The problem with that Dave is that even the Enterprise customers
won't be able to find developers eventually, if the small business
and educational use is left behind. We're already starting to see
this developer shortage and eventually companies are going to get
tired of having to train
Yeah, they would have a fix alright... our next version
will be out in 3 months... $695 for the upgrade that will
include several bug fixes.
For a fix for google webservice integration its far more likely that
Adobe would provide the fix as a hot-fix than roll it into an update
with a separate
i am subscribed to google alerts for coldfusion 8 and just received
this link to
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com.au/topics/article.asp?DocID=1288818
apart from a somewhat worrying subject of the article (it is actually an
excerpt from a book), it contains an interesting googling result -
On Tuesday 05 Feb 2008, Peterson, Chris wrote:
add a captcha to the login screen ... would stop any mass-login attempt
A lot of CAPTCHA can be defeated by OCR, even complicated ones can be broken
(say) 30% of the time, if the protected service is worth that (like, say,
Yahoo) people will do
Hi
My my site, i used CFDOCUMENT tag to generate a dynamic PDF file and save it to
physical location.
It used to work properly.
Now it is not working at all. The page hangs up when the PDF file generation
code is parsed.
Can anyone please help me on this issue?
thanks in advance.
Use Firebug to watch the request. Those requests should show on your
'Console' tab, and when expanded you can view the 'Post' variables. I'm
betting you have a casing issue. JS is picky like that, and I've been
caught more than a few times over the years.
Steve Cutter Blades
Adobe Certified
Right now any dynamic document generation for PDF will not support the
tagged format (which is necessary to make accessible).
I've talked to Adobe til I'm blue in the face. Maybe some others saying the
same thing will help.
Historically, Macromedia used 3rd party libraries to create PDF's via
Yeah, I still remember when they changed the javascript functions that were
generated with CFTREE somewhere around the transition from 4.0 to 5.0 That
had a pretty big effect on one of our applications because it actually used
the functions and now it became unusable with the change they did.
On Wednesday 06 Feb 2008, Azadi Saryev wrote:
HTML 4,960,000,000
You do know you can have CFML templates with .html extensions, right ? Or any
other extension, for that matter.
It doesn't mean anything.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to interactively disintermediate performance-oriented models
on:
Thanks Josh. I hadn't really looked through them recently, though I was
thinking specifically about case studies of companies moving to CF from
competing technologies like PHP or MS SharePoint. It was my impression
(though I could be wrong) that their case studies were generally
confined to new
I also wonder how a Fusebox site would increment that count? There's only '
index.cfm'.
On Feb 6, 2008 8:37 AM, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 06 Feb 2008, Azadi Saryev wrote:
HTML 4,960,000,000
You do know you can have CFML templates with .html extensions, right ? Or
Tom Chiverton wrote:
You do know you can have CFML templates with .html extensions, right ? Or any
other extension, for that matter.
To be fair, that could also be said of any other non-HTML extension in
the list. However it also misses out the fact many sites don't use
extensions at all,
Rick...
The server I'm thinking of is our staging server. The only time it even has
any connections is when one of us is testing out code that's already been
developed on our personal machines.
I think the only way to know for certain is to just install it.
-Original Message-
From:
Taken out of the Crayola case study:
*Macromedia Products:
*Five Macromedia ColdFusion Studio 4.5, 4 Macromedia ColdFusion Enterprise
4.5.1, Macromedia Flash, Dreamweaver, Dreamweaver UltraDev, Fireworks,
FreeHand
And this is just an example of the content of these case studies!
Really, either
I check the file name and see if it already exists in the database.
If it does, then I return the error. If it doesn't exist, then go and
perform the cffile action.
This is the way you see it, but not the best and easiest way to do it.
This is the way I do it:
- upload the file and rename it on
Well it's always possible that Crayola JUST switched away from that.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Beru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SPAM: Re: ColdFusion: Some People Just Don't Know Any Better
Taken out of the Crayola case
Dennis... Learn something new everyday. I guess I did not know there was
bit operator in CF :)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Transact SQL question has me stumped
Mark,
I knew I would
Is there anyway to configure the CF to run a scheduled task every
M-W-F at a
specified time?
Schedule the task for everyday, and have the task check for the day and
CFABORT on bad days.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is
I meant... I didn't know there was a bit operator in MSSQL ... In my
defense I'm not feeling well today and I've had a variety of pills of
dubious quality and nature.
-mk
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:47 AM
To:
I'll wager somebody's description includes a comma.
I'll reinforce: use cfqueryparam
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
Hi:
I am using CF for while now but I have no other programing background. I
used Lynda.com video tutorials to learn CF and some other online tutorials
like EasyCFM.com. Several days efore I recieved two new CF8 tutorials from
Lynda.com(Lynda.com ColdFusion 8 Essential Training | Lynda.com
On Wednesday 06 Feb 2008, Ali wrote:
Maybe because I have no programing background with other
languages other than HTML.
Ahh.
What do you think?
I think you need a course on basic object orientated design principles e.g.
classes, methods, encapsulation, abstraction, inheritance etc.
Ali,
Definitely stick with it, for more complicated web applications CFC's really
do become essential. You can of course build large applications without the
use of CFC's as we all did before components came about but it tends to get
messy (thats not saying cfc's automatically make things tidy
The problem with that Dave is that even the Enterprise
customers won't be able to find developers eventually, if the
small business and educational use is left behind. We're
already starting to see this developer shortage and
eventually companies are going to get tired of having to
Hi,
The answer is a definite yes, you need to learn how to use CFCs. In fact,
just as in David Gassner's tutorials, in my own ColdFusion books I introduce
CFCs very early, and make them very usable and without adding complexity.
You are probably going to get quite a few responses to this
Here is a language agnostic tutorial:
http://homepages.north.londonmet.ac.uk/~chalkp/proj/ootutor/index.html
Having a closer look at that tutorial I think there will certainly be a
better one out there! Apologies
Dominic
--
Blog it up: http://fusion.dominicwatson.co.uk
Benign
I'm sure everyone on this list will say yes to learning oop right away.
Well, almost everyone. I'll point you instead to
productivityenhancement.com where you can download a framework called PLUM.
Plum is a framework that uses the best of what coldfusion was designed to
be...a quick, easy
You can think of cfc's as simply collections of functions grouped in a
file by subject.
That's certainly a good starting point but I think getting to grips with the
concepts of OOP (object oriented programming) before even looking at CFCs is
perhaps going to give you a better start. I think
Ive completely forgotten how to do this
.
I have this script
cfscript
function show_new(dt)
{
if(DateDiff(d,dt,Now()) LT 30)
{ return 'font color=redNew!/font'; };
return '';
}
/cfscript
I need to call it inside a li tag
I have this script
cfscript
function show_new(dt)
...
I need to call it inside a li tag
li style=list-style-type:square; margin-left:-18px;
margin-right: 8px;
li ...cfoutput#show_new(your_date_variable)#/cfoutput/li
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Just to add another voice to the chatter
knowing CFCs helps you make it more reusable and manageable
This is definitely one benefit of using CFCs. Arguably you can do this
without components, but when combined with other tools available to the
ColdFusion community, CFCs become the best way
Call it inline
liMy list itemscript
type=text/javascriptmyFunctionCall();/script/li
Nothing to do with your problem, but check out jQuery if you want an easier
life with JS.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart
Sent: 06 February 2008 16:43
To: CF-Talk
Subject: stupid
li#show_new(value)#/li
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: stupid cfscript/javascript question
I've completely forgotten how to do this..
I have this script
cfscript
function show_new(dt)
On Feb 6, 2008 7:26 PM, Ben Forta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The answer is a definite yes, you need to learn how to use CFCs. In
fact,
just as in David Gassner's tutorials, in my own ColdFusion books I
introduce
CFCs very early, and make them very usable and without adding complexity.
li style=list-style-type:square; margin-left:-18px; margin-right: 8px;
cfoutput
#show_new(dt)#
/cfoutput
/li
--
Gary Gilbert
http://www.garyrgilbert.com/blog
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
Has anyone done that? the CFcontent tag is the closest thing pops up,
it does some job but still have tons of garbage. If possible I prefer
not to use third party bla bla.
I do not think there is a way to extract text only from a binary Word document
without using a third party component
*whistles*
I hope no one see my reply :OS
*whistles*
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2008 16:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: stupid cfscript/javascript question
Call it inline
liMy list itemscript
I personally think then don't delve into CFCs and OO at the sametime.
Nothing says CFCs need to be done in an OO fashion. In the long run though
OO is a good thing for any developer to learn. Seems like most books that
teach CF do not jump straight into CFCs and OO at the same time although
Is it possible for Coldfusion to
convert these files to be similar enough to overlay them?
You could overlay the images using the java image classes. Though I do not know
if the transparency will work the way you are expecting.
Thanks all...
Sorry for the brain fart
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:55 AM
To:
Cutter (CFRelated) wrote:
Use Firebug to watch the request. Those requests should show on your
'Console' tab, and when expanded you can view the 'Post' variables. I'm
betting you have a casing issue. JS is picky like that, and I've been
caught more than a few times over the years.
Thanks
Is that what I smell. I thought the guy in the cube next to me broke
wind. :)
Bruce
Scott Stewart wrote:
Thanks all...
Sorry for the brain fart
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release
Our business is sort of an ASP model where we have a single, main application
to which we essentially sell subscriptions to large clients. Over the years,
those clients have demanded unique changes to the app that have caused the main
code base to split into separate versions.
Currently we
Currently we run CF multi-server on JRun, so we have an
instance for each of our clients. For some reason, we've
always found this desirable, though we've never really seen
any clear benefits other than being able to maintain separate
CFAdmin settings and restart an instance without
Steven,
I would say that it is still quite important - especially if you wish to
leverage more memory on a larger server.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Steven Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Is the need for multiple CF
I agree with Dave. If customers feel they need control over their servers,
then they have that choice. Only other reason for mutli-instance would be
mappings / unique custom tags that they didn't want to make global and
such. I'm finding that the new mappings that you can do in CF8's
Whoa What about the ability to run your instances with different JVM
args and allocate memory and resources specifically? And what about
leveraging more than 1.6 gigs of memory using multi-instances? It seems to
me there are resource issues that multi instance addresses as well.
-Mark
Does these frameworks make things easier or just more complicated.
I'm working on a small-medium sized application and I hope I can use some
CFCs there but a framework if it makes everything even working with CFCs
easier would a huge help. Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance Ben
Right...
Until Adobe releases a 64bit version of CF, the JVM is limited to just 1gig,
even if your server has more. So using multiple instances is the only way to
get the most bang for your bux.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06,
On Feb 6, 2008 7:58 PM, Mark Fuqua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benign
I'm sure everyone on this list will say yes to learning oop right away.
Well, almost everyone. I'll point you instead to
productivityenhancement.com where you can download a framework called
PLUM.
Plum is a framework that
I agree with Dave. If customers feel they need control over
their servers, then they have that choice. Only other reason
for mutli-instance would be mappings / unique custom tags
that they didn't want to make global and such.
Well, that's not actually what I wrote. There are lots of
Yup, agreed that it should also be considered for anyone looking to setup a
multi-instance. Currently that doesn't fit our need or budget (according to
the owner). I'm just a lead developer plunking down projects for him to
cash out on. I don't get a say in hardware or software installation /
If you are confident that you can do the project using methods you
currently
use, I would say stick with what you know unless you have heaps of time.
To
start using an 'MVC' framework for example with no experience of CFC's is
going to add the confusion I think.
I like your idea of using
I've been toying around with the idea of wrapping my output objects in
Iterators on my View pages. The idea is that I'd like my Views to be
relatively independent of the datatype that they're trying to display. So
my View would be able to work with either a Query, Array of Structs, Array
of
I've been toying around with the idea of wrapping my output objects in
Iterators on my View pages. The idea is that I'd like my Views to be
relatively independent of the datatype that they're trying to display. So
my View would be able to work with either a Query, Array of Structs, Array
of
On Feb 6, 2008 1:51 PM, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's not actually what I wrote. There are lots of reasons for
using
multiple instances:
- isolation of services for security/administrative reasons
- isolation of services for stability reasons
- ability to configure
Is anyone familair enough with this combination to tell me the easiest way to
get a homesite style HTML tag menu on the CFeclipse perspective view?
thanks in advance
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
The only way you can pressure a company is to not buy its products.
I'm not sure that's entirely true. It may be the *best* way, but not the *only*
way. Have we really gotten the word out as a community to Adobe in terms of
what we are seeing and the trends that are happening? Sales numbers
On 2/6/08, Tim L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone familair enough with this combination to tell me the easiest way
to get a homesite style HTML tag menu on the CFeclipse perspective view?
thanks in advance
Not sure what type of menu you are referring to. As I would assume, you are
talking
Yep, and isn't this the biggest weakness of CF to date? Are other
technologies limited to 1GB or ram? PHP/.NET/RoR?
I can understand why myspace migrated away from CF. With sketchy session
replication and the fact that you can't have more then 1GB per instance,
it's just getting impossible
I've not read it but reading the reviews it seems just about perfect.
Doesn't look like it dummies anything which is important.
Remember to ignore the language specific stuff (java, C++, etc), maybe this
is obvious but it's the kind of thing I do all the time, i.e. read bits that
I don't need to
Isn't MS targeting enterprise customers as well? However, they made it easy
to get access to developers and tools. Giving away free copies to
universities, and having light versions of things available for free (SQL
Express, Visual Studio Express, etc).
Russ
-Original Message-
From:
I've been toying around with the idea of wrapping my output objects in
Iterators on my View pages. The idea is that I'd like my Views to be
relatively independent of the datatype that they're trying to display. So
my View would be able to work with either a Query, Array of Structs, Array
of
Where do I start
Nothing personal, in fact Plum looks pretty slick, but...
1) Filling out Wizards will not teach you how to ColdFusion or any other
language. Quite honestly if that is your approach you would be better off
using DreamWeaver (DW) from Adobe or Downloading or Visual Web
Hi there,
How are you doing this iterator exactly? I have just made and been using my
own dao iterator base component and it has so far been really fast and easy
to use (and dang handy, definately a good idea). I would loop like so:
cfloop condition=myIteratorObj.Next()
Yes, Plum is easy to learn, although I think most Plum users are much more
advanced than I am, so it is worth noting that it can grow with you as your
skills grow.
The documentation/tutorials are quite complete through the beginning levels
and you can probably work through the tutorials in an
There are a number of things that can cause a cfdocument tag to hang.
It seems that timeouts are never enforced for third-party calls like
images.
You only have given us an iceburg-tip piece of information though.
What version of CF are you on?
What updaters do you have installed?
Have you
Is debugging on? All the calls to the functions get tracked in debugging
which can add considerable overhead.
It might be more efficient to write these iterators in java and then
instantiate the java object in your code.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon Stierman
Incidentally, I have been using Model-Glue and I always pass the view the
query that the iterator contains (I use the iterator object for operations
on the data, etc) - afterall, the view needs only to READ the data, the
cfquery object is a perfect iterating object for this task.
Dominic
Yep, and isn't this the biggest weakness of CF to date? Are
other technologies limited to 1GB or ram? PHP/.NET/RoR?
This is a JVM limitation, not a CF limitation. And, it's platform-specific.
The memory limit for a 32-bit JVM is much higher on, say, Solaris - around 4
GB, if I recall
Russ --
I had debugging on. Turning it off reduced the average by about 500 ms on
the 1 record query, so that definitely helps some!
Dominic --
I'd love to see what you've got! Post them to this thread, or email them to
me, whichever you feel comfortable with.
Not sure with what's going
How are you doing this iterator exactly? I have just made and been using
my
own dao iterator base component and it has so far been really fast and
easy
to use (and dang handy, definately a good idea). I would loop like so:
Also check out Peter Bell's IBO (Iterating Business Object) concept
Any Idea why all of my users can access their mailbox by using a
cfexchange connection except one?
I can OWA with the name/password that is used in the connection string
and everything works fine, but Coldfusion complains of invalid access
when trying to access the users.
Access to the
Russ --
I had debugging on. Turning it off reduced the average by about 500 ms on
the 1 record query, so that definitely helps some!
Dominic --
I'd love to see what you've got! Post them to this thread, or email them to
me, whichever you feel comfortable with.
Not sure with what's going
The 2GB address space limit only exists on 32 bit architectures, correct? A
server running lets say Windows 2003 x64 Server or any flavor of x64 Linux
wouldn't have that limitation, correct? So why are we stuck using the
outdated 32bit JVM?
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts
I'm not sure that's entirely true. It may be the *best* way,
but not the *only* way. Have we really gotten the word out as
a community to Adobe in terms of what we are seeing and the
trends that are happening?
I don't even know what that means. Purchasing a product doesn't make you a
Yep, and isn't this the biggest weakness of CF to date? Are other
technologies limited to 1GB or ram? PHP/.NET/RoR?
The are if they are limited to pre-JAVA 1.6 (IIRC the version). The limit is
not a ColdFusion specific limit, but a limit it inherits from the underlining
Java. So any
On 2/6/08, Steven Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our business is sort of an ASP model where we have a single, main application
to which we essentially sell subscriptions to large clients. Over the years,
those clients have demanded unique changes to the app that have caused the
main code
Are other technologies limited to 1GB or ram?
Doesn't Java suffer from this same limitation? It is my understanding
that the memory limit is a Java thing, not a CF thing. Please correct
me if I'm wrong.
...the fact that you can't have more then 1GB per instance...
But don't instances
Whoa What about the ability to run your instances with different JVM
args and allocate memory and resources specifically? And what about
leveraging more than 1.6 gigs of memory using multi-instances? It seems to
me there are resource issues that multi instance addresses as well.
Okay, this
The 2GB address space limit only exists on 32 bit
architectures, correct? A server running lets say Windows
2003 x64 Server or any flavor of x64 Linux wouldn't have that
limitation, correct? So why are we stuck using the outdated
32bit JVM?
Maybe you should direct that question to
Yeh, mine is similar with some differences and some nice ideas from Reactor
(but with performance), anyways I've zipped some files and posted them here:
http://www.dominicwatson.co.uk/downloads/iterator.zip
Note, this was all intended for private use - not public release ;)
Let me know what you
On 2/6/08, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you need a course on basic object orientated design principles e.g.
classes, methods, encapsulation, abstraction, inheritance etc.
I don't agree with that at all.
the use of CFCs doesn't necessarily have anything to do with object
Russ --
I had debugging on. Turning it off reduced the average by about 500 ms on
the 1 record query, so that definitely helps some!
Dominic --
I'd love to see what you've got! Post them to this thread, or email them to
me, whichever you feel comfortable with.
Not sure with what's going
I guess you'd have to decide if you're gonna run it on the same server
as CF in production.. and if not, running it on the SAME server in
staging means that your environments do not match.
I don't know all that many places whose development and staging
environments exactly match anyway. Those
-Original Message-
From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Is the need for multiple CF instances diminishing?
Are other technologies limited to 1GB or ram?
Doesn't Java suffer from this same limitation? It
I've got two ongoing How-to series on my site that may help you.
The first covers many basics of CFCs and OOP with ColdFusion:
http://www.iknowkungfoo.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/8/22/Object-Oriented-Coldfusion--1--Intro-to-Objectcfc
The second covers Mach-II, one of the major ColdFusion
On Feb 6, 2008 12:24 PM, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't agree with that at all.
the use of CFCs doesn't necessarily have anything to do with object
oriented design. Lots of CFCs are just groupings of functions to
perform application tasks. But they're not really object oriented
On Feb 6, 2008 11:54 PM, Adrian Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got two ongoing How-to series on my site that may help you.
The first covers many basics of CFCs and OOP with ColdFusion:
I have a hard time understanding why PLUM was not better received
with in the coldfusion community as a whole. I understand it is not
oop or certainly not pure mvc...I understand it was written by
titans within the coldfusion community that didn't get along with
other titans within the
So I just finished a meeting with our maintenance department. They
showed me this huge POS hosted application that they have been using for
managing their projects/maintenance requests. So I get to build a new
trouble-ticket system for them. Rather than re-invent the wheel I
thought I would
just 'cuz i think this could be an interesting convo... then why use
CFCs at all? if you're just grouping similar functions together, why
not just a cfinclude to a .cfm?
One good reason is you can cache the CFC in the Application scope (as long
as it is a singleton), so it's always in RAM
That's the nice thing. I don't think it's going to go into production. We're
thinking that it might just be internal which means that the staging server
is just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Oh ... also speaking of people having a difficult time wrapping their
heads around something... I've never, not *once* since I implemented
specific support for CFCs in the framework, written an application that
wasn't 100% object-oriented in the model layer. And yet somehow, it
seems merely
The real issue I would have is that, as far as I can tell, the framework
isn't actively maintained. Does anyone know if there is ongoing development
on the Plum framework and tools?
Even if there is, I'd recommend looking at one of the more mainstream
frameworks like Model-Glue, Fusebox, Coldbox,
CFC's can be cached in the application scope, so you don't have to include
the file every time, plus it should run at least slightly faster.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:
32bit Java. 64bit Java doesn't suffer from this limitation AFAIR.
Speaking of which, is CF certified on any 64bit java? I remember
something about it being certified on x64 Solaris or something.
Is anyone using it on a 64bit Java under windows?
Hmmm, this knowledge base article shows
I have a JS menu that is configured using a CFM file. The CFM file is the
one that creates all the menu items based on security permissions.
Question is this: How can I use that same configuration on a .NET
application?
Project Tracker looks pretty good, and is open source.
I'm pretty sure it works on 2005 too:
http://projecttracker.riaforge.org/
Mark
On Feb 7, 2008 8:05 AM, Bruce Sorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I just finished a meeting with our maintenance department. They
showed me this huge POS hosted
Russ wrote:
The 2GB address space limit only exists on 32 bit architectures, correct? A
server running lets say Windows 2003 x64 Server or any flavor of x64 Linux
wouldn't have that limitation, correct? So why are we stuck using the
outdated 32bit JVM?
How long have 64-bit Sun JVMs been
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
