Hi!
I am trying to create a document containing various probability values for
weather forecasts. But I do have some problems finding out how to express what
I want to say using the cf metadata standard.
I want to express such things as 25th percentile precipitation amount (based
on ensemble
Dear Vegard
I want to express such things as 25th percentile precipitation amount
(based on ensemble data), and probability that air temperature will be within
2.5 degrees of the forecast. How should I do this?
You are right, this case has not yet been dealt with, although the guidelines
Dear All,
I have received an enquiry from Kevin Tansey regarding these standard names
that were proposed and discussed in July under a number of different mailing
list threads: 'Request for new standard name'
(http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2011/022117.html ), 'More
Thank you, Jonathan! :)
So, a bit more concrete, this is option 1:
float rain_25(time, y, x);
rain_25:standard_name = precipitation_amount;
rain_25:cell_methods = realization: percentile(25);
The only problem I see with this is that in the resulting cdm realization is
not used anywhere,
Dear Roy,
Can you be a bit more concrete about why you prefer the second alternative?
-- Vegard
- Original Message -
Fra: Roy K. Lowry r...@bodc.ac.uk
Til: Jonathan Gregory j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk, Vegard B??nes
vegard.bo...@met.no
Kopi: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Sendt: 15.
Hello Vergand,
One of my jobs is running a parameter vocabulary that currently has over 27,000
entries. Much of its bulk is due to the assignment of multiple parameter names
for each step in a numeric sequence - such as radiation wavelengths or sediment
grain-size expressed as percentiles.
Hi Vegard:
I see some of these kinds of things from NCEP, encoded in GRIB, and Im
still trying to understand what they are. So, some questions from a
non-modeler:
On 11/15/2011 2:10 AM, Vegard Bønes wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to create a document containing various probability values for
Most of the discussion so far has centered on (1). But this raises
some other issues:
2) probability that air temperature will be within 2.5 degrees of the forecast
This is clearly trying to get at something akin to what we do with the
standard_error standard name modifier and the
Hi John,
All the assumptions you state are correct.
Regarding the usage of the data, there exists a specialized application that
uses this data. The problem is that others are interested in the same data, and
I have no control over how they will use it. Because of that, I want the
generated
