...@stfc.ac.uk>
Cc: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP) <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; Michaela
Hegglin <m.i.hegg...@reading.ac.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Jonathan Gregory
<j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Four standard names for the AerChemMIP data requ
C,RAL,RALSP); Jonathan Gregory; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Four standard names for the AerChemMIP data request
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you for the proposal for four names for AerChem
Dear Alison
> We have four existing volume scattering names:
> volume_scattering_function_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water
> volume_scattering_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water
> volume_scattering_coefficient_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles
>
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Martin
Juckes - UKRI STFC
Sent: 20 April 2018 13:33
To: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Four standard names for the AerChemMIP data request
Sorry, that was
d.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Four standard names for the AerChemMIP data request
Dear Martin
If it's OK for you as well, I'd prefer "uptake", which Michaela suggested as
an alternative to "flux", because it indicates the sign convention. Or "uptake
flux" if
sign convention.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
> - Forwarded message from Michaela Hegglin Hegglin
> <m.i.hegg...@reading.ac.uk> -
>
> > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:51:16 +
> > From: Michaela Hegglin Hegglin <m.i.hegg...@reading.a
rds,
Martin
From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
Sent: 19 April 2018 16:26
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Four standard names for the AerChemMIP data re
tadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Four standard names for the AerChemMIP data
> request
>
> Dear Martin, Jonathan,
>
> > The generic quantity that AerChemMIP is interested in, Phytotoxic ozone
> >
adata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
Sent: 18 April 2018 17:41
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Four standard names for the AerChemMIP data request
Dear Martin
> Proposed name: integral_wrt_time_of_stomatal_oz
Dear Martin
> Proposed name: integral_wrt_time_of_stomatal_ozone_flux_excess
I appreciate that not all fluxes have their sign convention mentioned in the
name, but in the case of precipitation, for example, I think it's obvious -
that's not quite so with ozone_flux, I would say - on reflection,
Hello All,
We require four additional standard names for AerChemMIP, for 3 parameters plus
one for a threshold.
(1) lossn2o: Monthly Loss of atmospheric Nitrous Oxide [mol m-3 s-1]
This is very similar to the existing CF Standard name for methane loss rate:
11 matches
Mail list logo
