On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, John M Bliss wrote:
This may be a shot in the dark, but, does anyone on this list
have a resource/URL/etc illustrating average traceroute/ping times between
high-end Web hosting facilities and 'Net locations around the world?
Run your own tests:
It sure is a word:
Entry from US dictionary
Like I said. Not a word.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
From Merriam-Webster:
* truthiness
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling
suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.
*
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
It sure is a word:
Entry from US dictionary
How about the honeypot method that was presented
on CFMeetup a few months ago?
Never heard of it. Any reference ?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.google.com/#hl=encp=6gs_id=mxhr=tq=honeypot
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, wrote:
How about the honeypot method that was presented
on CFMeetup a few months ago?
Never heard of it. Any reference ?
~|
I can't find a reference on www.meetup.com/coldfusionmeetup
to the archived presentation, but the basic idea is this:
Add a hidden form field that a user can't see, and therefore,
won't fill in, and use it to trap a bot/spider.
The bot doesn't realize the field is hidden and puts something
in
The bot doesn't realize the field is hidden and puts something
in it. Check the field when the form is submitted for the
presence of a value in the field.
OK, I see. But there is no guaranty the bot will fill the field.
I prefer the reverse : add a field in a onclick event and check for the
Interestingly enough, it was there word of the year in 2006:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/06words.htm
On 13 October 2011 12:42, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
From Merriam-Webster:
* truthiness
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling
suggestion
I have a niche directory website that lists dozens of other related sites.
What would be the best way to determine if a web site is up/down so I can
programmatically make a site active or inactive? I was thinking of just
creating a scheduled task and using cfhttp and looking for a status code
of
the easiest way would be to CFHTTP the site and make sure you get a
valid response back and not an error or a timeout.
that is really the most reliable method and is how most of this uptime
services work.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Che Vilnonis ch...@asitv.com wrote:
I have a niche
Have you look at the System Probes feature in the CF Admin?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Che Vilnonis ch...@asitv.com wrote:
I have a niche directory website that lists dozens of other related sites.
What would be the best way to determine if a web site is up/down so I can
Russ, thanks for the +1
Ray, I have not. The site will be hosted on Railo so I don't believe that's
an option.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 9:51 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Determining if multiple Sites are
This can be fine. However, depending on your needs, you might want to
use an external service for site monitoring. I've used siteuptime.com
for a while and it's proved very useful and easy to use. I've not used
it, but they have an API that may let you perform actions when sites
drop out, etc.
+1 for siteuptime.com.
I can get messages sent to my mobile phone that keep me
informed, even on the go.
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Watson [mailto:watson.domi...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 9:59 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Determining if multiple Sites are
I didn't know about the IP addresses part. I'm going to be
implementing the feature with that. I don't see the IP
address relevance at this point. You've almost certainly have
read more about the approach than I have.
Can you describe using an onclick event a little more?
Such as, when what
+1 for using an external service, I would however suggest you find a
good PAID service. The FREE ones are very unreliable.
Russ
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
+1 for siteuptime.com.
I can get messages sent to my mobile phone that keep me
Call me old school, but I just run Nagios + NagiosQL on one of my VPS's
to monitor my various machines. It's a real pain in the arse to setup,
to be sure, but it gets the job done.
To help with the setup, I have a VM locally that runs Groundworks
locally. After that's configured, I export
...which is an online survey.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Dominic Watson
watson.domi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Interestingly enough, it was there word of the year in 2006:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/06words.htm
On 13 October 2011 12:42, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
I have an automated report that puts an attachment of a data dump from a tally.
I need to have it not insert the attachment if there was no data entered in the
tally. How do you do this?
Thank you
~|
Order the Adobe
cfif len(tally) GT 0
add attachment
/cfif
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, John Watts jahana...@msn.com wrote:
I have an automated report that puts an attachment of a data dump from a
tally. I need to have it not insert the attachment if there was no data
entered in the tally. How do
...which is an online survey.
Words aren't managed through a central authority. They exist by
consensus. If enough people started using blutz to mean something,
it would be a word.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a
I have an automated report that puts an attachment of a data dump from
a tally. I need to have it not insert the attachment if there was no
data entered in the tally. How do you do this?
Thank you
That didn't work right. It put add attachment on the page, which should be
blank. The
I've been doing that one for years (and offered it as potential solution
here a few times). Hiding it by CSS or JS is the key.
Typically, I put the normal text field and some text next to it like dont
fill in this field in a single div then use CSS and/or JS to hide it from
real people.
It has
The onclick sounds pretty cool. I never thought to do it like that.
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com
[mailto:=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans
If it were added to a reputable dictionary you would be absolutely correct.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
...which is an online survey.
Words aren't managed through a central authority. They exist by
consensus. If enough people started using blutz
Can you describe using an onclick event a little more?
Here is a example:
SCRIPT
function validateForm(b)
{
var NewInput = document.createElement(input );
NewInput.setAttribute('name','validateForm');
NewInput.setAttribute('type','hidden');
b.form.appendChild(NewInput);
I think what Russ was trying to indicate was that you need a conditional
statement to evaluate if there is data in the tally. Inside the conditional
you have your cfmailparam tag to attach the file.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:07 PM, John Watts jahana...@msn.com wrote:
I have an automated
If it were added to a reputable dictionary you would be absolutely correct.
And, if it were not, I'd still be correct. This is Linguistics 101
stuff. Dictionaries don't create words, they list the words that are
already in use. Words exists before dictionaries recognize them.
Dave Watts, CTO,
I think what Russ was trying to indicate was that you need a conditional
statement to evaluate if there is data in the tally. Inside the conditional
you have your cfmailparam tag to attach the file.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:07 PM, John Watts jahana...@msn.com wrote:
How do I go about doing
I think what Russ was trying to indicate was that you need a conditional
statement to evaluate if there is data in the tally. Inside the conditional
you have your cfmailparam tag to attach the file.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:07 PM, John Watts jahana...@msn.com wrote:
How do you do that?
Sure they exist. However using a word, such as truthiness doesn't make it
right. People also say flustrated, so since it exists, it's a word, it
doesn't make it right.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
If it were added to a reputable dictionary you would
In terms of language, what is right? I can say anything I want.
Period. Whether you understand the meaning or not is inconsequential.
Dave is right. Long live blutz and can be move the blutz on please?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
Sure they exist.
Ok. Let's assume your dump variable is a string, and it's called tally.
Let's also assume you are attaching your files to your mail using the
cfmailparam tag.
cfmail to= from= etc
This is your email body content
cfif len(tally)
cfmailparam file=pathToYourFile
/cfif
/cfmail
On Thu, Oct
Sure they exist. However using a word, such as truthiness doesn't make it
right. People also say flustrated, so since it exists, it's a word, it
doesn't make it right.
There's no consensus among English speakers about flustrated, so,
no, it is not yet a word. But if this changes over time,
And I always thought that flustrated was a combination of Flustered and
Frustrated.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:48 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Shouldn't these statements work?
Sure they exist. However using a
What's right in language is subjective of course, but if you use words that
are made up or illustrate a lack of understanding of the language you are
trying to speak, such as flustrated, it hinders your ability to
effectively communicate as well as your ability to be taken seriously.
You can use
What's right in language is subjective of course, but if you use words that
are made up or illustrate a lack of understanding of the language you are
trying to speak, such as flustrated, it hinders your ability to
effectively communicate as well as your ability to be taken seriously.
ALL
True Dave. However the fact that at some far off point in the future
incorrect usage of words may become correct shouldn't be justification for
using them incorrectly now, should it?
Words have specific meanings. That might change in the future, sure. However
when you're trying to communicate in
True Dave. However the fact that at some far off point in the future
incorrect usage of words may become correct shouldn't be justification for
using them incorrectly now, should it?
If I recall correctly, this tangent to the thread came up with your
objection to the word truthiness, which
and the utterly ridiculous txt speak is enough proof of that :-)
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
True Dave. However the fact that at some far off point in the future
incorrect usage of words may become correct shouldn't be justification for
using them
I think you're being obtuse Dave. And that's your right to do so. You're
right from an idealistic perspective. I'll give you that. My position comes
from the practical world, not the theoretical one. You meet with a CEO and
use truthiness in a presentation you'll look like a fool. You use a world
I'd say Oxford is a more reputable dictionary than Webster.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
If it were added to a reputable dictionary you would be absolutely correct.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
...which
Sorry... I may be mistaken.. This STILL is a ColdFusion list.. Correct?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Brian Kotek brian...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd say Oxford is a more reputable dictionary than Webster.
~|
Order the Adobe
Also: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/truthiness
Entry from World dictionary
Sorry, didn't mean to start a flame war. Just pointing out that it's
definitely a recognized word.
(Ducks)
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
It sure is a word:
I think you're being obtuse Dave. And that's your right to do so. You're
right from an idealistic perspective. I'll give you that. My position comes
from the practical world, not the theoretical one. You meet with a CEO and
use truthiness in a presentation you'll look like a fool.
Really?
Say goodbye to your thread Rick. :-/
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
I can only imagine what a game of scrabble must be like at your house.
In the interest of moving forward and freeing up my spare time I'll concede to
you that truthiness is a word. (Even though the red squiggle under the word
right now seems to be mocking me.)
We'll have to agree to disagree
However, I do not have -Xms1g -Xmx1g in the JVM args.
Do I need both?
I'll defer to others since I never used to change settings via the admin...
The CF admin provides separate fields for the min and max memory and
will automatically include those values in the JVM arguments so there
is no
Now I owe Dave $1. He bet me that he could get you to admit truthiness was
a word... crap!
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:59 PM
Indeed. In the same way I admit to my daughter that she's right when she
tells me it's Pig Newtons, not Fig Newtons.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Bobby Hartsfield bo...@acoderslife.comwrote:
Now I owe Dave $1. He bet me that he could get you to admit truthiness
was
a word... crap!
All that for a dollar? Sounds like a very expensive dollar.
G! - runs for cover
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Bobby Hartsfield bo...@acoderslife.comwrote:
Now I owe Dave $1. He bet me that he could get you to admit truthiness
was
a word... crap!
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby
I have a page that does a moderately involved query: it returns 16 fields with
3 left joins, a simple WHERE and ORDER. (I'd include it here but I'm remoting
in and can't copy-and-paste). The database is small - only 40 or so record at
this point.
I can see it in Mozilla and IE, with XP and
I can only imagine what a game of scrabble must be like at your house.
It must be nonexistent, as I don't play Scrabble. That said, my
understanding of the rules is that you use a specific dictionary as an
authoritative answer to whether you can play a word. That's fine, it's
just a game, and
Larry,
ColdFusion will not return something different to different browsers unless
you explicitly tell it to do so. The most likely culprit here is bad HTML,
Javascript and CSS. It sounds like an unclosed (or unopened) table tag, a
missing quote on an inline style attribute, or something
54 matches
Mail list logo
