Is there going to be an announcement for 10.2.9 either? I haven't seen
anything other than users noticing the packages.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017, 10:30 AM Martin Palma wrote:
> Thank you for the clarification and yes we saw that v10.2.9 was just
> released. :-)
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
Thank you for the clarification and yes we saw that v10.2.9 was just
released. :-)
Best,
Martin
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Martin Palma wrote:
>> So only the ceph-mds is affected? Let's say
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Martin Palma wrote:
> So only the ceph-mds is affected? Let's say if we have mons and osds
> on 10.2.8 and the MDS on 10.2.6 or 10.2.7 we would be "safe"?
Yes, only the MDS was affected.
As Udo mentioned, v10.2.9 is out so feel free to upgrade
Hi,
10.2.9 is there:
apt list --upgradable
Listing... Done
ceph/stable 10.2.9-1~bpo80+1 amd64 [upgradable from: 10.2.8-1~bpo80+1]
Change-File??
Udo
Am 2017-07-14 09:26, schrieb Martin Palma:
So only the ceph-mds is affected? Let's say if we have mons and osds
on 10.2.8 and the MDS on 10.2.6
So only the ceph-mds is affected? Let's say if we have mons and osds
on 10.2.8 and the MDS on 10.2.6 or 10.2.7 we would be "safe"?
I'm asking since we need to add new storage nodes to our production cluster.
Best,
Martin
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Patrick Donnelly
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Abhishek L
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Xiaoxi Chen wrote:
>>> +However, it also introduced a regression that
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Abhishek L
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Xiaoxi Chen wrote:
>> +However, it also introduced a regression that could cause MDS damage.
>> +Therefore, we do *not* recommend that Jewel users upgrade
Understood, thanks Abhishek.
So 10.2.9 will not be another release cycle but just 10.2.8+ mds fix,
and expect to be out soon, right?
2017-07-12 23:51 GMT+08:00 Abhishek L :
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Xiaoxi Chen wrote:
>>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Xiaoxi Chen wrote:
> +However, it also introduced a regression that could cause MDS damage.
> +Therefore, we do *not* recommend that Jewel users upgrade to this version -
> +instead, we recommend upgrading directly to v10.2.9 in which the
+However, it also introduced a regression that could cause MDS damage.
+Therefore, we do *not* recommend that Jewel users upgrade to this version -
+instead, we recommend upgrading directly to v10.2.9 in which the regression is
+fixed.
It looks like this version is NOT production ready. Curious
The lack of communication on this makes me tentative to upgrade to it. Are
the packages available to Ubuntu/Debian systems production ready and
intended for upgrades?
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM Brad Hubbard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:58 AM, David Turner
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:58 AM, David Turner wrote:
> I haven't seen any release notes for 10.2.8 yet. Is there a document
> somewhere stating what's in the release?
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16274 for now although it should
make it into the master doc tree
I haven't seen any release notes for 10.2.8 yet. Is there a document
somewhere stating what's in the release?
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:41 AM Henrik Korkuc wrote:
> On 17-07-10 08:29, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > so this morning I was greeted with the
On 17-07-10 08:29, Christian Balzer wrote:
Hello,
so this morning I was greeted with the availability of 10.2.8 for both
Jessie and Stretch (much appreciated), but w/o any announcement here or
updated release notes on the website, etc.
Any reason other "Friday" (US time) for this?
Christian
14 matches
Mail list logo