On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 18:31, Vasu Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Is there a way we can easily set that up without trying to use outdated
>> tools? Presumably if ceph still supports this as the docs claim, there's a
>> way to get it done without using ceph-deploy?
>>
> It might be more involved if you are
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 18:12, Vasu Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> As explained above, we can't just create smaller raw devices. Yes, these
>> are VMs but they're meant to replicate physical servers that will be used
>> in production, where no such volumes are available.
>>
> In that case you will have to
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 18:04, Vasu Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:42 PM Matthew Pounsett
> wrote:
>
>> you are using HOST:DIR option which is bit old and I think it was
>> supported till jewel, since you are using 2.0.1 you should be using only
&
Going to take another stab at this...
We have a development environment–made up of VMs–for developing and testing
the deployment tools for a particular service that depends on cephfs for
sharing state data between hosts. In production we will be using filestore
OSDs because of the very low
I'm in the process of updating some development VMs that use ceph-fs. It
looks like recent updates to ceph have deprecated the 'ceph-deploy osd
prepare' and 'activate' commands in favour of the previously-optional
'create' command.
We're using filestore OSDs on these VMs, but I can't seem to
On 10 August 2018 at 07:09, Janne Johansson wrote:
>
> As opposed to the previous setup, this will add some inter-host traffic
> aswell, each write to the primary PG will then in turn cause that host to
> replicate it
> again over the network to X other hosts to form the required amount of
>
Wow.. thanks for such a detailed reply!
On 10 August 2018 at 07:08, Burkhard Linke <
burkhard.li...@computational.bio.uni-giessen.de> wrote:
> The default ceph setup uses 3 replicates on three different hosts, so you
> need at least three hosts for a ceph cluster. Other configurations with a
>
I'm looking for some high level information about the usefulness of ceph to
a particular use case and, assuming it's considered a good choice, whether
the migration path I have in mind has any particular gotchas that I should
be on the look out for.
The current situation is that I've inherited
