Hi all,
Thanks for the considered responses. It looks like we have a consensus
on a change to remove increasing from the trajectory feature type. As
things stand, I plan to raise a defect ticket in a couple of days.
You may also have spotted the increasing requirement in the
descriptions for the
If no one has any objections, i move that we accept this ticket:
Adding the geostationary projection.
https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/72
the changes needed to the spec are at the bottom of the ticket, we didnt
know how to change the top part.
I personally have no objections, but acting as an ad hoc
moderator-lite, does Randy's suggestion from the 22nd March need
agreeing on, one way or another?
All the best
David
Original message from John Caron (10AM 10 May 12)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:35:04 -0600
From: John Caron
David:
what specific suggestion are you referring to ?
very respectfully,
randy
-- Original Message --
From: David Hassell d.c.hass...@reading.ac.uk
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 19:10:20 +0100
I personally have no objections, but acting as an ad hoc
First Announcement
Dear colleague,
The GEO AQ CoP is a self-organized voluntary group that fosters the application
of Earth observations to air quality management and science. Its participants
and its main beneficiaries are members of national and international science
teams, data
