Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-11-07 Thread Erik McCormick
On Nov 8, 2017 7:33 AM, "Vasu Kulkarni" wrote: On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Alfredo Deza wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:09 AM, kefu chai wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Sage

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-11-07 Thread Vasu Kulkarni
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Alfredo Deza wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:09 AM, kefu chai wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> >> At CDM yesterday we talked about

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-11-07 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Alfredo Deza wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:09 AM, kefu chai wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > >> At CDM yesterday we talked about removing the ability to name your ceph > >> clusters. There are a number of

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-11-07 Thread kefu chai
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > At CDM yesterday we talked about removing the ability to name your ceph > clusters. There are a number of hurtles that make it difficult to fully > get rid of this functionality, not the least of which is that some > (many?)

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-11-06 Thread Erik McCormick
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, Erik McCormick wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Sage Weil wrote: >> >> Questions: >> >> >> >> - Does anybody on the list use a

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-11 Thread Peter Maloney
On 06/08/17 21:37, Sage Weil wrote: > Questions: > > - Does anybody on the list use a non-default cluster name? > - If so, do you have a reason not to switch back to 'ceph'? > > Thanks! > sage Will it still be possible for clients to use multiple clusters? Also how does this affect rbd

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Sage Weil
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, Dan van der Ster wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Vasu Kulkarni wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Wes Dillingham > > wrote: > >> Similar to Dan's situation we utilize the --cluster name concept for our > >>

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Dan van der Ster
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Vasu Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Wes Dillingham > wrote: >> Similar to Dan's situation we utilize the --cluster name concept for our >> operations. Primarily for "datamover" nodes which do

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Sage Weil
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, Erik McCormick wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Sage Weil wrote: > >> Questions: > >> > >> - Does anybody on the list use a non-default cluster name? > >> - If so, do you have a reason not to switch back to

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Erik McCormick
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Sage Weil wrote: >> Questions: >> >> - Does anybody on the list use a non-default cluster name? >> - If so, do you have a reason not to switch back to 'ceph'? > > It sounds like the answer is "yes," but

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Sage Weil
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Sage Weil wrote: > Questions: > > - Does anybody on the list use a non-default cluster name? > - If so, do you have a reason not to switch back to 'ceph'? It sounds like the answer is "yes," but not for daemons. Several users use it on the client side to connect to

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Vasu Kulkarni
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Wes Dillingham wrote: > Similar to Dan's situation we utilize the --cluster name concept for our > operations. Primarily for "datamover" nodes which do incremental rbd > import/export between distinct clusters. This is entirely

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Wes Dillingham
Similar to Dan's situation we utilize the --cluster name concept for our operations. Primarily for "datamover" nodes which do incremental rbd import/export between distinct clusters. This is entirely coordinated by utilizing the --cluster option throughout. The way we set it up is that all

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Alfredo Deza
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bassam Tabbara wrote: >> Thanks Sage. >> >> > At CDM yesterday we talked about removing the ability to name your ceph >> > clusters. >> >> Just to be clear, it would still be possible to run multiple ceph >>

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-09 Thread Tim Serong
On 06/09/2017 06:41 AM, Benjeman Meekhof wrote: > Hi Sage, > > We did at one time run multiple clusters on our OSD nodes and RGW > nodes (with Jewel). We accomplished this by putting code in our > puppet-ceph module that would create additional systemd units with > appropriate CLUSTER=name

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-08 Thread Vaibhav Bhembre
We have an internal management service that works at a higher layer upstream on top of multiple Ceph clusters. It needs a way to differentiate and connect separately to each of those clusters. Presently making that distinction is relatively easy since we create those connections based on

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-08 Thread mmokhtar
Hi Sage, We do use cluster names, we do not use ceph-deploy or ceph-ansible so in the short term it is not an issue. We have scripts that call cli commands with the --cluster XX parameter, would that still work ? What time frame do you have in mind for removing this ? Cheers /Maged On

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-08 Thread Benjeman Meekhof
Hi Sage, We did at one time run multiple clusters on our OSD nodes and RGW nodes (with Jewel). We accomplished this by putting code in our puppet-ceph module that would create additional systemd units with appropriate CLUSTER=name environment settings for clusters not named ceph. IE, if the

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-08 Thread Dan van der Ster
Hi Sage, We need named clusters on the client side. RBD or CephFS clients, or monitoring/admin machines all need to be able to access several clusters. Internally, each cluster is indeed called "ceph", but the clients use distinct names to differentiate their configs/keyrings. Cheers, Dan On

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-08 Thread Sage Weil
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bassam Tabbara wrote: > Thanks Sage. > > > At CDM yesterday we talked about removing the ability to name your ceph > > clusters. > > Just to be clear, it would still be possible to run multiple ceph > clusters on the same nodes, right? Yes, but you'd need to either (1)

Re: [ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-08 Thread Bassam Tabbara
Thanks Sage. > At CDM yesterday we talked about removing the ability to name your ceph > clusters. Just to be clear, it would still be possible to run multiple ceph clusters on the same nodes, right? ___ ceph-users mailing list

[ceph-users] removing cluster name support

2017-06-08 Thread Sage Weil
At CDM yesterday we talked about removing the ability to name your ceph clusters. There are a number of hurtles that make it difficult to fully get rid of this functionality, not the least of which is that some (many?) deployed clusters make use of it. We decided that the most we can do at