Thanks Anthony for your knowledge.
I am very happy
Vào Th 7, 13 thg 1, 2024 vào lúc 23:36 Anthony D'Atri <
anthony.da...@gmail.com> đã viết:
> There are nuances, but in general the higher the sum of m+k, the lower the
> performance, because *every* operation has to hit that many drives, which
such operations.
>
> Best regards,
> =
> Frank Schilder
> AIT Risø Campus
> Bygning 109, rum S14
>
> ____
> From: Anthony D'Atri
> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2024 5:36 PM
> To: Phong Tran Thanh
> Cc: ce
: [ceph-users] Re: Recomand number of k and m erasure code
There are nuances, but in general the higher the sum of m+k, the lower the
performance, because *every* operation has to hit that many drives, which is
especially impactful with HDDs. So there’s a tradeoff between storage
efficiency
There are nuances, but in general the higher the sum of m+k, the lower the
performance, because *every* operation has to hit that many drives, which is
especially impactful with HDDs. So there’s a tradeoff between storage
efficiency and performance. And as you’ve seen, larger parity groups
