On Apr 29, 2016 11:46 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 29, 2016, Edward Huyer >
wrote:
This is more of a "why" than a "can I/should I" question.
The Ceph block device
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Oliver Dzombic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sure.
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13643
Thanks!!
I've totally missed that -;
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
>
> Oliver Dzombic
> IP-Interactive
>
> mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de
>
Hi,
sure.
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13643
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
Oliver Dzombic
IP-Interactive
mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de
Anschrift:
IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt )
Zum Sonnenberg 1-3
63571 Gelnhausen
HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Oliver Dzombic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a memory allocation bug, at least in hammer.
>
Could you give us any pointer?
> Mouting an rbd volume as a block device on a ceph node might run you
> into that. Then your mount wont work, and you
Hi,
there is a memory allocation bug, at least in hammer.
Mouting an rbd volume as a block device on a ceph node might run you
into that. Then your mount wont work, and you will have to restart the
OSD daemon(s).
Its generally not a perfectly good idea.
Better use a dedicated client for the
On Friday, April 29, 2016, Edward Huyer wrote:
> This is more of a "why" than a "can I/should I" question.
>
> The Ceph block device quickstart says (if I interpret it correctly) not to
> use a physical machine as both a Ceph RBD client and a node for hosting
> OSDs or other Ceph
, 2016 11:30 AM
Subject: [ceph-users] Mapping RBD On Ceph Cluster Node
To: <ceph-us...@ceph.com>
This is more of a "why" than a "can I/should I" question.
The Ceph block device quickstart says (if I interpret it correctly) not to use
a physical machine as both a Ceph R
This is more of a "why" than a "can I/should I" question.
The Ceph block device quickstart says (if I interpret it correctly) not to use
a physical machine as both a Ceph RBD client and a node for hosting OSDs or
other Ceph services.
Is this interpretation correct? If so, what is the