Hi Heiko and David,
Its been awhile since I looked at this but I don't think the Trac ticket
covers the order of the dimensions. Here's the PR I put together in
February for the missing string length dimension issue. It adds definitions
for dimensions but does nothing regarding dimension order.
Many thanks, Jonathan.
I think all our comments are converging on a similar approach, so I expect
we'll be able to agree the rest of the LS3MIP names shortly.
Best wishes,
Alison
--
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data
Dear Alison and Martin
Here are comments I sent last week - maybe they've been covered by others
since then.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Jonathan Gregory
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Final 17 terms for CMIP6 LS3MIP.
Dear Martin
> 1.2 albsn
Dear All,
No comments have been received regarding the names proposed for DAMIP. I think
the names, units and definitions are fine, so I am now accepting all these
names for publication in the standard name table. They will be added in the
June update.
Best wishes,
Alison
--
Alison
Dear Martin, Karl and Steve,
Thank you for the proposing these two names and the comments received so far.
fraction_of_rainfall_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
'The phrase "surface_snow" means snow lying on the surface.'
fraction_of_solid_precipitation_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
'The
Dear Martin, Karl and Jonathan,
I wrote most of this email late on Friday evening, before Martin and Karl's
comments over the weekend. However, I think it is largely consistent with the
later discussion. I have amended my comments on the evaporation (2.1, 2.2),
evapotranspiration (2.3) and
Dear David,
thanks, I agree, it sounds very related. I have no possiblity to check,
either. Not sure if the dimension ordering is mentioned there.
Heiko
On 2018-06-08 17:38, David Hassell wrote:
> Dear Heiko,
>
> According the trac summary
>
