Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM Question #5: Link Layer Adaptation Overheads

2014-01-11 Thread Rich Brown
Folks, Thanks for all the good responses to this question. I have incorporated the info into the SQM page on the wiki, so that it now gives broad recommendations for each link type, and refers people to the (new) “Everything you wanted to know about Link Layer Adaptation” page. This allows

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL

2014-01-11 Thread Rich Brown
The VDSL option is burning up way too many of my brain cells. Given that VDSL may well use ATM, while VDSL2 is unlikely to use ATM, I think that it isn’t useful to include it as a top-level choice . In the new pages, I propose removing the VDSL choice, leaving: - “ATM (any kind of DSL link)”

[Cerowrt-devel] Perfection vs. Good Enough

2014-01-11 Thread Rich Brown
Folks, I am so pleased with the state of CeroWrt. The software has improved enormously, to the point that we all get really good performance from our routers at home. If you want a real eyeful of the progress we’ve made, check list at the bottom of the Release Notes:

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] New Linksys router

2014-01-11 Thread Rich Brown
Despite a couple calls and e-mails to Mike Chen and Karen Sohl last week, I have not had a response. I’ll keep trying this week after they return from the CES show. Rich On Jan 7, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote: The press release for the new Linksys WRT1900AC has

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM Question #5: Link Layer Adaptation Overheads

2014-01-11 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Rich, On Jan 11, 2014, at 17:29 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, Thanks for all the good responses to this question. I have incorporated the info into the SQM page on the wiki, so that it now gives broad recommendations for each link type, and refers people to the

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL

2014-01-11 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Rich, On Jan 11, 2014, at 17:29 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote: The VDSL option is burning up way too many of my brain cells. Given that VDSL may well use ATM, while VDSL2 is unlikely to use ATM, I think that it isn’t useful to include it as a top-level choice . In the new

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL

2014-01-11 Thread Rich Brown
Hi Sebastian, In the new pages, I propose removing the VDSL choice, leaving: - “ATM (any kind of DSL link)” and - “None” Well, that looks like a decent recommendation for the wiki. The SQM configuration page still needs to expose all three values, atm, ethernet, and none so

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL

2014-01-11 Thread Rich Brown
HI Sebastian, Well, that looks like a decent recommendation for the wiki. The SQM configuration page still needs to expose all three values, atm, ethernet, and none so that people can actually change things... So two questions really: 1) (From my previous note) What’s the difference

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Perfection vs. Good Enough

2014-01-11 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:31:59AM -0500, Rich Brown wrote: Folks, I am so pleased with the state of CeroWrt. The software has improved enormously, to the point that we all get really good performance from our routers at home. If you want a real eyeful of the progress we’ve made, check list

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Perfection vs. Good Enough

2014-01-11 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Rich, On Jan 11, 2014, at 17:31 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, I am so pleased with the state of CeroWrt. The software has improved enormously, to the point that we all get really good performance from our routers at home. If you want a real eyeful of the progress

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL

2014-01-11 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Rich, On Jan 11, 2014, at 18:55 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote: HI Sebastian, Well, that looks like a decent recommendation for the wiki. The SQM configuration page still needs to expose all three values, atm, ethernet, and none so that people can actually change

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Perfection vs. Good Enough

2014-01-11 Thread Rich Brown
Hi Sebastian, It is quite clear to me, that I failed to explain the matters surrounding ATM links properly. But if I can not explain this to a small group of technical experts there is no chance for me to explain this to lay persons. I will try my best to contribute to the more than

[Cerowrt-devel] improving performance on wifi under contention

2014-01-11 Thread Dave Taht
There are quite a few things I'd like to try before declaring cerowrt stable. That said, I'm pretty happy with the last release, and can probably live without some long desired features in order to retire the last release. So +1 on the enthusiasm there... I need to write down and publish here the

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Perfection vs. Good Enough

2014-01-11 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Rich, On Jan 11, 2014, at 19:47 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sebastian, It is quite clear to me, that I failed to explain the matters surrounding ATM links properly. But if I can not explain this to a small group of technical experts there is no chance for me

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL

2014-01-11 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Aaron, On Jan 11, 2014, at 21:23 , Aaron Wood wood...@gmail.com wrote: Rich, Sebastian, (and others), First, a hello. I've been lurking on the bufferbloat mailing list for a bit, and just joined here as well to better follow what's going on, and see if there's any way I can help.

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Cerowrt-devel Digest, Vol 26, Issue 20

2014-01-11 Thread Mike O'Dell
Let's do the tiiime warp again. google for linksys 1900ac -mo ___ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel