I agree with @roy-lowry on having NULL attributes. Given the input by
@roy-lowry and @JonathanGregory above I am not sure whether this should be
included or not. If included, another keyword than surface should be used, but
neither coverage (which is used in many other contexts) is appropriate
> Now, however (twenty years later), standard names are well-established in
> their own right, I would say, and the mapping between different metadata
> standards belongs better outside the standard, in neutral territory.
I fully agree with this and the activities of ENVO are better suited for
Although primarily working with polar orbiters this suggested change make sense
to me. I fully acknowledge the challenge identified by Randy, but think that
shouldn't prevent this update and I think the proposal as stated also
acknowledge this.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
I support this, it will be very welcome.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/243#issuecomment-584844080
This list forwards relevant notifications from
I support the constraint indicated above. Especially allowing slashes and
backslashes in names will be confusing.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I support this proposal to achieve a consistent approach.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/230#issuecomment-574175582
This list forwards relevant
Given that, would that call for search by proximity as the only approach in
section 5, Scope? Having all potential approaches complicates interpretation of
the data and building services on top of them. Stating absolute or relative
relations explicitly would be beneficial although I see the
> A grid mapping variable is required if the given coordinate variables are
> relative to a planetary latitude longitude datum, or to describe the figure
> of the Earth used to define the latitude and longitude coordinates, or to
> describe another coordinate reference system definition used by
