-metadata-
boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:05 AM
To: heiko.kl...@met.no; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] repost warming up old stuff - part 4:
emissions (hit send too early)
Dear Heiko,
In response to your
Hi Martin,
I guess you are referring to your emails from
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2011/027072.html .
I agree that the CF-standard names haven't been updated in quite a while
(since July?).
But it seems like there are still some open issues concerning the
sectors. I
: cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-
boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Heiko Klein
Sent: 07 March 2012 08:52
To: Schultz, Martin
Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] repost warming up old stuff - part 4:
emissions (hit send too early)
Hi Martin,
I
: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:52 AM
To: Schultz, Martin
Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] repost warming up old stuff - part 4: emissions
(hit send too early)
Hi Martin,
I guess you are referring to your emails from
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2011
Dear all,
this is my final attempt to propose these new emission standard names. The
proposal dates back to June 8th, 2011 and has never been implemented. Here, I
provide the list of specific standard_name attributes we would like to see in
the list. The old emails detail the concept and
