Jeff Painter tells me that "Standard names have been moved to Github along with
the CF Conventions document and most of what it references. See
If the grib tables are reasonably up to date, I think we should retain links to
them; it would help some users correctly identify data of interest outside of
CF.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
If an intention of mapping the CMIP6 variable names with CF standard_name
entries, that would be relatively trivial, if you consider the general example
I suggest that the sentences are removed altogether (the links Paul gives goes
to the web archive). In particular references to GRIB tables may be outdated.
An up-to-date cross-reference table between standard names and CMIP variables
seems like it could be useful, but is maybe better placed
There are archived versions of these tables from 15th February 2013 at:
Doing a quick search of our (PCMDI's) latest website, I haven't found these
pages (yet). Doing a web search, I came across a [2014
With reference to the use case provided in
[convention/discuss#155](https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/discuss/issues/155__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!m53z1g8rmF4oa7DTmxFPXLoatKeXJK-rkbdhYLQeO7PQOnvjJLFu2-rDk-5i8mbAaVdxaaQcp-Y$
) --- two variables both having ``standard_name =
# Title
Three not resolving hyperlinks in last sentence of section 3.3.
# Detailed Proposal
I would like to request that the following three non-resolving hyperlinks are
corrected.
"Here are lists of equivalences between the CF standard names and the standard
names from the [ECMWF GRIB
Thanks, David. Yes, I will write a pull request with this text if no-one
objects soon.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Dear Jonathan, Looks good - no objection from me. Do you want to write a Pull
Request?
Thanks,
David
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
In
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/discuss/issues/155__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!mfJaB4CUzVG70gMwLsn4NCDOHB_EztOTEMDN2iHwJ1ozSQQSyUZf2ptPvesV5t40hwcl518oMxw$
@jonathanlilly has pointed out that the current text of section 3.3 might
appear to mean that a given
11 matches
Mail list logo
