Re: [ceph-users] About the NFS on RGW

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Xusangdi wrote: > Hi Matt & Cephers, > > I am looking for advise on setting up a file system based on Ceph. As CephFS > is not yet productive ready(or I missed some breakthroughs?), the new NFS on > RadosGW should be a promising alternative,

Re: [ceph-users] About the NFS on RGW

Hi Xusangdi, NFS on RGW is not intended as an alternative to CephFS. The basic idea is to expose the S3 namespace using Amazon's prefix+delimiter convention (delimiter currently limited to '/'). We use opens for atomicity, which implies NFSv4 (or 4.1). In addition to limitations by design,

[ceph-users] About the NFS on RGW

Hi Matt & Cephers, I am looking for advise on setting up a file system based on Ceph. As CephFS is not yet productive ready(or I missed some breakthroughs?), the new NFS on RadosGW should be a promising alternative, especially for large files, which is what we are most interested in. However,