[ceph-users] [Ceph Admin & Monitoring] Inkscope is back

Hi, Inkscope, a ceph admin and monitoring GUI, is still alive. It can be now installed with an ansible playbook. https://github.com/inkscope/inkscope-ansible Best regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ghislain Chevalier ORANGE/IMT/OLS/DIESE/LCP/DDSD Software-Defined Storage Architect

Re: [ceph-users] Federated gateways

Hi, We did a PoC at Orange and encountered some difficulties in configurating federation. Can you check that placements targets are identical on each zone? brgds De : ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] De la part de wd_hw...@wistron.com Envoyé : vendredi 6 novembre 2015

Re: [ceph-users] RGW pool contents

Hi, Did you try to use the cleanup and dispose steps of cosbench? brgds De : ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] De la part de Somnath Roy Envoyé : mardi 24 novembre 2015 20:49 À : ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Objet : [ceph-users] RGW pool contents Hi Yehuda/RGW experts, I have

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph] Not able to use erasure code profile

Hi Quentin Did you check the pool was correctly created (Pg allocation)? Envoyé de mon Galaxy Ace4 Orange Message d'origine De : quentin.d...@orange.com Date :17/12/2015 19:45 (GMT+01:00) À : ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Cc : Objet : [ceph-users] [Ceph] Not able to use erasure

Re: [ceph-users] Placement rule not resolved

Hi Robert, Sorry for replying late We finally use a step take at root on the production platform Even if I tested a rule on the sandbox platform with a step take at a non-root level ... and it works. Brgds -Message d'origine- De : Robert LeBlanc [mailto:rob...@leblancnet.us] Envoyé 

Re: [ceph-users] Placement rule not resolved

Hi all, After installing the cluster, all the disks (sas and ssd) were mixed under a host, so the calculated reweight was related to the entire capacity. It doesn't explain why sas disks were selected when using a specific ssd-driven rule. Brgds De : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS Envoyé :

Re: [ceph-users] Placement rule not resolved

HI all, I didn't notice that osd reweight for ssd was curiously set to a low value. I don't know how and when these values were set so low. Our environment is Mirantis-driven and the installation was powered by fuel and puppet. (the installation was run by the openstack team and I checked the

[ceph-users] Placement rule not resolved

Hi, Context: Firefly 0.80.9 8 storage nodes 176 osds : 14*8 sas and 8*8 ssd 3 monitors I create an alternate crushmap in order to fulfill tiering requirement i.e. select ssd or sas. I created specific buckets "host-ssd" and "host-sas" and regroup them in "tier-ssd" and "tier-sas" under a

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Thx Mark I understand the specific parameters are mandatory for the S3 implementation but as they are not for the swift implementation (I tested it...) it should have been better to distinguish which parameter is mandatory according to the implementation. For the S3 implementation, the creation

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

HI all, After adding the nss and the keystone admin url parameters in ceph.conf and creating the openSSL certificates, all is working well. If I had followed the doc and processed by copy/paste, I wouldn't have encountered any problems. As all is working well without this set of parameters

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Hi, Coming back to that issue. My endpoint wasn’t right set up. I changed it to myrgw:myport (rgwow:8080) in the cloudberry profile or in the curl request and I got a 403 error due to a potential bad role returned by keystone. In the radosgw log, I got 2015-05-05 14:58:23.895961 7fb9f4fe9700

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Addendum In the keystone log, I got 2015-05-06 11:42:24.594 10435 INFO eventlet.wsgi.server [-] 10.193.108.238 - - [06/May/2015 11:42:24] POST /v2.0/s3tokens HTTP/1.1 404 247 0.003872 Something is missing This is my new quest… De : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS Envoyé : mercredi 6 mai 2015

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Hi again, I found that a keystone extension is required to interact between s3 and keystone and it’s possible to get the list of the installed extensions. When I request post http://10.194.167.23:5000/v2.0/extension, I got in the response body ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? extensions

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Hi, I finally configure a cloudberry profile by setting what seems to be the right endpoint for object storage according to the openstack environment : myrgw:myport/swift/v1 I got a “204 no content” error even if 2 containers were previously created by a swift operation with object into them.

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Hi, Despite the creation of ec2 credentials which provides an accesskey and a secretkey for a user, it’s always impossible to connect using S3 (Forbidden/Access denied). All is right using swift (create container, list container, get object, put object, delete object) I use cloudberry client

Re: [ceph-users] how to compute Ceph durability?

Thanks Mark Loic also gave me this link It would be a good start for sure Best regards -Message d'origine- De : ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] De la part de Mark Nelson Envoyé : mardi 14 avril 2015 14:11 À : ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Objet : Re: [ceph-users] how

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Thanks a lot That helps. De : Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com] Envoyé : lundi 13 avril 2015 18:32 À : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS Cc : ceph-users Objet : Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone I haven't really used the S3 stuff much, but the credentials should be in

Re: [ceph-users] how to compute Ceph durability?

Hi All, Am I alone to have this need ? De : ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] De la part de ghislain.cheval...@orange.com Envoyé : vendredi 20 mars 2015 11:47 À : ceph-users Objet : [ceph-users] how to compute Ceph durability? Hi all, I would like to compute the durability

Re: [ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Hi all, Coming back to that issue. I successfully used keystone users for the rados gateway and the swift API but I still don't understand how it can work with S3 API and i.e. S3 users (AccessKey/SecretKey) I found a swift3 initiative but I think It's only compliant in a pure OpenStack swift

Re: [ceph-users] [radosgw] ceph daemon usage

HI all, Works with ceph -admin-daemon /var/run/ceph/ceph-client.radosgw.fr-rennes-radosgw1.asok config set debug_rgw 20 De : ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] De la part de ghislain.cheval...@orange.com Envoyé : mercredi 25 février 2015 15:06 À : Ceph Users Objet :

[ceph-users] Rados Gateway and keystone

Hi All, I just would to be sure about keystone configuration for Rados Gateway. I read the documentation http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/keystone/ and http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/config-ref/?highlight=keystone but I didn't catch if after having configured the rados gateway

[ceph-users] how to compute Ceph durability?

Hi all, I would like to compute the durability of data stored in a ceph environment according to the cluster topology (failure domains) and the data resiliency (replication/erasure coding). Does a tool exist ? Best regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ghislain Chevalier ORANGE

Re: [ceph-users] Shadow files

Hi I just want to tell you there is a rgw object visualisation that could help you in our tool called inkscope available on github Best regards Envoyé de mon Galaxy Ace4 Orange Message d'origine De : Italo Santos okd...@gmail.com Date :12/03/2015 21:26 (GMT+01:00) À : Ben

[ceph-users] Tr : RadosGW - Bucket link and ACLs

Message d'origine De : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS ghislain.cheval...@orange.com Date :06/03/2015 21:56 (GMT+01:00) À : Italo Santos okd...@gmail.com Cc : Objet : RE : [ceph-users] RadosGW - Bucket link and ACLs Hi We encountered this behavior when developing the rgw admin

Re: [ceph-users] question about rgw create bucket

HI all, I think this question can maybe be linked to the mail I sent (fev 25) related to unconsistency between bucket and bucket.instance. Best regards De : ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] De la part de baijia...@126.com Envoyé : lundi 2 mars 2015 08:00 À : ceph-users;

[ceph-users] [radosgw] unconsistency between bucket and bucket.instance metadata

Hi all, Context : Firefly 0.80.8, Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, Lab cluster Yesterday, I successfully deleted a s3 bucket Bucket001ghis after removing the contents that were in. Today, as I was browsing the radosgw system metadata, I discovered an difference between the bucket metadata and the

[ceph-users] [radosgw] ceph daemon usage

Hi all Context : Firefly 0.80.8, Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I tried to change live the debug level of a rados gateway using ceph daemon /var/run/ceph/ceph-client.radosgw.fr-rennes-radosgw1.asok config set debug_rgw 20 the response is { success: } but it has no effect. Is there another parameter

Re: [ceph-users] radosgw-agent failed to parse

HI all, Context : Ubuntu 14.04 TLS firefly 0.80.7 I recently encountered the same issue as described below. Maybe I missed something between July and January… I found that the http request wasn't correctly built by /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/radosgw_agent/client.py I did the changes

[ceph-users] [rgw] chunk size

Hi all Context : firefly 0.80.7 OS : ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS I'd like to change the chunk size for object stored with rgw to 1MB (4MB is the default) I changed ceph.conf setting rgw object stripe size = 1048576 and restarted the rgw. The chunk size remains to 4MB. I saw in different exchanges

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph-rgw] pool assignment

Before configuring region and zone, I would like to known which tags can be updated in metadata bucket.instance? Are there restrictions according to the capabilities applied to radosgw-admin? -Message d'origine- De : ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph-rgw] pool assignment

Thanks Sorry for answering late I'm going to implement region, zone and placement targets in order to reach my goals. Best regards -Message d'origine- De : Yehuda Sadeh [mailto:yeh...@inktank.com] Envoyé : vendredi 11 avril 2014 18:34 À : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS Cc :

[ceph-users] [Ceph-rgw] pool assigment

Hi all, Context : CEPH dumpling on Ubuntu 12.04 I would like to manage as accurately as possible the pools assigned to Rados gateway My goal is to apply specific SLA to applications which use http-driven storage. I 'd like to store the contents by associating a pool to a bucket, or a pool to a

[ceph-users] Failure in OSD creation process using ceph-deploy

Hi all, I'd like to submit a strange behavior... Context : lab platform CEPH emperor Ceph-deploy 1.3.4 Ubuntu 12.04 Issue: We have 3 OSD up and running; we encountered no difficulties in creating them. We tried to create an osd.3 using ceph-deploy on a storage node (r-cephosd301) from an admin