Title: include vs custom tag
I'm
seeing it on one of our test servers as .5 ms avg to run an include, and 1 ms to
run a custom tag. Can anyone else verify that the custom tag would take about
twice the time?
-Original Message-From: Dunwiddie, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: include vs custom tag
Curious. If you have time, can you explain what you
mean exactly when you say you are going to use custom tags for the framework?
A.
- Original Message -
From:
Dunwiddie, Bruce
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:29
06, 2003 11:02
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion]
include vs custom tag
Curious. If you have time, can you explain what
you mean exactly when you say you are going to use custom tags for the
framework?
A.
- Original Message -
From:
Dunwiddie
Title: include vs custom tag
what
version of fusebox are you changing?
-Original Message-From: Dunwiddie, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
11:11 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[KCFusion] include vs custom tag
I'll
leave the answer
: [KCFusion]
include vs custom tag
what
version of fusebox are you changing?
-Original Message-From: Dunwiddie, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
11:11 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[KCFusion] include vs custom tag
I'll leave
Crocker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:23
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion]
include vs custom tag
I've
built some substantially huge CF sites, and using cfmodule instead of
cfinclude wherever you can is critical. Execution time
