I think I'm (slowly) getting this, but a few thoughts on language:
"the CF data model is independent of the encoding, and the symmetric matrix is
logically what is going on here."
That makes sense but the language I first noticed said a "symmetric array" -- I
think we need to be careful about
Hi @ChrisBarker-NOAA and @pp-mo,
I have been away and am just catching up with the conversation. Thank you for
an interesting read!
> From the data model perspective, there needs to be SOME way to define the
> connectivity. how it's done is a matter of the "encoding", yes?
Absolutely.
Dear @JonathanGregory, @AndersMS, and all,
> Conformance
>
> For "Each tie_point_variable token specifies a tie point variable that must
> exist in the file, and each interpolation_variable token specifies an
> interpolation variable that must exist in the file," I think all you can say
> is
Created in error - sorry!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #333.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See issue #XXX for discussion of these changes.
# Release checklist
- [ ] Authors updated in `cf-conventions.adoc`?
- [ ] Next version in `cf-conventions.adoc` up to date? Versioning inspired by
