Dear @AndersMS and Daniel @erget
I see. I misunderstood. If you think my version of the revised paragraph is OK,
it's fine to include it in your pull request for
Hi @JonathanGregory and @erget
We propose to change the firstagree with your proposed text. We have opened
this issue (Rework intro to Section 8: Accuracy & precision · Issue #330 ·
cf-convention/cf-conventions (github.com)) to address per-variable gzipping as
well as to verify that the usage
@JonathanGregory I'd pass this question on to @AndersMS who is doing the lion's
share of work on this topic - currently I don't have the overview if you had
other comments that would touch that paragraph, but we're addressing them in a
systematic way there, so if there's something that's
Dear Daniel @erget
I think it's fine to make this a separate issue, but in that case, will you
leave that paragraph unchanged (as in version 1.8) in
