I think that it would be OK to require the same data type as well the same value. In fact I slightly prefer identity of both type and value, because to me it seems that providing something which is _exactly_ redundant is more like providing nothing at all, which is what we want.
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/265*issuecomment-940993397__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!jZAyaRU-S8sBqamYWqw_Ih02zKC4bhC9qeTg4MYapUz8EyCSVF7P7_LTKZKur5GTwSh6wb3JPu4$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
