Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

,RALSP) Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Jonathan Gregory; Elena Shevliakova Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables Hi Alison, This all looks good to me. I think we are just about there. I've been updating our request for LUMIP to reflect all the changes and will send revised version to

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Hi Alison, This all looks good to me. I think we are just about there. I've been updating our request for LUMIP to reflect all the changes and will send revised version to Martin. Thanks, Dave On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:45 AM, wrote: > Dear Dave, > > Thanks for

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Dear Dave, Thanks for your patience as we iron out all the final details. As before, the summary of the status of all the LUMIP names can be viewed at http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1?status=active==LUMIP+and+display=Filter. A few more of the names are now accepted for publication.

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

on Pamment > *Cc:* Jonathan Gregory; Elena Shevliakova; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables > > Hi Alison, > > My responses are below, but they mostly consist of "yes, I agree." > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, <

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Hi Alison, My responses are below, but they mostly consist of "yes, I agree." On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, wrote: > Dear Dave and Jonathan, > > Thank you for the discussion of the product names and I see that we have > now settled on

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Dear Dave and Jonathan, Thank you for the discussion of the product names and I see that we have now settled on wood_and_agricultural_products, which I agree is easier to understand for the non-expert. This same terminology will also need to be adopted for C4MIP so that we have a consistent

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

> So, I would suggest: wood_and_agricultural_products. Splendid! Thanks, Jonathan ___ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

edu> > To: Alison Pamment <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk> > CC: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>, cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables > > I checked with Chris Jones of C4MIP and he argues for (a) and I agree. > > Fo

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

-- > > From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of > > Jonathan Gregory > > Sent: 22 November 2016 18:32 > > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables > > > > Dear Dave and Alison > > > > Ah

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Laboratory R25, 2.22 Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. > -Original Message- > From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Gregory > Sent: 22 November 2016 18:32 > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-m

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

I agree about the soil water variable. Revised name is good. As far as product pools, Alison is correct. It is anything from harvested vegetation that is made into a "thing" and therefore the carbon is not sent straight back to the atmosphere or to the ground. The 'thing' that is made includes

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Dear Jonathan, Thanks for looking through the LUMIP names again. > * mass_content_of_water_in_soil would sound clearer to me than > soil_mass_water_ > content, which I misread as "soil mass". It's fine for me but I note that we > used soil_moisture_content originally because it's always called

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

@ucar.edu, j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk, el...@princeton.edu > CC: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables > > Dear Dave, > > Thank you for proposing new standard names for LUMIP and apologies for the > delay in responding. Thanks also to Jonathan for comme

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

two variables separately, which we originally labeled something like: tendency_of_area_fraction_transitioned_out_of_land_use_tile (s-1) annual gross fraction that was transferred out of this tile to other land use tiles tendency_of_area_fraction_transitioned_into_land_use_tile (s-1) annual gross fract

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Thanks for your detailed assessment Jonathan, Answers embedded below. Thanks, Dave On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote: > Dear Dave > > Thanks for the text listing of your proposals. Here are a few comments: > > These ones are existing standard

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Dear Dave Thanks for the text listing of your proposals. Here are a few comments: These ones are existing standard names: surface_net_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_all_land_processes moisture_content_of_soil_layer soil_moisture_content I see that there

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

Jonathan Gregory requested that we list in text format. For each variable, fields are Short Name, Proposed CFStandard Name, Long Name, and Units. necbLut surface_net_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_all_land_processes net rate of C accumulation (or loss) on land

[CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

For LUMIP we would like to propose several new variables, listed in the attached excel spreadsheet, to the list. Thanks, Dave Lawrence and Elena Shevliakova CMIP6DataRequest_LUMIP_propose_to_list.xlsx Description: MS-Excel 2007 spreadsheet ___