Re: [ceph-users] AutoScale PG Questions - EC Pool

2019-09-11 Thread Ashley Merrick
Done : https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/41756 On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:48:42 +0800 Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote On 2019-09-10T13:36:53, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > > So I am correct in 2048 being a very high number and should go for > > either 256 or 512 like

Re: [ceph-users] AutoScale PG Questions - EC Pool

2019-09-11 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2019-09-10T13:36:53, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > > So I am correct in 2048 being a very high number and should go for > > either 256 or 512 like you said for a cluster of my size with the EC > > Pool of 8+2? > Indeed. I suggest stay at 256. Might as well go to 512, but the 2^n is really

Re: [ceph-users] AutoScale PG Questions - EC Pool

2019-09-10 Thread Konstantin Shalygin
On 9/10/19 1:17 PM, Ashley Merrick wrote: So I am correct in 2048 being a very high number and should go for either 256 or 512 like you said for a cluster of my size with the EC Pool of 8+2? Indeed. I suggest stay at 256. k ___ ceph-users

Re: [ceph-users] AutoScale PG Questions - EC Pool

2019-09-10 Thread Ashley Merrick
So I am correct in 2048 being a very high number and should go for either 256 or 512 like you said for a cluster of my size with the EC Pool of 8+2? Thanks On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:12:58 +0800 Konstantin Shalygin wrote You should not use 300PG

Re: [ceph-users] AutoScale PG Questions - EC Pool

2019-09-10 Thread Konstantin Shalygin
I have a EC Pool (8+2) which has 30 OSD (3 Nodes), grown from the orginal 10 OSD (1 Node). I originally set the pool with a PG_NUM of 300, however the AutoScale PG is showing a warn saying I should set this to 2048, I am not sure if this is a good suggestion or if the Autoscale currently is