Dear Martin, dear All,
it is emerging that groups are making errors in implementing the carbon cycle
data requests - especially regarding the units of carbon fluxes.
The issue is confusion over whether to report kg of CARBON or kg of CO2.
The intended correct answer is buried deep within
...@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
-Original Message-
From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 12 April 2018 15:53
To: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; Jones, Chris D
<chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
-Original Message-
From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 05 April 2018 13:09
To: Jones, Chris D <chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk>; Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
<alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: New standard names for C4
.uk]
Sent: 05 April 2018 08:25
To: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; Jones, Chris D
<chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: New standard names for C4MIP - part 2
Dear Alison, Chris,
I have a few questions
- UKRI STFC [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 04 April 2018 20:37
To: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; Jones, Chris D
<chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: New standard names for C4MIP - part 2
Dear Alison, Chris,
I'v
Thanks Alison,
I think we're getting close to agreeing all of these. Comments below, but in
summary:
Already agreed (so I deleted text below for brevity): 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13,
14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26
Now agreed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 21
Still to agree: 15, 16, 24, 27, 28
Thanks,
-mail: chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
-Original Message-
From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 April 2018 10:42
To: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; Jones, Chris D
<chris.d.jo...@metoffice.go
884514 Fax: +44 (0)1392 885681
E-mail: chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jones,
Chris D
Sent: 20 March 2018 17:21
To: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
y, although we do have some existing names that refer to
soil_pools. I guessed the unit from the quantity - is it correct?
This quantity is meant to complement the respiration one and give the turnover
rate, hence units simply "per second, s-1". Each modelled soil carbon pool will
ha
[mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 09 March 2018 07:57
To: Jones, Chris D <chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: RE: New standard names for C4MIP
Dear Chris,
Thanks for getting back to me. We seem to be making good progress with these
names.
For those you
epresents a loss term. i.e. a
positive value of wetlandCH4cons implies the amount of methane in the
atmosphere is decreasing
--
Dr Chris Jones
Head, Earth System and Mitigation Science Team
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, U.K.
Tel: +44 (0)1392 884514 Fax: +44
11 matches
Mail list logo
