Re: [ceph-users] rgw, nss: dropping the legacy PKI token support in RadosGW (removed in OpenStack Ocata)

2019-04-19 Thread Mike Lowe
I’ve run production Ceph/OpenStack since 2015. The reality is running OpenStack Newton (the last one with pki) with a post Nautilus release just isn’t going to work. You are going to have bigger problems than trying to make object storage work with keystone issued tokens. Worst case is you

Re: [ceph-users] rgw, nss: dropping the legacy PKI token support in RadosGW (removed in OpenStack Ocata)

2019-04-19 Thread Anthony D'Atri
I've been away from OpenStack for a couple of years now, so this may have changed. But back around the Icehouse release, at least, upgrading between OpenStack releases was a major undertaking, so backing an older OpenStack with newer Ceph seems like it might be more common than one might

Re: [ceph-users] rgw, nss: dropping the legacy PKI token support in RadosGW (removed in OpenStack Ocata)

2019-04-19 Thread Sage Weil
[Adding ceph-users for better usability] On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote: > Hello, > > RadosGW can use OpenStack Keystone as one of its authentication > backends. Keystone in turn had been offering many token variants > over the time with PKI/PKIz being one of them. Unfortunately,