On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:51 PM, René Gallati wrote:
> Hello Antonio,
> I use aptly to manage my repositories and mix and match (and snapshot / pin)
I didn't know aptly, thank you for mentioning.
> specific versions and non-standard packages, but as far as I know, the
> kernel from utopic unicorn
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:51 PM, René Gallati wrote:
> Hello Antonio,
> I use aptly to manage my repositories and mix and match (and snapshot / pin)
I didn't know aptly, thank you for mentioning.
> specific versions and non-standard packages, but as far as I know, the
> kernel from utopic unicorn
release, which should
be released early next year.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
Antonio Messina
Sent: 05 December 2014 15:38
To: Nick Fisk
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com; Antonio Messina
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Giant or F
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > The v2 rule means you have a crush rule for erasure coding. Do you have
> > an EC pool in your cluster?
>
> Yes indeed. I didn't know EC pool was incompatible with the current
> kernel, I only teste
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> The v2 rule means you have a crush rule for erasure coding. Do you have
> an EC pool in your cluster?
Yes indeed. I didn't know EC pool was incompatible with the current
kernel, I only tested it with rados bench and VMs, I guess.
> The tunables
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Cephers,
> >> >
> >> > Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production inst
Hi all, just an update
After setting "chooseleaf_vary_r" to 0 _and_ removing an pool with
erasure coding, I was able to run rbd map.
Thank you all for the help
.a.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Antonio Messina
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014,
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba wrote:
>> > Hi Cephers,
>> >
>> > Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
>>
>> This is very interesting to me too: we
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba wrote:
> > Hi Cephers,
> >
> > Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
>
> This is very interesting to me too: we are going to deploy a large
> ceph cluster on Ubuntu 14.0
Behalf Of
> Antonio Messina
> Sent: 05 December 2014 15:38
> To: Nick Fisk
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com; Antonio Messina
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Giant or Firefly for production
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Nick Fisk wrote:
>> This is probably due to the K
should
be released early next year.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
Antonio Messina
Sent: 05 December 2014 15:38
To: Nick Fisk
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com; Antonio Messina
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Giant or Firefly for
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
I'm running 3.17 on my trusty clients without issue
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Antonio Messina wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Nick Fisk wrote:
> > This is probably due to the Kernel RBD client not being recent enough.
> Have
> > you
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Nick Fisk wrote:
> This is probably due to the Kernel RBD client not being recent enough. Have
> you tried upgrading your kernel to a newer version? 3.16 should contain all
> the relevant features required by Giant.
I would rather tune the tunables, as upgrading th
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, David Moreau Simard wrote:
> What are the kernel versions involved ?
>
> We have Ubuntu precise clients talking to a Ubuntu trusty cluster without
> issues - with tunables optimal.
> 0.88 (Giant) and 0.89 has been working well for us as far the client and
> Openst
Antonio Messina
Sent: 05 December 2014 09:37
To: Anthony Alba
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Giant or Firefly for production
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba
wrote:
> Hi Cephers,
>
> Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead o
What are the kernel versions involved ?
We have Ubuntu precise clients talking to a Ubuntu trusty cluster without
issues - with tunables optimal.
0.88 (Giant) and 0.89 has been working well for us as far the client and
Openstack are concerned.
This link provides some insight as to the possible
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba wrote:
> Hi Cephers,
>
> Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
This is very interesting to me too: we are going to deploy a large
ceph cluster on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and so far what I have found is that
the rbd modul
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba wrote:
> Hi Cephers,
>
> Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
This is very interesting to me too: we are going to deploy a large
ceph cluster on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and so far what I have found is that
the rbd mod
Hi Cephers,
Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
Any gotchas?
Regards
Anthony
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
