On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Rich Brown wrote:
Folks,
I am so pleased with the state of CeroWrt. The software has improved
enormously, to the point that we all get really good performance from our
routers at home. If you want a real eyeful of the progress we’ve made, check
list at the bottom of the
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Compared to the orders of magnitude we already get from fq codel, the sum
benefit
of these [Link Layer Adaptation] fixes is in the very small percentage points.
I do not agree with this sentiment, as I understood Dave was talking
about
Folks,
I am so pleased with the state of CeroWrt. The software has improved
enormously, to the point that we all get really good performance from our
routers at home. If you want a real eyeful of the progress we’ve made, check
list at the bottom of the Release Notes:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:31:59AM -0500, Rich Brown wrote:
Folks,
I am so pleased with the state of CeroWrt. The software has improved
enormously, to the point that we all get really good performance
from our routers at home. If you want a real eyeful of the progress
we’ve made, check list
Hi Rich,
On Jan 11, 2014, at 17:31 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
I am so pleased with the state of CeroWrt. The software has improved
enormously, to the point that we all get really good performance from our
routers at home. If you want a real eyeful of the progress
Hi Sebastian,
It is quite clear to me, that I failed to explain the matters
surrounding ATM links properly. But if I can not explain this to a small
group of technical experts there is no chance for me to explain this to lay
persons. I will try my best to contribute to the more than
Hi Rich,
On Jan 11, 2014, at 19:47 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
It is quite clear to me, that I failed to explain the matters
surrounding ATM links properly. But if I can not explain this to a small
group of technical experts there is no chance for me
