Dear Martin,
Thanks for proposing the new names.
They are probabilities, as Jonathan says.
Regards,
Alejandro
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Gregory
> Sent: 03 November 2016 22:08
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Regards,
>
> Alejandro
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: martin.juckes at
> stfc.ac.uk<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
> [mailto:martin.juckes at
> stf
nal Message-
> From: martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
> Sent: 12 October 2016 19:05
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Cc: Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro
> Subject: Usage of histogram_of_X_over_Z
>
> Hello,
>
> There are two standard names of the form
Dear Alison,
That's great. Thank you very much for your reply.
Regards,
Alejandro
> -Original Message-
> From: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk [mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk]
> Sent: 21 April 2016 15:27
> To: Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: R
t;ice" used for
> other frozen substances than water (including "dry ice") but I don't believe
> we use it in that more general sense in CF standard names.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
> - Forwarded message from "Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro&quo
t;time: point within days time:
> mean over days".
>
> regards,
> Karl
>
> On 2/10/16 7:56 AM, Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro wrote:
> > Dear CF community,
> >
> > I am trying to create a dataset that contains monthly mean diurnal cycles of
> radiative fluxes (i.e
Dear CF community,
I am trying to create a dataset that contains monthly mean diurnal cycles of
radiative fluxes (i.e. the average day of each month), but I am not sure how to
do this in a CF-compliant way. Example 7.10 does this for one month (Section
7.4 on Climatological statistics), so it
e of
> radiation_wavelength or radiation_frequency should be included to specify
> either
> the wavelength or frequency.
>
> Having said that, should we also consider to include the humidity state of the
> aerosol? That would require relative_humidity as additional coordinate
> v
Dear All,
I'd like to propose a new standard name, which as far as I can see doesn't
currently exist in the CF table:
Name: aerosol_single_scattering_albedo
Units: 1
Description: Fraction of radiation scattered out of a pencil of radiation after
one encounter with an aerosol particle for a
number_concentration_of_ice_crystals_in_air_at_ice_cloud_top
so I think ice_cloud would be OK to use if that's what you mean.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro
alejandro.bo...@metoffice.gov.uk -
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:25:21 +
From: Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro alejandro.bo
Dear All,
I would like to propose new standard names for liquid and ice cloud fractions
(as far as I can see, they don't exist).
I am not sure if they follow the spirit of the CF conventions because cloud
phase is not a well defined concept. I would appreciate your comments on this.
Regards,
Dear CF list,
I'd like to propose the following standard name:
volume_extinction_coefficient_in_air_due_to_cloud
Units: m-1
Definition, following the aerosol extinction coefficient:
The volume extinction coefficient is the fractional change of radiative flux
per unit path length. Extinction is
Dear All,
Do we need to include any reference to instrument, platform or
satellite? It seems to me that the complexity arises because the
reference lines from which the angle is defined are different in
different applications. Wouldn't it be better to use zenith_angle and
scan_angle with respect
13 matches
Mail list logo
