makes things
complicated and wrong. I'll send a version two momentarily.
On 15/01/2014 21:19, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:21:34AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
Here is a sorted list of authors
been reviewed.
If you are curious about how it is done, the details are at the end of this
mail.
Commits by authors
1 259 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
2 80 Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
3 39 Greg Farnum g...@inktank.com
4 38 Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
preventing the use of indep for replicated
pools.
Cheers
Sincerely, Yuan
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 12/01/2014 15:55, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
From the docs:
step [choose|chooseleaf
On 14/01/2014 16:39, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Andreas Joachim Peters wrote:
After some exchange with Loic and the recent list discussion,
the API of the EC plugin might need some clarification/extension in the
::encode method:
Currently ::encode returns a map
Crystal clear, thanks !
On 13/01/2014 18:25, Kyle Bader wrote:
Hi Loic,
IIRC you figured out how to use
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-tools/tree/master/models . Do you happen to
have some kind of HOWTO or even the list of commands you've used to get me
started ?
git clone
On 13/01/2014 03:35, Kyle Bader wrote:
How is it different from what is described above? There must be something I
fail to understand.
No misunderstanding on your part, on second look that does achieve the
desired placement. Could you please help walk me through the following
scenarios:
Hi Kyle,
IIRC you figured out how to use
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-tools/tree/master/models . Do you happen to have
some kind of HOWTO or even the list of commands you've used to get me started ?
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 12/01/2014 15:31, Kyle Bader wrote:
If we had RS(6:3:3) 6 data chunks, 3 coding chunks, 3 local chunks, the
following rule could be used to spread it over 3 datacenters:
rule erasure_ruleset {
ruleset 1
type erasure
min_size 3
max_size 20
step
On 11/01/2014 00:40, Kyle Bader wrote:
I've been researching what features might be necessary in Ceph to
build multi-site RADOS clusters, whether for purposes of scale or to
meet SLA requirements more stringent than is achievable with a single
datacenter. According to [1], typical
Hi,
The wip-use-pytest branch fails with:
http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-precise-amd64-basic/log.cgi?log=687ec237ea06e36fb44bf23e3850a5b6bdca721b
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: python-pytest
warning: dpkg-buildpackage: Build dependencies/conflicts
Hi,
http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-tarball-saucy-amd64-basic/log.cgi?log=58d68995c4b09c0ec10cd80cd2e16bdb4fdfffc8
Shows a failure. However the output of make check is hidden in the log files.
Would it be possible to display the content of the log files if an error
happens ?
Hi,
A new Erasure Code library has been released as Free Software
https://01.org/storage-acceleration-library/downloads/2013/isa-l-open-source-release
It is quite tempting to write a Ceph erasure code plugin for it and see how it
performs :-)
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
801 - 900 of 1157 matches
Mail list logo
