>
> >
> > -Original Message----- From: CF-metadata
> > [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Hattersley,
> > Richard Sent: 04 February 2015 09:04 To: CF Metadata List Subject:
> > Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
> >
;
>
> -Original Message- From: CF-metadata
> [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Hattersley,
> Richard Sent: 04 February 2015 09:04 To: CF Metadata List Subject:
> Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have a crea
Dear Jonathan,
I think that for checking that your version is correct, I would
compare it with the official existing PDF of CF 1.6. Do you have
the DocBook source for that, corresponding to
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
I've briefly looked at Richard's html example and AsciiDoc source.
I'm impressed by the readability of the AsciiDoc source, something which
is lacking in DocBook. This would make it much more practical for
people to edit
[mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 16 February 2015 11:54
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Dear Richard
This looks really beautiful. :-) Thank you for your hard work on it.
Looking through
Dear Richard
Thanks for addressing the example-numbering.
Can you generate a PDF?
I can ... but there will probably need to be another thread of work to iron
out any wrinkles in the PDF conversion software. Now that the single-page
HTML version has made good progress I'll start to give
@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
re: http://cf-metadata.github.io/cf-conventions.html
I've been tinkering in the evenings and now the AsciiDoc form of the
conventions is somewhere near alpha release quality. It still has some
small quirks here
are very welcome.
Regards,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Hattersley, Richard
Sent: 04 February 2015 09:04
To: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Dear all,
I have a created
:21
To: Signell, Richard
Cc: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
there is still a fair amount of work left to be done converting the document.
Is that something that will improve with your improvements to the
conversion tool, or will some community
-metadata.github.io/cf.html#ortho_multi
Regards,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey F. Painter [mailto:paint...@llnl.gov]
Sent: 27 January 2015 17:19
To: Hattersley, Richard; Gregory, Jonathan; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Richard,
Wow, thanks for doing all this hard work for the CF community!
I think Asciidoc is okay since it renders in Github and, as you say, has a
richer model more analogous to docbook.
Looking at:
http://cf-metadata.github.io/cf
,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Hattersley, Richard
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:50
To: Gregory, Jonathan; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Jonathan,
Thanks
. Painter [mailto:paint...@llnl.gov]
Sent: 27 January 2015 17:19
To: Hattersley, Richard; Gregory, Jonathan; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
I've briefly looked at Richard's html example and AsciiDoc source.
I'm impressed by the readability
Dear John, Seth and all.
- Forwarded message from John Graybeal jbgrayb...@mindspring.com -
On Jan 27, 2015, at 08:31, Jonathan Gregory j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk wrote:
...all changes ever since the first version are still shown as provisional
because we have no rule for accepting
Jonathan, thanks for this update, just the information I was looking for. I
agree this is a good opportunity for this discussion, and a good one to start
on the list.
In what follows, I explore the need for a provisional period, and advocate its
elimination. Instead we can add a simple
Of Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:32
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Dear Richard
Thank you very much for trying this out. It looks really good. Not all
the formatting is quite right, as I am sure you know e.g
,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:32
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Dear Richard
Thank you very much for trying this out
Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:32
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Dear Richard
Thank you very much for trying this out. It looks really good. Not all
Dear all,
Summary for the time-pressed reader:
- Some of us would like to simplify the workflow for editing the CF conventions.
- I've made a work-in-progress demo here:
http://cf-metadata.github.io/cf-conventions.html.
- The demo is automatically built from AsciiDoc sources here:
These are wonderful news! The editing, tracking, and publishing workflow
will be extremely easy if this is adopted. Not to say that it will be more
democratic as well thanks to GitHub PRs.
I have one question and two offer.
Question: Why Asciidoc instead of Markdown? (I noticed that, like
the prior versions to GitHub if necessary or if the
latest DocBook version is updated in the meantime.
Richard
From: Filipe Pires Alvarenga Fernandes [mailto:ocef...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:21
To: Hattersley, Richard
Cc: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing
.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Hattersley, Richard
richard.hatters...@metoffice.gov.uk -
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:03:48 +
From: Hattersley, Richard richard.hatters...@metoffice.gov.uk
To: CF Metadata List cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Editing
@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Dear Richard
Thank you very much for trying this out. It looks really good. Not all the
formatting is quite right, as I am sure you know e.g. in the examples, and
especially in Appendix D. I see that the doc doesn't say which
...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:32
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow update
Dear Richard
Thank you very much for trying this out. It looks really good. Not all
the formatting is quite right, as I am sure
24 matches
Mail list logo
