Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-06-14 Thread Scheurer François
Dear Casey Thank you for the update and bug report. Best Regards Francois Scheurer From: Casey Bodley Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 4:53 PM To: Scheurer François; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: Re: is rgw crypt default encryption key long term

Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-06-11 Thread Casey Bodley
The server side encryption features all require special x-amz headers on write, so they only apply to our S3 apis. But objects encrypted with SSE-KMS (or a default encryption key) can be read without any x-amz headers, so swift should be able to decrypt them too. I agree that this is a bug and

Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-06-07 Thread Scheurer François
Hello Casey We found something weird during our testing of the rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key=""xxx" parameter. s3cms behaves like expected: s3cmd is then always writing encrypted objects s3cmd can read encrypted and unencrypted objects but swift does not support encryption: swift can read

Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-06-06 Thread Florian Engelmann
Am 5/28/19 um 5:37 PM schrieb Casey Bodley: On 5/28/19 11:17 AM, Scheurer François wrote: Hi Casey I greatly appreciate your quick and helpful answer :-) It's unlikely that we'll do that, but if we do it would be announced with a long deprecation period and migration strategy. Fine, just

Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-05-29 Thread Scheurer François
Hello Casey Thank you for your reply. To close this subject, one last question. Do you know if it is possible to rotate the key defined by "rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key=" ? Best Regards Francois Scheurer From: Casey Bodley Sent: Tuesday, May

Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-05-28 Thread Casey Bodley
On 5/28/19 11:17 AM, Scheurer François wrote: Hi Casey I greatly appreciate your quick and helpful answer :-) It's unlikely that we'll do that, but if we do it would be announced with a long deprecation period and migration strategy. Fine, just the answer we wanted to hear ;-)

Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-05-28 Thread Scheurer François
Hi Casey I greatly appreciate your quick and helpful answer :-) >It's unlikely that we'll do that, but if we do it would be announced with a >long deprecation period and migration strategy. Fine, just the answer we wanted to hear ;-) >However, I would still caution against using either as

Re: [ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-05-28 Thread Casey Bodley
Hi François, Removing support for either of rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key or rgw_crypt_s3_kms_encryption_keys would mean that objects encrypted with those keys would no longer be accessible. It's unlikely that we'll do that, but if we do it would be announced with a long deprecation

[ceph-users] is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supported ?

2019-05-28 Thread Scheurer François
Dear Casey, Dear Ceph Users The following is written in the radosgw documentation (http://docs.ceph.com/docs/luminous/radosgw/encryption/): rgw crypt default encryption key = 4YSmvJtBv0aZ7geVgAsdpRnLBEwWSWlMIGnRS8a9TSA= Important: This mode is for diagnostic purposes only! The ceph