Re: [ceph-users] Is lttng enable by default in debian hammer-0.94.5?

2015-10-30 Thread shylesh kumar
Hi, Have you disabled apparmor? Please check apparmor_status if libvirtd is in enforcing mode then lttng traces will not be generated. Thanks, Shylesh On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, hzwulibin wrote: > Hi, everyone > > After install hammer-0.94.5 in debian, i want to

[ceph-users] No Presto metadata available for Ceph-noarch ceph-release-1-1.el7.noarch.rp FAILED

2015-10-30 Thread Andrey Shevel
Somebody knows what does mean the error message ??? === [ceph@ceph-admin yum.repos.d]$ sudo yum update -y && sudo yum install ceph-deploy -y Loaded plugins: priorities Ceph | 951 B 00:00:00 Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:

Re: [ceph-users] Cloudstack agent crashed JVM with exception in librbd

2015-10-30 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 29-10-15 16:38, Voloshanenko Igor wrote: > Hi Wido and all community. > > We catched very idiotic issue on our Cloudstack installation, which > related to ceph and possible to java-rados lib. > I think you ran into this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8879 Cleaning

Re: [ceph-users] Cloudstack agent crashed JVM with exception in librbd

2015-10-30 Thread Voloshanenko Igor
It's pain, but not... :( We already used your updated lib in dev env... :( 2015-10-30 10:06 GMT+02:00 Wido den Hollander : > > > On 29-10-15 16:38, Voloshanenko Igor wrote: > > Hi Wido and all community. > > > > We catched very idiotic issue on our Cloudstack installation, which >

Re: [ceph-users] Is lttng enable by default in debian hammer-0.94.5?

2015-10-30 Thread hzwulibin
Hi, we don't enable the appormor. Thanks! -- hzwulibin 2015-10-30 - 发件人:shylesh kumar 发送日期:2015-10-30 20:44 收件人:hzwulibin 抄送:ceph-devel,ceph-users 主题:Re:

Re: [ceph-users] Is lttng enable by default in debian hammer-0.94.5?

2015-10-30 Thread shylesh kumar
Hi, Have you disabled apparmor? Please check apparmor_status if libvirtd is in enforcing mode then lttng traces will not be generated. Thanks, Shylesh On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, hzwulibin wrote: > Hi, everyone > > After install hammer-0.94.5 in debian, i want to

[ceph-users] Write throughput drops to zero

2015-10-30 Thread Brendan Moloney
Hi, I recently got my first Ceph cluster up and running and have been doing some stress tests. I quickly found that during sequential write benchmarks the throughput would often drop to zero. Initially I saw this inside QEMU virtual machines, but I can also reproduce the issue with "rados

[ceph-users] ceph -s hangs; need troubleshooting ideas

2015-10-30 Thread Artie Ziff
Hello, I have one ceph cluster that works fine and one that is not starting. On VM cluster Ceph works OK. On my native hardware Ceph is not starting. OS is same: an recently updated Ubuntu 14 Following the *exact* same procedure as the cluster that is working, as the

Re: [ceph-users] SHA1 wrt hammer release and tag v0.94.3

2015-10-30 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Artie Ziff wrote: > Hello, > > In the RELEASE INFORMATION section of the hammer v0.94.3 issue tracker [1] > the git commit SHA1 is: b2503b0e15c0b13f480f0835060479717b9cf935 > > On the github page for Ceph Release v0.94.3 [2], when I click on

Re: [ceph-users] Write throughput drops to zero

2015-10-30 Thread K K
I was get same situation at 1gbit network. Try to change mtu 9000 on nic and switch. Do you show cluster configs? -- Kostya суббота, 31 октября 2015г., 02:30 +05:00 от Brendan Moloney < molo...@ohsu.edu> : >Hi, > >I recently got my first Ceph cluster up and running and have been doing some

[ceph-users] SHA1 wrt hammer release and tag v0.94.3

2015-10-30 Thread Artie Ziff
Hello, In the RELEASE INFORMATION section of the hammer v0.94.3 issue tracker [1] the git commit SHA1 is: b2503b0e15c0b13f480f0835060479717b9cf935 On the github page for Ceph Release v0.94.3 [2], when I click on the "95cefea" link [3] we see the commit SHA1 of:

Re: [ceph-users] proxmox 4.0 release : lxc with krbd support and qemu librbd improvements

2015-10-30 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Florent B wrote: > Hi, > > Just a little question for krbd gurus : Proxmox 4 uses 4.2.2 kernel, is > krbd stable for Hammer ? And will it be for Infernalis ? krbd is in upstream kernel - speaking in terms of ceph releases has little point.

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-disk prepare with systemd and infernarlis

2015-10-30 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Mathias, On 31/10/2015 02:05, MATHIAS, Bryn (Bryn) wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been rolling out an infernarlis cluster, however I get stuck on the > ceph-disk prepare stage. > > I am deploying ceph via ansible along with a whole load of other software. > > Log output at the end of the

[ceph-users] ceph-disk prepare with systemd and infernarlis

2015-10-30 Thread MATHIAS, Bryn (Bryn)
Hi All, I have been rolling out an infernarlis cluster, however I get stuck on the ceph-disk prepare stage. I am deploying ceph via ansible along with a whole load of other software. Log output at the end of the message but the solution is to copy the "/lib/systemd/system/ceph-osd@.service”