Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Is it possible to use cell methods for percentiles statistics estimated for more than 2 axes (25 axes) ? (#342)

Closed #342. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Is it possible to use cell methods for percentiles statistics estimated for more than 2 axes (25 axes) ? (#342)

Thanks I'll follow this discussion then. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Is it possible to use cell methods for percentiles statistics estimated for more than 2 axes (25 axes) ? (#342)

@DikraK you are correct that this information can at the moment not be encoded in the cell methods. Your request is rather timely since we are discussing similar issues in cf-convention/discuss#131, but no consensus on how to add this to the conventions has been reached yet. If you want to put

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Is it possible to use cell methods for percentiles statistics estimated for more than 2 axes (25 axes) ? (#342)

Hi @zklaus, thanks a lot for all the valuable information you provided. I may have missed something but I still cannot find how to add the information on the percentile values across the 25 fields. In [Appendix

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarification of requirements on calendar attribute of a bounds variable (#265)

I think that it would be OK to require the same data type as well the same value. In fact I slightly prefer identity of both type and value, because to me it seems that providing something which is _exactly_ redundant is more like providing nothing at all, which is what we want. -- You are