Hello all.
I'd agree that choosing available standard names for tide gauge related data
hasn't been obvious.
My comment is that tide level is a special type of vertical reference datum but
one that that isn't unique.
For example, subtracting a published tide prediction from observation data is
> John Graybeal wrote:
> +1. A notification of each new trac ticket would be ideal in my book, then I
> can subscribe. I'd rather explicitly subscribe to the trac discussions I care
> about.
>
> While I appreciate that there is a lot of traffic inherent in the discussions
> of
> each variable,
Dear CF maintainers,
we would like to propose a few new standard names, a new set of values
for the standard name 'land_cover', and standard name modifiers. The
names are proposals for variables used by the climate change initiative
of the European Space Agency for the essential climate variab
Dear All,
Thanks for all your responses.
I think that the best solution so far is to use the existing
"sea_surface_height_correction_due_to_air_pressure_and_wind_at_high_frequency",
even if I'm quite unsure about the "_at_high_frequency" part... (I'm
still waiting an answer of our scientists a
