Dear Jonathan,
On 05/04/2019 14:16, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear Mike and Klaus
>
> Thanks for your emails. I understand your points, but it seems to me that what
> we have proposed will not make life significantly more difficult.
> Specifically,
>
> (1) We propose to have one discuss
Dear Martin
Yes, quite right, thanks. These instructions need to be updated.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
-
> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:35:38 +
> From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
> To: "Signell, Richard" , Daniel Lee
>
> Cc:
Dear Mike and Klaus
Thanks for your emails. I understand your points, but it seems to me that what
we have proposed will not make life significantly more difficult. Specifically,
(1) We propose to have one discuss repository taking over all the functions
of the current email list, which is for
[I'm personally happy with Github, but count as an interested person / long
time lurker!]
A lot of open source projects resolve this problem by splitting the
conversation into two mailing lists. One is typically "-devel" for developers
(in this case, anyone working on the standard or
Dear Jonathan,
for what it's worth, I am with Chris on this one.
Imho a mailing list is the right format to shoot a question when you
don't yet know exactly the approach (is it a feature request? a bug?
just a clarification?) and who exactly you should ask. This way you
reach all interested
Dear Jonathan,
I wholly support your proposal.
Many thanks,
David
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 16:57, Jonathan Gregory
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> As you know, CF currently uses this email list for discussion of standard
> name
> proposals and all other matters except for proposals to change the
>
Dear Chris
GitHub can fulfil the same function of discussion as the email list, through
discussion on an issue, which can be done entirely by email once the issue has
been opened on GitHub. GitHub will send the comments on the issues to the
LLNL CF email list, so that they will continued to be
