Closed #271.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/271#event-3540248283
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from
Done. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/271#issuecomment-657648695
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from
Three weeks have passed without further contributions. With a status of
consensus, the proposal is now accepted. Will someone with privileges on the
repo please merge the pull request and close this issue? Thanks!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
Three weeks have passed since the last comment on this issue regarding proposed
changes to the CF data model text. The current status indicates consensus, with
@dblodgett-usgs , @JonathanGregory , and @twhiteaker supporting the proposal.
If no further contributions are made within three weeks
I have reviewed the present text and it seems fine to me. Thank you, all.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/271#issuecomment-637003310
This list forwards
@twhiteaker Thanks - superceded text has been removed
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/271#issuecomment-634812086
This list forwards relevant
@dblodgett-usgs I see, now, thanks, In that light I propose changing:
_For a given coordinate construct, all the parts of all the cells must be of
the same one of these three
kinds, which are called "geometry types"._
to simply
```
All parts of all the cells must be of the same one of these
@davidhassell -- I'm happy with your proposed changes.
Regarding the coordinate construct *instance* vs coordinate construct *data
model*, let me try and clarify.
When I see:
> For a given coordinate construct ...
I read that as there are *n* coordinate construct instances but I think what
Hi Dave,
> The text scans well. I would have benefited from a stand-alone set of
> definitions for these and subsequent highlighting of the normative terms or
> maybe just highlighting of the normative terms in the text. Terms I'm
> thinking about are:
Auxiliary coordinate constructs
The [updated
text](https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/270/files/788f8e3bdb88824a78ca17ea8ad5b73ec6ee26b4..c4f59ed3c44f78ae62f8748bc2468fe356eec5eb)
reads:
> In CF-netCDF, when a geometry container variable is present it explicitly
> describes the geometry type, identifies the
The text scans well. I would have benefited from a stand-alone set of
definitions for these and subsequent highlighting of the normative terms or
maybe just highlighting of the normative terms in the text. Terms I'm thinking
about are:
- Auxiliary coordinate constructs
- Dimension coordinate
The [rules](http://cfconventions.org/rules.html) state after three weeks have
passed without contributions, a summary is made along with a test netCDF file
if one does not already exist. When three weeks have passed with no
contributions following a summary, a decision is reached. Since the
Hello,
It has been pointed out that data model images in Appendix are not appearing in
the on-line latest version of the conventions
(http://cfconventions.org/cf-conventions/cf-conventions.html#appendix-CF-data-model).
Sorry about this!. It will clearly need fixing prior to the release of
# Title
Extend the data model for Geometries
# Moderator
@user
# Moderator Status Review [last updated: YY/MM/DD]
Brief comment on current status, update periodically
# Requirement Summary
The inclusion of geometry cells in CF-1.8
14 matches
Mail list logo
